World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5240
World Ranking
8929
National Ranking
902

Lee Hogarth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Hogarth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lee Hogarth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Hogarth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lee Hogarth is a researcher affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom, with a primary focus in psychology and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including clinical psychology, epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and general health professions.

Their research topics cover several areas related to behavioral and mental health challenges. These include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, child abuse and trauma, smoking behavior and cessation, homelessness and social issues, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Among their notable recent publications are:

  • Addiction is driven by excessive goal-directed drug choice under negative affect: translational critique of habit and compulsion theory (2020), Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction (2020), Behavioural Brain Research
  • Young adult concurrent use and simultaneous use of alcohol and marijuana: A cross-national examination among college students in seven countries (2021), Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Risk Pathways Contributing to the Alcohol Harm Paradox: Socioeconomic Deprivation Confers Susceptibility to Alcohol Dependence via Greater Exposure to Aversive Experience, Internalizing Symptoms and Drinking to Cope (2022), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Adverse childhood experiences and adulthood mental health: a cross-cultural examination among university students in seven countries (2022), Current Psychology

Hogarth has collaborated frequently with several co-authors known for their research in similar fields. Their frequent collaborators include Adrián J. Bravo, Angelina Pilatti, Laura Mezquita, Ruichong Shuai, and W. Huw Williams.

Their studies have been published repeatedly in specific venues recognized for topics in addiction and behavioral health such as Addictive Behaviors Reports, Current Psychology, Addictive Behaviors, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, and Substance Use & Misuse.

This pattern of publications and collaborations positions Hogarth's work at the intersection of psychological theory, addiction behavior, and public health, addressing factors influencing substance use and mental health outcomes across diverse populations and cultures.

Best Publications

  • The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

    Henry W. Chase;Simon B. Eickhoff;Simon B. Eickhoff;Angela R. Laird;Lee Hogarth

  • Cigarette smoking and depression comorbidity: systematic review and proposed theoretical model

    Amanda R. Mathew;Lee Hogarth;Adam M. Leventhal;Jessica W. Cook

  • Addiction is driven by excessive goal-directed drug choice under negative affect: translational critique of habit and compulsion theory.

    Lee Hogarth

  • The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction

    Matt Field;Jessica Werthmann;Ingmar Franken;Wilhelm Hofmann

  • Associative learning mechanisms underpinning the transition from recreational drug use to addiction.

    Lee Hogarth;Bernard W. Balleine;Laura H. Corbit;Simon Killcross

  • Parallel goal-directed and habitual control of human drug-seeking: implications for dependence vulnerability.

    Lee Hogarth;Henry W. Chase

  • Attentional orienting towards smoking-related stimuli.

    L.C. Hogarth;K. Mogg;B.P. Bradley;T. Duka

  • The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking.

    Lee Hogarth;Anthony Dickinson;Alexander Wright;Mariangela Kouvaraki

  • Goal-directed and transfer-cue-elicited drug-seeking are dissociated by pharmacotherapy: evidence for independent additive controllers.

    Lee Hogarth

  • Repeated ethanol exposure and withdrawal impairs human fear conditioning and depresses long-term potentiation in rat amygdala and hippocampus.

    David N. Stephens;Tamzin L. Ripley;Gilyana Borlikova;Manja Schubert

  • Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?

    Lee Hogarth;Theodora Duka

  • Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: the role of uncertainty.

    Lee Hogarth;Anthony Dickinson;Alison Austin;Craig Brown

  • Impaired goal-directed behavioural control in human impulsivity:

    Lee Hogarth;Henry W. Chase;Kathleen Baess

  • The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans

    Lee Hogarth;Anthony Dickinson;Theodora Duka

  • Isolating behavioural economic indices of demand in relation to nicotine dependence

    Henry W. Chase;James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Lee Hogarth

  • Electrophysiological responses to alcohol cues are not associated with Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in social drinkers.

    Jasna Martinovic;Andrew Jones;Paul Christiansen;Abigail K. Rose

  • Extinction of cue-evoked drug-seeking relies on degrading hierarchical instrumental expectancies

    Lee Hogarth;Lee Hogarth;Chris Retzler;Marcus R Munafò;Dominic M D Tran

  • Evaluating psychological markers for human nicotine dependence: tobacco choice, extinction, and Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.

    Lee Hogarth;Henry W. Chase

  • Intact goal-directed control in treatment-seeking drug users indexed by outcome-devaluation and Pavlovian to instrumental transfer: critique of habit theory.

    Lee Hogarth;Lee Hogarth;Christa Lam-Cassettari;Helena Pacitti;Tara Currah

  • Alcohol expectancy moderates attentional bias for alcohol cues in light drinkers.

    Matt Field;Lee Hogarth;Daniel Bleasdale;Phoebe Wright

  • The role of impulsivity in the aetiology of drug dependence: reward sensitivity versus automaticity

    Lee Hogarth

  • Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction.

    Lee Hogarth;Matt Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Theodora Duka
Theodora Duka University of Sussex
Anthony Dickinson
Anthony Dickinson University of Cambridge
Matt Field
Matt Field University of Sheffield
Ahmed A. Moustafa
Ahmed A. Moustafa Bond University
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Catherine E. Myers
Catherine E. Myers United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Brian Hitsman
Brian Hitsman Northwestern University
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Paul Christiansen
Paul Christiansen University of Liverpool
Leigh V. Panlilio
Leigh V. Panlilio National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA unlocks a variety of career pathways, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Earning an online degree is a flexible option that can help you meet educational requirements for licensure in many states. However, aspiring counselors must be aware that licensure requirements vary considerably from state to state.

For example, those interested in becoming Licensed Professional Counselors should carefully review the Arizona lpc licensure requirements and compare them to the Arkansas lpc licensure requirements. Requirements may include specific coursework, supervised clinical experience, and passing relevant exams.

If you are planning to practice in larger states like California, it is critical to understand the lpc licensure requirements in California, as they may differ significantly from the lpc licensure requirements in Colorado. Researching these state guidelines will help you choose the right online psychology or counseling program and streamline your path toward a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Hogarth

Trending Scientists