World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc N. Potenza

Marc N. Potenza

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 140 196 176 127 111 929 77453

Marc N. Potenza publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc N. Potenza between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc N. Potenza published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 30.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 100 publications in 2021. 185 of the 1,170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 100. Peak 100 publications in 2021. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 66 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 56 publications 2018: 54 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 91 publications 2021: 100 publications 2022: 89 publications 2023: 90 publications 2024: 93 publications 2025: 92 publications
1988 2025

1,170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc N. Potenza: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 4
2000 2
2001 5
2002 4
2003 12
2004 11
2005 11
2006 14
2007 15
2008 22
2009 25
2010 36
2011 33
2012 33
2013 45
2014 66
2015 44
2016 52
2017 56
2018 54
2019 52
2020 91
2021 100
2022 89
2023 90
2024 93
2025 92
Total 1,170
Download as CSV

Marc N. Potenza publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc N. Potenza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 887+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 929 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100 929
Download as CSV

Marc N. Potenza D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc N. Potenza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10 140
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc N. Potenza is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and related subfields, including cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their academic output spans a broad range of topics that explore the impact of technology, mental health, and behavioral patterns.

Potenza's work extensively covers the following main research topics:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Their recent scholarly publications include studies on internet use and behavioral addictions, addressing contemporary issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic's effect on problematic internet behaviors. Notable papers include:

  • "Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance," 2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • "Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Relationships between Severity of Internet Gaming Disorder, Severity of Problematic Social Media Use, Sleep Quality and Psychological Distress," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Do men become addicted to internet gaming and women to social media? A meta-analysis examining gender-related differences in specific internet addiction," 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of 'other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors'?" 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Potenza frequently publishes in specialized journals that focus on addiction and psychiatric research. The primary venues where they have contributed multiple works include:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Current Addiction Reports
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors who have appeared frequently across their publications. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Zsolt Demetrovics
  • Chung-Ying Lin
  • Shane W. Kraus
  • Gemma Mestre-Bach
  • Beáta Bőthe

Best Publications

  • Developmental Neurocircuitry of Motivation in Adolescence: A Critical Period of Addiction Vulnerability

    R. Andrew Chambers;Jane R. Taylor;Marc N. Potenza

  • Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model.

    Matthias Brand;Matthias Brand;Kimberly S. Young;Christian Laier;Klaus Wölfling

  • Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of 3090 Patients

    Daniel Weintraub;Juergen Koester;Marc N. Potenza;Andrew D. Siderowf

  • Introduction to Behavioral Addictions

    Jon E. Grant;Marc N. Potenza;Aviv Weinstein;David A. Gorelick

  • The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors.

    Matthias Brand;Matthias Brand;Elisa Wegmann;Rudolf Stark;Astrid Müller

  • Should addictive disorders include non‐substance‐related conditions?

    Marc N. Potenza

  • Association of dopamine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease.

    Daniel Weintraub;Andrew D. Siderowf;Marc N. Potenza;Joseph Goveas

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.

    Orsolya Király;Marc N. Potenza;Dan J. Stein;Daniel L. King

  • Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review.

    Naomi A Fineberg;Naomi A Fineberg;Naomi A Fineberg;Marc N Potenza;Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Heather A Berlin

  • The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: an overview and new findings

    Marc N Potenza

  • Stress and eating behaviors.

    Yvonne H. C. Yau;Marc N. Potenza

  • The neurobiology and genetics of impulse control disorders: relationships to drug addictions.

    Judson A. Brewer;Marc N. Potenza

  • Gender-Related Differences in the Characteristics of Problem Gamblers Using a Gambling Helpline

    Marc N. Potenza;Marvin A. Steinberg;Susan D. McLaughlin;Ran Wu

  • Validation of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease

    Daniel Weintraub;Staci Hoops;Judy A. Shea;Judy A. Shea;Kelly E. Lyons

  • Gambling urges in pathological gambling: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Marc N. Potenza;Marvin A. Steinberg;Pawel Skudlarski;Robert K. Fulbright

  • A cognitive-behavioral model of Internet gaming disorder: Theoretical underpinnings and clinical implications

    Guangheng Dong;Marc N. Potenza

  • Video-Gaming Among High School Students: Health Correlates, Gender Differences, and Problematic Gaming

    Rani A. Desai;Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin;Dana Cavallo;Marc N. Potenza

  • Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: a focus on impulsivity and compulsivity

    Robert F. Leeman;Marc N. Potenza

  • New Developments in Human Neurocognition: Clinical, Genetic, and Brain Imaging Correlates of Impulsivity and Compulsivity

    Naomi A Fineberg;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Anna E. Goudriaan;Dan J. Stein

  • Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling.

    R. Andrew Chambers;Marc N. Potenza

  • The neurobiology of substance and behavioral addictions.

    Jon E. Grant;Judson A. Brewer;Marc N. Potenza

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda C. Mayes
Linda C. Mayes Yale University
Jon E. Grant
Jon E. Grant University of Chicago
Iris M. Balodis
Iris M. Balodis McMaster University
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University
Shane W. Kraus
Shane W. Kraus University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University
Hedy Kober
Hedy Kober Yale University
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Neuroscience, a range of online degrees and career options are available to help you expand your expertise and professional horizons. Many choose related fields such as psychology, social work, or counseling to complement their neuroscience background.

If you’re seeking a direct, research-focused route, a psychology degree online can provide a flexible learning environment and core skills essential for behavioral science careers. Those interested in serving communities and making a difference may explore accelerated msw programs, which emphasize social work with a faster path to graduation.

For counseling careers, finding accredited and affordable options is crucial. Pursuing cacrep accredited online counseling programs ensures your academic credentials meet the highest industry standards. If cost is a significant factor, investigating the cheapest online lpc programs can help you achieve your career goals without undue financial strain.

These related online degrees equip neuroscience students with broader skills and new pathways, supporting various rewarding roles in science, healthcare, and community service.

Best Scientists Citing Marc N. Potenza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles