World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mary C. Olmstead

Mary C. Olmstead

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
7138
World Ranking
8502
National Ranking
497

Mary C. Olmstead publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Olmstead sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mary C. Olmstead D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Olmstead sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary C. Olmstead is a researcher affiliated with Queen's University in Canada. Their work spans several fields of study, primarily focusing on neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with a significant emphasis on clinical psychology and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Additional subfields of research include pharmacology, neurology, and the endocrine and autonomic systems.

Their research topics cover a range of areas within neuroscience and behavioral science. Key topics include:

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Mary C. Olmstead's notable recent publications include:

  • Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: Evidence of mood & cognitive impairment, 2021, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health
  • The endocannabinoid system is modulated in reward and homeostatic brain regions following diet-induced obesity in rats: a cluster analysis approach, 2021, European Journal of Nutrition
  • Does inflammation link stress to poor COVID-19 outcome?, 2020, Stress and Health
  • Delta opioid receptor activation modulates affective pain and modality-specific pain hypersensitivity associated with chronic neuropathic pain, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Can cocaine-induced neuroinflammation explain maladaptive cocaine-associated memories?, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Katia Befort
  • Steven J. Lamontagne
  • Romain Bourdy
  • Dominique Filliol
  • Virginie Andry

Mary C. Olmstead publishes regularly in several scientific journals, with multiple papers appearing in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health
  • European Journal of Nutrition
  • Stress and Health
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research

Best Publications

  • Associative processes in addiction and reward. The role of amygdala-ventral striatal subsystems

    Barry J. Everitt;John A. Parkinson;Mary C. Olmstead;Mercedes Arroyo

  • Dissociation in effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core and shell on appetitive pavlovian approach behavior and the potentiation of conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity by D-amphetamine.

    John A. Parkinson;Mary C. Olmstead;Lindsay H. Burns;Trevor W. Robbins

  • The development of a conditioned place preference to morphine: effects of microinjections into various CNS sites.

    Mary C. Olmstead;Keith B. J. Franklin

  • Ultra-low-dose naloxone suppresses opioid tolerance, dependence and associated changes in mu opioid receptor–G protein coupling and Gβγ signaling

    H.-Y. Wang;E. Friedman;M.C. Olmstead;L.H. Burns

  • Adolescent enrichment partially reverses the social isolation syndrome.

    Kim G.C Hellemans;Luis C Benge;Mary C Olmstead

  • Paradoxical effects of the opioid antagonist naltrexone on morphine analgesia, tolerance, and reward in rats.

    Kelly J. Powell;Noura S. Abul-Husn;Asha Jhamandas;Mary C. Olmstead

  • Microglia Disrupt Mesolimbic Reward Circuitry in Chronic Pain

    Anna M. W. Taylor;Annie Castonguay;Alison J. Taylor;Niall P. Murphy

  • Effects of Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus Lesions on Responding for Intravenous Heroin under Different Schedules of Reinforcement

    Mary C. Olmstead;Elizabeth M. Munn;Keith B. J. Franklin;Roy A. Wise

  • Cocaine seeking by rats is a goal-directed action.

    Mary C. Olmstead;Matthew V. Lafond;Barry J. Everitt;Anthony Dickinson

  • Alcohol intoxication reduces impulsivity in the delay-discounting paradigm.

    Catherine N. M. Ortner;Tara K. MacDonald;Mary C. Olmstead

  • Selective deficits in attentional performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions.

    Wendy L Inglis;Mary C Olmstead;Trevor W Robbins

  • The development of a conditioned place preference to morphine : Effects of lesions of various CNS sites

    Mary C. Olmstead;Keith B. J. Franklin

  • Repeated exposure to stress across the childhood-adolescent period alters rats' anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in adulthood: The importance of stressor type and gender.

    Joanna Pohl;Mary C. Olmstead;Katherine E. Wynne-Edwards;Kate Harkness

  • Effects of chronic cocaine on impulsivity: relation to cortical serotonin mechanisms.

    Tracie A. Paine;Hans C. Dringenberg;Mary C. Olmstead

  • Animal models of drug addiction: Where do we go from here?

    Mary C. Olmstead

  • Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus block drug-induced reinforcement but not amphetamine-induced locomotion

    Mary C. Olmstead;Keith B.J. Franklin

  • Integrated contributions of basal forebrain and thalamus to neocortical activation elicited by pedunculopontine tegmental stimulation in urethane-anesthetized rats

    H.C Dringenberg;M.C Olmstead

  • Binge drinking in undergraduates: relationships with sex, drinking behaviors, impulsivity, and the perceived effects of alcohol.

    Iris M. Balodis;Marc N. Potenza;Mary C. Olmstead

  • The other side of the curve: Examining the relationship between pre-stressor physiological responses and stress reactivity

    Iris M. Balodis;Katherine E. Wynne-Edwards;Mary C. Olmstead

  • Mu and Delta Opioid Receptors Oppositely Regulate Motor Impulsivity in the Signaled Nose Poke Task

    Mary C. Olmstead;Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal;Brigitte L. Kieffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine M. Cahill
Catherine M. Cahill University of California, Los Angeles
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
Iris M. Balodis
Iris M. Balodis McMaster University
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Keith B.J. Franklin
Keith B.J. Franklin McGill University
Richard J. Beninger
Richard J. Beninger Queen's University
Christopher J. Evans
Christopher J. Evans University of California, Los Angeles
James N. Reynolds
James N. Reynolds Queen's University
John A. Parkinson
John A. Parkinson Bangor University
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA also opens doors to a range of online degrees and possible career pathways in related fields. For students interested in providing direct support, cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) offer a pathway into counseling, focusing on student mental health and well-being. These programs are both accessible and recognized for their quality, making them attractive options.

For those interested in clinical practice or therapy in broader contexts, affordable online masters counseling programs provide specialized training in various counseling modalities. Students can also pursue licenses to become professional counselors.

If your interest lies in supporting families and couples, online mft programs accredited focus on marriage and family therapy, blending neuroscience concepts with practical therapeutic skills.

For a broader psychological perspective, online psychology masters prepare graduates for numerous roles in research, education, and healthcare. Each of these options can complement a neuroscience background, expanding career opportunities in mental health, counseling, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Olmstead

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles