World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
92
Citations
30435
World Ranking
1026
National Ranking
79

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
30445
World Ranking
11329
National Ranking
612

Emrah Düzel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emrah Düzel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 511 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emrah Düzel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emrah Düzel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emrah Düzel is affiliated with the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, physiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scope of Düzel's scientific inquiry includes topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, memory and neural mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, and neurological disease mechanisms and treatments.

Frequent collaborators in Düzel's body of work include Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Oliver Peters, Jens Wiltfang, and Josef Priller. Their joint research contributions indicate a sustained engagement with specialists across overlapping domains of neurodegenerative disease and neuroimaging.

Düzel has published extensively in several notable venues, most prominently in Alzheimer's & Dementia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, Neurology, and Nature Communications.

Recent significant publications illustrate Düzel's contributions to understanding neurodegenerative diseases and related biomarkers. Selected papers include:

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age, 2021, Neurology
  • Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis for Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, 2022, Acta Neuropathologica

Best Publications

  • New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

    Unknown

  • Reward-related fMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation

    B. C. Wittmann;B. H. Schott;S. Guderian;J. U. Frey

  • Absolute Coding of Stimulus Novelty in the Human Substantia Nigra/VTA

    Nico Bunzeck;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory

    Emrah Düzel;Andrew P. Yonelinas;George R Mangun;Hans Jochen Heinze

  • Running-Induced Systemic Cathepsin B Secretion Is Associated with Memory Function.

    Hyo Youl Moon;Andreas Becke;David Berron;Benjamin Becker

  • Mesolimbic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activations during Reward Anticipation Correlate with Reward-Related Ventral Striatal Dopamine Release

    Björn H Schott;Luciano Minuzzi;Ruth M Krebs;David Elmenhorst

  • A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine-dependent late LTP

    John Lisman;Anthony A. Grace;Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel

  • Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin J.M. Huys;Quentin J.M. Huys;Lluis Fuentemilla;Peter Dayan

  • Brain oscillations and memory.

    Emrah Düzel;Will D Penny;Neil Burgess;Neil Burgess

  • Vascular hippocampal plasticity after aerobic exercise in older adults

    A. Maass;Sandra Düzel;M. Goerke;A. Becke

  • Relationships of peripheral IGF-1, VEGF and BDNF levels to exercise-related changes in memory, hippocampal perfusion and volumes in older adults

    Anne Maass;Anne Maass;Sandra Düzel;Tanja Brigadski;Monique Goerke

  • Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function

    Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel;Henriette van Praag;Michael Sendtner

  • Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval

    Emrah Düzel;Roberto Cabeza;Terence W. Picton;Andrew P. Yonelinas

  • Locus coeruleus imaging as a biomarker for noradrenergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases

    Matthew J Betts;Matthew J Betts;Evgeniya Kirilina;Evgeniya Kirilina;Maria C G Otaduy;Dimo Ivanov

  • Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage

    E. Düzel;F. Vargha-Khadem;H. J. Heinze;M. Mishkin

  • Action versus valence in decision making

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Emrah Duzel;Ray Dolan;Peter Dayan

  • Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection

    Bianca C. Wittmann;Nico Bunzeck;Raymond J. Dolan;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age

    Rumana Chowdhury;Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Christian Lambert;Christian Lambert;Peter Dayan

  • Medial temporal theta state before an event predicts episodic encoding success in humans.

    Sebastian Guderian;Björn H. Schott;Alan Richardson-Klavehn;Emrah Düzel

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores

    Itziar de Rojas;Itziar de Rojas;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Niccolo Tesi;Benjamin Grenier-Boley

  • Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age

    Martin Lövdén;Nils Christian Bodammer;Simone Kühn;Jörn Kaufmann

  • Human Hippocampal and Parahippocampal Activity during Visual Associative Recognition Memory for Spatial and Nonspatial Stimulus Configurations

    Emrah Düzel;Reza Habib;Michael Rotte;Sebastian Guderian

  • Functional subregions of the human entorhinal cortex

    Anne Maass;David Berron;David Berron;Laura A Libby;Charan Ranganath

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael T. Heneka
Michael T. Heneka University Hospital Bonn
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Björn H. Schott
Björn H. Schott University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to many flexible education options. For students seeking fast-track ways to specialize or complement their studies, online certification courses offer targeted skills and can lead to in-demand, well-paying roles in healthcare, data analysis, or research support.

Many aspiring professionals are interested in online college courses for their accessibility and adaptability, making it easier to pursue neuroscience or related fields alongside work or other obligations.

If your interests intersect with psychology, counseling, or social work, there are also msw online programs offering affordable and accredited paths to careers in mental health and social services.

For those interested in behavior analysis, fully remote, reputable bcba accredited programs online can prepare you for certification and careers in clinical, educational, or research settings.

These diverse online study options ensure that whether you’re building a foundational knowledge base or aiming for specialized credentials, there is a pathway to fit almost any schedule or career goal.

Best Scientists Citing Emrah Düzel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles