World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Iris M. Balodis

Iris M. Balodis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10869 10173 749 704 74 4716

Iris M. Balodis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iris M. Balodis between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iris M. Balodis published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2021. 12 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
2006 2025

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iris M. Balodis: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 4
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 3
2015 6
2016 6
2017 6
2018 5
2019 11
2020 6
2021 13
2022 5
2023 7
2024 6
2025 6
Total 98
Download as CSV

Iris M. Balodis publications per year - data summary

  • Iris M. Balodis, a Psychology scholar from McMaster University, has 98 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2006, 2007 and 2009, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 20 years in the span carries no publications at all (2008).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.2 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 37 publications, 38% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 12 publications (1.7 per year); 2013-2019: 43 publications (6.1 per year); 2020-2025: 43 publications (7.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Iris M. Balodis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris M. Balodis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 74
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Iris M. Balodis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Iris M. Balodis, a Psychology scholar from McMaster University, records 74 publications - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Iris M. Balodis, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Iris M. Balodis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Iris M. Balodis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris M. Balodis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Iris M. Balodis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Iris M. Balodis, a Psychology scholar from McMaster University, records 32 D-Index - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Iris M. Balodis, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Iris M. Balodis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Iris M. Balodis is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with a specific emphasis on clinical psychology, pharmacology, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including cannabis and cannabinoid research, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, gambling behavior and treatments, eating disorders and behaviors, behavioral health and interventions, homelessness and social issues, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Their recent papers include:

  • Overlapping patterns of recreational and medical cannabis use in a large community sample of cannabis users, 2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Food addiction in a large community sample of Canadian adults: prevalence and relationship with obesity, body composition, quality of life and impulsivity, 2021, Addiction
  • Multidimensional elements of impulsivity as shared and unique risk factors for food addiction and alcohol misuse, 2020, Appetite
  • Cannabis use and misuse in the year following recreational cannabis legalization in Canada: A longitudinal observational cohort study of community adults in Ontario, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Balodis include:

  • James MacKillop
  • Sarah L. Brassard
  • Kiran Punia
  • Meenu Minhas
  • James G. Murphy

The most frequent publication venues for Balodis's work are:

  • Academic Emergency Medicine
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Addiction
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Best Publications

  • Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta‐analysis of continuous associations

    Michael Amlung;Lana Vedelago;John Acker;Iris Balodis

  • Anticipatory Reward Processing in Addicted Populations: A Focus on the Monetary Incentive Delay Task

    Iris M. Balodis;Marc N. Potenza

  • Diminished frontostriatal activity during processing of monetary rewards and losses in pathological gambling.

    Iris M. Balodis;Hedy Kober;Patrick D. Worhunsky;Michael C. Stevens

  • Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications

    Kristen R. Hamilton;Marci R. Mitchell;Victoria C. Wing;Iris M. Balodis

  • Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis.

    M. Amlung;T. Petker;J. Jackson;I. Balodis

  • The neurobiology of impulsivity and substance use disorders: implications for treatment.

    Karolina Kozak;Karolina Kozak;Aliya M. Lucatch;Darby J.E. Lowe;Iris M. Balodis

  • Monetary reward processing in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder.

    Iris M. Balodis;Hedy Kober;Patrick D. Worhunsky;Marney A. White

  • Divergent neural substrates of inhibitory control in binge eating disorder relative to other manifestations of obesity

    Iris M. Balodis;Nathan D. Molina;Hedy Kober;Patrick D. Worhunsky

  • Overlapping patterns of recreational and medical cannabis use in a large community sample of cannabis users

    Jasmine Turna;Iris Balodis;Catharine Munn;Michael Van Ameringen

  • Binge drinking in undergraduates: relationships with sex, drinking behaviors, impulsivity, and the perceived effects of alcohol.

    Iris M. Balodis;Marc N. Potenza;Mary C. Olmstead

  • The other side of the curve: Examining the relationship between pre-stressor physiological responses and stress reactivity

    Iris M. Balodis;Katherine E. Wynne-Edwards;Mary C. Olmstead

  • A pilot study linking reduced fronto–Striatal recruitment during reward processing to persistent bingeing following treatment for binge‐eating disorder

    Iris M. Balodis;Carlos M. Grilo;Hedy Kober;Patrick D. Worhunsky

  • Neurobiological features of binge eating disorder.

    Iris M. Balodis;Carlos M. Grilo;Marc N. Potenza

  • Neurobiological considerations in understanding behavioral treatments for pathological gambling.

    Marc N. Potenza;Iris M. Balodis;Christine A. Franco;Scott Bullock

  • Instructional cues modify performance on the Iowa Gambling Task

    Iris M. Balodis;Tara K. MacDonald;Mary C. Olmstead

  • A preliminary investigation of Stroop-related intrinsic connectivity in cocaine dependence: associations with treatment outcomes.

    Marci R. Mitchell;Iris M. Balodis;Elise E. DeVito;Cheryl M. Lacadie

  • A Preliminary Study of DBH (Encoding Dopamine Beta-Hydroxylase) Genetic Variation and Neural Correlates of Emotional and Motivational Processing in Individuals With and Without Pathological Gambling.

    Bao-Zhu Yang;Iris M. Balodis;Cheryl M. Lacadie;Jiansong Xu

  • Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Sarah Weinsztok;Sarah Brassard;Iris Balodis;Laura E. Martin

  • Relating neural processing of reward and loss prospect to risky decision-making in individuals with and without Gambling Disorder.

    Iris M. Balodis;Jakob Linnet;Fiza Arshad;Patrick D. Worhunsky

  • Neural Correlates of Personalized Spiritual Experiences

    Lisa Miller;Iris M Balodis;Iris M Balodis;Clayton H McClintock;Jiansong Xu

  • Reward-related frontostriatal activity and smoking behavior among adolescents in treatment for smoking cessation.

    Kathleen A. Garrison;Sarah W. Yip;Iris M. Balodis;Kathleen M. Carroll

  • Binge-eating disorder: Clinical and therapeutic advances.

    Peter H. Hutson;Iris M. Balodis;Marc N. Potenza

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University
Michael Amlung
Michael Amlung University of Kansas
Hedy Kober
Hedy Kober Yale University
Mary C. Olmstead
Mary C. Olmstead Queen's University
Michael C. Stevens
Michael C. Stevens Yale University
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to various online degree options and specialized career paths. Many students prefer accelerated psychology online degree programs to fast-track their education and enter the workforce quickly. These programs often offer flexibility and condensed coursework, making them ideal for working professionals or those with busy schedules.

For those interested in advanced practice and clinical roles, pursuing online clinical psychology programs apa accredited provides a strong foundation for licensure. These programs meet high standards set by the American Psychological Association, ensuring quality and credibility.

Another increasingly popular pathway is through apa-accredited hybrid psyd programs, which combine online study with essential in-person clinical experiences. These programs are ideal for those aiming to become practicing psychologists.

In the field of applied behavior analysis, obtaining bcba certification online prepares graduates for specialized roles supporting children and adults with behavioral challenges. This certification can open doors to impactful careers in education, health, and community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Iris M. Balodis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles