World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3754 3462 2100 1891 124 10066

Carl L. Hart publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carl L. Hart between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carl L. Hart published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2010. 2 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2010. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carl L. Hart: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 6
2004 2
2005 11
2006 4
2007 7
2008 10
2009 4
2010 13
2011 1
2012 7
2013 2
2014 8
2015 8
2016 7
2017 8
2018 5
2019 4
2020 7
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 133
Download as CSV

Carl L. Hart publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl L. Hart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 124
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Carl L. Hart D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl L. Hart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Carl L. Hart is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and primarily conducts research in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Epidemiology; Pharmacology; and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their main research topics focus extensively on prenatal substance exposure effects, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, opioid use disorder treatment, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, cannabis and cannabinoid research, forensic toxicology and drug analysis, as well as neonatal and fetal brain pathology.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs," 2021, The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Totality of the Evidence Suggests Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Does Not Lead to Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic and Critical Review," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Exaggerating Harmful Drug Effects on the Brain Is Killing Black People," 2020, Neuron
  • "Methamphetamine, amphetamine, and aggression in humans: A systematic review of drug administration studies," 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Pathways to Drug Liberalization: Racial Justice, Public Health, and Human Rights," 2021, The American Journal of Bioethics

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as Frontiers in Psychology, The American Journal of Bioethics, Neuron, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, and JMIR Research Protocols.

The list of frequent co-authors includes Christopher Medina-Kirchner, Kate Y. O'Malley, Ciara A. Torres, Brian D. Earp, and Jonathan Lewis.

Carl L. Hart received the Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) award in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal–striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving

    Hedy Kober;Peter Mende-Siedlecki;Ethan F. Kross;Jochen Weber

  • Public health and international drug policy

    Joanne Csete;Adeeba Kamarulzaman;Michel Kazatchkine;Frederick Altice

  • Marijuana withdrawal in humans: effects of oral THC or divalproex.

    Margaret Haney;Carl L Hart;Suzanne K Vosburg;Jennifer Nasser

  • Effects of Acute Smoked Marijuana on Complex Cognitive Performance

    Carl L Hart;Wilfred van Gorp;Margaret Haney;Richard W Foltin

  • Is Cognitive Functioning Impaired in Methamphetamine Users? A Critical Review

    Carl L Hart;Caroline B Marvin;Rae Silver;Edward E Smith

  • “Spice” and “K2” Herbal Highs: A Case Series and Systematic Review of the Clinical Effects and Biopsychosocial Implications of Synthetic Cannabinoid Use in Humans

    Erik W Gunderson;Heather M Haughey;Nassima Ait-Daoud;Amruta S Joshi

  • Dronabinol and marijuana in HIV-positive marijuana smokers. Caloric intake, mood, and sleep.

    Margaret Haney;Erik W Gunderson;Judith Rabkin;Carl L Hart

  • Smoked Cocaine Self-Administration is Decreased by Modafinil

    Carl L Hart;Margaret Haney;Suzanne K Vosburg;Eric Rubin

  • Effects of THC and lofexidine in a human laboratory model of marijuana withdrawal and relapse

    Margaret Haney;Carl L. Hart;Suzanne K. Vosburg;Sandra D. Comer

  • Regulation of craving by cognitive strategies in cigarette smokers.

    Hedy Kober;Ethan F. Kross;Walter Mischel;Carl L. Hart

  • Amphetamine-group substances and HIV

    Grant Colfax;Glenn-Milo Santos;Priscilla Chu;Eric Vittinghoff

  • Comparison of smoked marijuana and oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans

    Carl L. Hart;Amie S. Ward;Margaret Haney;Sandra D. Comer

  • A survey of synthetic cannabinoid consumption by current cannabis users.

    Erik W. Gunderson;Heather M. Haughey;Nassima Ait-Daoud;Amruta S. Joshi

  • Cannabis and Psychosis: a Critical Overview of the Relationship

    Charles Ksir;Carl L. Hart

  • Bupropion SR worsens mood during marijuana withdrawal in humans.

    Margaret Haney;Amie S. Ward;Sandra D. Comer;Carl L. Hart

  • Alternative reinforcers differentially modify cocaine self-administration by humans.

    C L Hart;M Haney;R W Foltin;M W Fischman

  • A Single Ketamine Infusion Combined With Motivational Enhancement Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Midazolam-Controlled Pilot Trial

    Elias Dakwar;Frances Levin;Carl L Hart;Cale Basaraba

  • The effects of subanesthetic ketamine infusions on motivation to quit and cue-induced craving in cocaine-dependent research volunteers.

    Elias Dakwar;Frances Levin;Richard W. Foltin;Edward V. Nunes

  • Methamphetamine self-administration by humans.

    Carl L. Hart;Amie S. Ward;Margaret Haney;Richard W. Foltin

  • A Single Ketamine Infusion Combined With Mindfulness-Based Behavioral Modification to Treat Cocaine Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Elias Dakwar;Edward V. Nunes;Carl L. Hart;Richard W. Foltin

  • Acute Physiological and Behavioral Effects of Intranasal Methamphetamine in Humans

    Carl L Hart;Erik W Gunderson;Audrey Perez;Matthew G Kirkpatrick

  • Frequent marijuana use, binge drinking and mental health problems among undergraduates

    Diana R. Keith;Carl L. Hart;Michael P. McNeil;Rae Silver;Rae Silver

  • A direct comparison of the behavioral and physiological effects of methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans

    Matthew G. Kirkpatrick;Matthew G. Kirkpatrick;Erik W. Gunderson;Audrey Y. Perez;Margaret Haney

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard W. Foltin
Richard W. Foltin Columbia University
Margaret Haney
Margaret Haney Columbia University
Sandra D. Comer
Sandra D. Comer Columbia University
Frances R. Levin
Frances R. Levin Columbia University
Renee D. Goodwin
Renee D. Goodwin City University of New York
Edward V. Nunes
Edward V. Nunes Columbia University
Rae Silver
Rae Silver Columbia University
Eric J. Rubin
Eric J. Rubin Harvard University
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Sanjay J. Mathew
Sanjay J. Mathew Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open up diverse career opportunities in counseling, research, education, and human resources. Students can find flexible study options through remote learning, perfect for those balancing work or family obligations.

When researching programs, consider factors such as accreditation, curriculum quality, and specialization tracks. Many top colleges across the country offer online options, equipping students with foundational knowledge and practical experience.

For example, students residing in Arkansas can check the best psychology degree programs ranking in Conway for highly rated options in that area. Likewise, those in Virginia should review the top psychology programs in Fairfax, while learners in Florida can explore the top psychology programs in Florida.

Similarly, prospective students in Georgia will benefit from visiting the best psychology program rankings in Georgia. Comparing programs across states and formats will help prospective students find an online degree that fits their needs and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Carl L. Hart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles