World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
20021
World Ranking
3608
National Ranking
321

Simon Hanslmayr publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Hanslmayr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Simon Hanslmayr D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Hanslmayr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon Hanslmayr is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Neuroscience, with significant contributions to Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Neurology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers various topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Hanslmayr's recent publications illustrate a focus on neural oscillations and episodic memory. Selected recent papers include:

  • "The hippocampus as the switchboard between perception and memory," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Disentangling neocortical alpha/beta and hippocampal theta/gamma oscillations in human episodic memory formation," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Theta rhythmicity governs human behavior and hippocampal signals during memory-dependent tasks," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Hippocampal neurons code individual episodic memories in humans," 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Alpha/beta power decreases during episodic memory formation predict the magnitude of alpha/beta power decreases during subsequent retrieval," 2021, Neuropsychologia

Research has been published frequently in several venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Biology
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Nature Communications

Collaboration forms a considerable part of Hanslmayr's work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Bernhard P. Staresina
  • Maria Wimber
  • Luca D. Kolibius
  • Kimron L. Shapiro
  • David T. Rollings

Best Publications

  • EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis

    Wolfgang Klimesch;Paul Sauseng;Simon Hanslmayr

  • A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity

    Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Waltraud Stadler;M. Schabus

  • Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects.

    Simon Hanslmayr;Alp Aslan;Tobias Staudigl;Wolfgang Klimesch

  • Increasing individual upper alpha power by neurofeedback improves cognitive performance in human subjects.

    Simon Hanslmayr;Paul Sauseng;Michael Doppelmayr;Manuel Schabus

  • Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting

    Michael C. Anderson;Michael C. Anderson;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Oscillatory power decreases and long-term memory: the information via desynchronization hypothesis

    Simon Hanslmayr;Tobias Staudigl;Marie-Christin Fellner

  • EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task

    Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Michael Doppelmayr;Thomas Pecherstorfer

  • The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the stroop task

    Simon Hanslmayr;Bernhard Pastötter;Karl-Heinz Bäuml;Sieglinde Gruber

  • The role of alpha oscillations in temporal attention

    Simon Hanslmayr;Joachim Gross;Wolfgang Klimesch;Kimron L. Shapiro

  • Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion.

    P. Sauseng;W. Klimesch;W.R. Gruber;S. Hanslmayr

  • Oscillations and Episodic Memory: Addressing the Synchronization/Desynchronization Conundrum

    Simon Hanslmayr;Bernhard P. Staresina;Howard Bowman

  • Brain Oscillations Dissociate between Semantic and Nonsemantic Encoding of Episodic Memories

    Simon Hanslmayr;Bernhard Spitzer;Karl-Heinz Bäuml

  • Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics

    Wolfgang Klimesch;Paul Sauseng;Simon Hanslmayr;Walter Roland Gruber

  • How brain oscillations form memories — A processing based perspective on oscillatory subsequent memory effects

    Simon Hanslmayr;Tobias Staudigl

  • Hippocampal-Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Support Memory Integration

    Alexander R. Backus;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Szabolcs Szebényi;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Visual discrimination performance is related to decreased alpha amplitude but increased phase locking

    Simon Hanslmayr;Wolfgang Klimesch;Paul Sauseng;Walter Gruber

  • Theta oscillations at encoding mediate the context-dependent nature of human episodic memory

    Tobias Staudigl;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Theta coupling in the human electroencephalogram during a working memory task

    Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Michael Doppelmayr;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Upper alpha ERD and absolute power: their meaning for memory performance.

    Wolfgang Klimesch;Michael Doppelmayr;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Modulating Human Memory via Entrainment of Brain Oscillations.

    Simon Hanslmayr;Nikolai Axmacher;Cory S. Inman

  • Alpha Phase Reset Contributes to the Generation of ERPs

    Simon Hanslmayr;Wolfgang Klimesch;Paul Sauseng;Paul Sauseng;Walter Gruber

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Klimesch
Wolfgang Klimesch University of Salzburg
Karl-Heinz T. Bäuml
Karl-Heinz T. Bäuml University of Regensburg
Bernhard P. Staresina
Bernhard P. Staresina University of Birmingham
Howard Bowman
Howard Bowman University of Birmingham
Karen J. Mullinger
Karen J. Mullinger University of Nottingham
Michael Doppelmayr
Michael Doppelmayr Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Kimron L. Shapiro
Kimron L. Shapiro University of Birmingham
Nikolai Axmacher
Nikolai Axmacher Ruhr University Bochum
Hajo M. Hamer
Hajo M. Hamer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Mark W. Greenlee
Mark W. Greenlee University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Simon Hanslmayr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles