World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4960 4599 527 498 145 11891
Neuroscience 52 5258 4828 432 393 146 11984

Quentin J. M. Huys publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Quentin J. M. Huys between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Quentin J. M. Huys published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2025. 57 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2025. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 35 publications
2004 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Quentin J. M. Huys: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 6
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 6
2012 2
2013 10
2014 14
2015 13
2016 17
2017 11
2018 17
2019 10
2020 13
2021 14
2022 14
2023 25
2024 22
2025 35
Total 239
Download as CSV

Quentin J. M. Huys publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin J. M. Huys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 145
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Quentin J. M. Huys D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quentin J. M. Huys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Quentin J. M. Huys is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience with a strong focus on subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including Mental Health Research Topics, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Treatment of Major Depression, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, and Memory and Neural Mechanisms.

Quentin J. M. Huys has contributed to numerous publications, frequently appearing in respected venues such as Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, JAMA Psychiatry, and Scientific Reports.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Advances in the computational understanding of mental illness, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Computational Mechanisms of Effort and Reward Decisions in Patients With Depression and Their Association With Relapse After Antidepressant Discontinuation, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Realizing the Clinical Potential of Computational Psychiatry: Report From the Banbury Center Meeting, February 2019, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • How representative are neuroimaging samples? Large-scale evidence for trait anxiety differences between fMRI and behaviour-only research participants, 2021, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Stimulation of the vagus nerve reduces learning in a go/no-go reinforcement learning task, 2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology

The scientist collaborates regularly with several frequent co-authors, including Isabel M. Berwian, Michael Browning, Henrik Walter, Klaas Ε. Stephan, and Erich Seifritz.

Best Publications

  • Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications

    Quentin J M Huys;Tiago V Maia;Michael J Frank

  • Bonsai Trees in Your Head: How the Pavlovian System Sculpts Goal-Directed Choices by Pruning Decision Trees

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Neir Eshel;Elizabeth J. P. O'Nions;Luke Sheridan

  • Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin J.M. Huys;Quentin J.M. Huys;Lluis Fuentemilla;Peter Dayan

  • Disentangling the Roles of Approach, Activation and Valence in Instrumental and Pavlovian Responding

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Roshan Cools;Martin Gölzer;Eva Friedel

  • Mapping anhedonia onto reinforcement learning: a behavioural meta-analysis

    Quentin Jm Huys;Diego A Pizzagalli;Ryan Bogdan;Peter Dayan

  • Serotonin in Affective Control

    Peter Dayan;Quentin J.M. Huys

  • Computational Psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness

    Rick A Adams;Quentin J M Huys;Jonathan P Roiser

  • Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age

    Rumana Chowdhury;Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Christian Lambert;Christian Lambert;Peter Dayan

  • The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources

    Falk Lieder;Falk Lieder;Thomas L. Griffiths;Thomas L. Griffiths;Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Noah D. Goodman

  • Interplay of approximate planning strategies

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Níall Lally;Níall Lally;Paul Faulkner;Neir Eshel

  • Ventral striatal dopamine reflects behavioral and neural signatures of model-based control during sequential decision making

    Lorenz Deserno;Lorenz Deserno;Lorenz Deserno;Quentin J. M. Huys;Rebecca Boehme;Ralph Buchert

  • Striatal dysfunction during reversal learning in unmedicated schizophrenia patients

    Florian Schlagenhauf;Quentin J. M. Huys;Lorenz Deserno;Michael A. Rapp

  • Serotonin, Inhibition, and Negative Mood

    Peter Dayan;Quentin J. M Huys;Quentin J. M Huys

  • Action Dominates Valence in Anticipatory Representations in the Human Striatum and Dopaminergic Midbrain

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Lluis Fuentemilla;Dominik R. Bach;Quentin J. M. Huys

  • Depression: A Decision-Theoretic Analysis

    Quentin J.M. Huys;Nathaniel Douglass Daw;Peter Dayan

  • Frontal Theta Overrides Pavlovian Learning Biases

    James F. Cavanagh;Ian Eisenberg;Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin Huys

  • Model-based and model-free decisions in alcohol dependence

    Miriam Sebold;Lorenz Deserno;Lorenz Deserno;Stephan Nebe;Daniel J Schad

  • Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis

    Klaas E Stephan;Klaas E Stephan;Klaas E Stephan;Dominik R Bach;Dominik R Bach;Paul C Fletcher;Jonathan Flint

  • Efficient Estimation of Detailed Single-Neuron Models

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Misha B. Ahrens;Liam Paninski

  • Machine learning and big data in psychiatry: toward clinical applications.

    Robb B. Rutledge;Adam M. Chekroud;Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys

  • Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age (vol 16, pg 648, 2013)

    R Chowdhury;M Guitart-Masip;C Lambert;P Dayan

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Dayan
Peter Dayan Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Andreas Heinz
Andreas Heinz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Florian Schlagenhauf
Florian Schlagenhauf Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Klaas E. Stephan
Klaas E. Stephan University of Zurich
Michael A. Rapp
Michael A. Rapp University of Potsdam
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Lorenz Deserno
Lorenz Deserno University of Wurzburg
Henrik Walter
Henrik Walter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a variety of online degree options and exciting professional pathways. Many students pursue degrees that can lead to licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), a common requirement for those seeking to provide mental health services in different states.

Each state has its own set of licensure requirements for counselors. For example, those interested in becoming counselors in South Carolina should review the South Carolina licensed professional counselor requirements. If you plan to work in South Dakota, you must familiarize yourself with the lpc license requirements in South Dakota.

Tennessee and Texas also maintain their unique processes. To practice in Tennessee, you'll need to understand the Tennessee lpc licensure requirements, while prospective counselors in the Lone Star State should follow the steps on how to get an lpc license in Texas.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can provide the educational background needed to meet these requirements, offering flexible pathways to both licensure and a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Quentin J. M. Huys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles