World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 92 1026 919 79 75 511 30435
Medicine 92 11328 10649 613 589 499 30445

Emrah Düzel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emrah Düzel between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emrah Düzel published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 20.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2023. 140 of the 629 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2023. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 48 publications 2023: 81 publications 2024: 79 publications 2025: 61 publications
1995 2025

629 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emrah Düzel: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 9
2007 4
2008 17
2009 13
2010 19
2011 16
2012 11
2013 15
2014 13
2015 13
2016 14
2017 21
2018 40
2019 35
2020 43
2021 45
2022 48
2023 81
2024 79
2025 61
Total 629
Download as CSV

Emrah Düzel publications per year - data summary

  • Emrah Düzel, a Neuroscience scholar from German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, has 629 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 81 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996 and 1997, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 31 years in the span carries no publications at all (1998).
  • The rate of publication averages 20.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 21.0 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 314 publications, 50% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 32 publications (2.9 per year); 2006-2016: 144 publications (13.1 per year); 2017-2025: 453 publications (50.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Emrah Düzel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emrah Düzel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 508–517 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 511 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26 511
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Emrah Düzel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Emrah Düzel, a Neuroscience scholar from German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, records 511 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Emrah Düzel, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Emrah Düzel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Emrah Düzel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emrah Düzel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85 92
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Emrah Düzel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Emrah Düzel, a Neuroscience scholar from German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, records 92 D-Index - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Emrah Düzel, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Emrah Düzel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Emrah Düzel is affiliated with the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, physiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scope of Düzel's scientific inquiry includes topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, memory and neural mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, and neurological disease mechanisms and treatments.

Frequent collaborators in Düzel's body of work include Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Oliver Peters, Jens Wiltfang, and Josef Priller. Their joint research contributions indicate a sustained engagement with specialists across overlapping domains of neurodegenerative disease and neuroimaging.

Düzel has published extensively in several notable venues, most prominently in Alzheimer's & Dementia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, Neurology, and Nature Communications.

Recent significant publications illustrate Düzel's contributions to understanding neurodegenerative diseases and related biomarkers. Selected papers include:

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age, 2021, Neurology
  • Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis for Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, 2022, Acta Neuropathologica

Best Publications

  • Reward-related fMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation

    B. C. Wittmann;B. H. Schott;S. Guderian;J. U. Frey

  • Absolute Coding of Stimulus Novelty in the Human Substantia Nigra/VTA

    Nico Bunzeck;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory

    Emrah Düzel;Andrew P. Yonelinas;George R Mangun;Hans Jochen Heinze

  • Running-Induced Systemic Cathepsin B Secretion Is Associated with Memory Function.

    Hyo Youl Moon;Andreas Becke;David Berron;Benjamin Becker

  • Mesolimbic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activations during Reward Anticipation Correlate with Reward-Related Ventral Striatal Dopamine Release

    Björn H Schott;Luciano Minuzzi;Ruth M Krebs;David Elmenhorst

  • A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine-dependent late LTP

    John Lisman;Anthony A. Grace;Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel

  • Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin J.M. Huys;Quentin J.M. Huys;Lluis Fuentemilla;Peter Dayan

  • Brain oscillations and memory.

    Emrah Düzel;Will D Penny;Neil Burgess;Neil Burgess

  • Vascular hippocampal plasticity after aerobic exercise in older adults

    A. Maass;Sandra Düzel;M. Goerke;A. Becke

  • Relationships of peripheral IGF-1, VEGF and BDNF levels to exercise-related changes in memory, hippocampal perfusion and volumes in older adults

    Anne Maass;Anne Maass;Sandra Düzel;Tanja Brigadski;Monique Goerke

  • Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function

    Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel;Henriette van Praag;Michael Sendtner

  • Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval

    Emrah Düzel;Roberto Cabeza;Terence W. Picton;Andrew P. Yonelinas

  • Locus coeruleus imaging as a biomarker for noradrenergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases

    Matthew J Betts;Matthew J Betts;Evgeniya Kirilina;Evgeniya Kirilina;Maria C G Otaduy;Dimo Ivanov

  • Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage

    E. Düzel;F. Vargha-Khadem;H. J. Heinze;M. Mishkin

  • Action versus valence in decision making

    Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Emrah Duzel;Ray Dolan;Peter Dayan

  • Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection

    Bianca C. Wittmann;Nico Bunzeck;Raymond J. Dolan;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age

    Rumana Chowdhury;Marc Guitart-Masip;Marc Guitart-Masip;Christian Lambert;Christian Lambert;Peter Dayan

  • Medial temporal theta state before an event predicts episodic encoding success in humans.

    Sebastian Guderian;Björn H. Schott;Alan Richardson-Klavehn;Emrah Düzel

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores

    Itziar de Rojas;Itziar de Rojas;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Niccolo Tesi;Benjamin Grenier-Boley

  • Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age

    Martin Lövdén;Nils Christian Bodammer;Simone Kühn;Jörn Kaufmann

  • Human Hippocampal and Parahippocampal Activity during Visual Associative Recognition Memory for Spatial and Nonspatial Stimulus Configurations

    Emrah Düzel;Reza Habib;Michael Rotte;Sebastian Guderian

  • Functional subregions of the human entorhinal cortex

    Anne Maass;David Berron;David Berron;Laura A Libby;Charan Ranganath

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael T. Heneka
Michael T. Heneka University Hospital Bonn
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Björn H. Schott
Björn H. Schott University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to many flexible education options. For students seeking fast-track ways to specialize or complement their studies, online certification courses offer targeted skills and can lead to in-demand, well-paying roles in healthcare, data analysis, or research support.

Many aspiring professionals are interested in online college courses for their accessibility and adaptability, making it easier to pursue neuroscience or related fields alongside work or other obligations.

If your interests intersect with psychology, counseling, or social work, there are also msw online programs offering affordable and accredited paths to careers in mental health and social services.

For those interested in behavior analysis, fully remote, reputable bcba accredited programs online can prepare you for certification and careers in clinical, educational, or research settings.

These diverse online study options ensure that whether you’re building a foundational knowledge base or aiming for specialized credentials, there is a pathway to fit almost any schedule or career goal.

Best Scientists Citing Emrah Düzel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles