World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
14944
World Ranking
3789
National Ranking
96

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
14918
World Ranking
14832
National Ranking
361

Petra M. Visser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra M. Visser sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 99 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Petra M. Visser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra M. Visser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria, Microcystin, Ecology, Algal bloom and Microcystis are her primary areas of study. The concepts of her Microcystin study are interwoven with issues in Toxin and Botany. Her Ecology study is mostly concerned with Algae and Bloom.

Her studies deal with areas such as Microcystis aeruginosa and Eutrophication as well as Algal bloom. Her study connects Microbiology and Microcystis. Her Phytoplankton research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Oceanography and Plankton.

Her most cited work include:

  • Summer heatwaves promote blooms of harmful cyanobacteria (669 citations)
  • Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species (439 citations)
  • Effects of light on the microcystin content of Microcystis strain PCC 7806. (242 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Petra M. Visser mostly deals with Ecology, Microcystis, Cyanobacteria, Eutrophication and Microcystin. Her studies in Phytoplankton, Algal bloom, Coral reef, Benthic zone and Bloom are all subfields of Ecology research. She interconnects Buoyancy, Water column, Algae, Sedimentation and Animal science in the investigation of issues within Microcystis.

Her Cyanobacteria study which covers Botany that intersects with Biophysics and Artificial mixing. Her work carried out in the field of Eutrophication brings together such families of science as Dominance, Green algae and Ecosystem, Freshwater ecosystem. Her Microcystin study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Photosynthesis, Toxin and Microcystis aeruginosa.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (37.93%)
  • Microcystis (32.18%)
  • Cyanobacteria (32.18%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Cyanobacteria (32.18%)
  • Eutrophication (24.14%)
  • Microcystin (22.99%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Petra M. Visser mainly investigates Cyanobacteria, Eutrophication, Microcystin, Ecology and Hydrogen peroxide. Her Eutrophication study incorporates themes from Ecosystem, Surface runoff, Water resources, Environmental chemistry and Oceanography. The study incorporates disciplines such as Extracellular, Microcystis aeruginosa and Cylindrospermopsin in addition to Microcystin.

Her Hydrogen peroxide research integrates issues from Photosynthesis, Green algae, Freshwater ecosystem and Microcystis. Her Microcystis research includes elements of Food science, Interspecific competition, Algal bloom, Chlorella and Nutrient. Her Benthic zone research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Biomass, Bloom, Herbivore and Substrate.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Temperature Effects Explain Continental Scale Distribution of Cyanobacterial Toxins (87 citations)
  • Reefs under Siege—the Rise, Putative Drivers, and Consequences of Benthic Cyanobacterial Mats (21 citations)
  • Diurnal changes of cyanobacteria blooms in Taihu Lake as derived from GOCI observations (19 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Bacteria

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecosystem, Microcystis aeruginosa, Zoology, Bloom and Atmospheric correction. Her Ecosystem research incorporates elements of Climate change, Nutrient pollution and Environmental resource management. She combines subjects such as Toxin, Anatoxin-a, Cyanobacteria, Microcystin-LR and Nodularin with her study of Zoology.

Petra M. Visser has researched Toxin in several fields, including Cylindrospermopsin and Microcystin. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Diel vertical migration, Atmospheric sciences and Seasonality. Petra M. Visser performs multidisciplinary study on Atmospheric correction and Hotspot in her works.

Best Publications

  • Cyanobacterial blooms

    Unknown

  • Summer heatwaves promote blooms of harmful cyanobacteria

    Klaus D. Jöhnk;Jef Huisman;Jonathan Sharples;Ben Sommeijer

  • Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species

    Jef Huisman;Jonathan Sharples;Jasper M. Stroom;Petra M. Visser

  • How rising CO2 and global warming may stimulate harmful cyanobacterial blooms

    Petra M. Visser;Jolanda M.H. Verspagen;Giovanni Sandrini;Lucas J. Stal

  • Effects of light on the microcystin content of Microcystis strain PCC 7806.

    Claudia Wiedner;Petra M. Visser;Jutta Fastner;James S. Metcalf

  • Selective suppression of harmful cyanobacteria in an entire lake with hydrogen peroxide

    Hans C.P. Matthijs;Petra M. Visser;Bart Reeze;Jeroen Meeuse

  • Artificial mixing to control cyanobacterial blooms: a review

    Petra M. Visser;Bastiaan Willem Ibelings;Myriam Bormans;Jef Huisman

  • Global solutions to regional problems: Collecting global expertise to address the problem of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. A Lake Erie case study.

    George S. Bullerjahn;Robert M. McKay;Timothy W. Davis;David B. Baker

  • Artificial mixing prevents nuisance blooms of the cyanobacterium Microcystis in Lake Nieuwe Meer, the Netherlands

    P. M. Visser;Bastiaan Willem Ibelings;B. van der Veer;J. Koedood

  • The ecological stoichiometry of toxins produced by harmful cyanobacteria: an experimental test of the carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis

    Dedmer B. Van de Waal;Jolanda M. H. Verspagen;Miquel Lürling;Ellen Van Donk

  • Salt tolerance of the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa

    Linda Tonk;Kim Bosch;Petra M. Visser;Jef Huisman

  • Competition for Light between Toxic and Nontoxic Strains of the Harmful Cyanobacterium Microcystis

    W. Edwin A. Kardinaal;Linda Tonk;Ingmar Janse;Suzanne Hol

  • The Effects of Nutrient Enrichment and Herbivore Abundance on the Ability of Turf Algae to Overgrow Coral in the Caribbean

    Mark J. A. Vermeij;Imke van Moorselaar;Sarah Engelhard;Christine Hörnlein

  • Reversal in competitive dominance of a toxic versus non-toxic cyanobacterium in response to rising CO2.

    Dedmer B Van de Waal;Jolanda M H Verspagen;Jan F Finke;Jan F Finke;Vasiliki Vournazou

  • Rising CO2 levels will intensify phytoplankton blooms in eutrophic and hypertrophic lakes

    Jolanda M. H. Verspagen;Dedmer B. Van de Waal;Jan F. Finke;Petra M. Visser

  • The microcystin composition of the cyanobacterium Planktothrix agardhii changes toward a more toxic variant with increasing light intensity.

    Linda Tonk;Petra M. Visser;Guntram Christiansen;Elke Dittmann

  • Temperature Effects Explain Continental Scale Distribution of Cyanobacterial Toxins

    Evanthia Mantzouki;Miquel Lürling;Jutta Fastner;Lisette de Senerpont Domis

  • Microcystis genotype succession in relation to microcystin concentrations in freshwater lakes

    W.E.A. Kardinaal;I. Janse;M.P. Kamst-van Agterveld;M. Meima

  • Modelling vertical migration of the cyanobacterium Microcystis

    Petra M. Visser;Jutta Passarge;Jutta Passarge;Luuc R. Mur

  • Stratification strength and light climate explain variation in chlorophyll a at the continental scale in a European multilake survey in a heatwave summer

    Daphne Donis;Evanthia Mantzouki;Daniel F. McGinnis;Dominic Vachon;Dominic Vachon

  • Toxic and Nontoxic Microcystis Colonies in Natural Populations Can Be Differentiated on the Basis of rRNA Gene Internal Transcribed Spacer Diversity

    I. Janse;W.E.A. Kardinaal;M. Meima;J. Fastner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jef Huisman
Jef Huisman University of Amsterdam
Luuc R. Mur
Luuc R. Mur University of Amsterdam
Mark J. A. Vermeij
Mark J. A. Vermeij University of Amsterdam
Bastiaan Willem Ibelings
Bastiaan Willem Ibelings University of Geneva
Jutta Fastner
Jutta Fastner Environment Agency
Dedmer B. Van de Waal
Dedmer B. Van de Waal University of Amsterdam
Hans W. Paerl
Hans W. Paerl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Myriam Bormans
Myriam Bormans Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Hans-Peter Grossart
Hans-Peter Grossart University of Potsdam
Miquel Lürling
Miquel Lürling Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a diverse field that intersects with various disciplines, making online degree options attractive for career advancement and specialization. For those interested in spatial analysis and mapping, pursuing one of the best GIS programs in the US offers practical skills widely applicable in environmental research and policy planning.

Public administration also plays a crucial role in environmental governance. Many professionals benefit from flexible study options like the easiest online MPA programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors focusing on sustainable development and resource management.

Understanding social factors is essential in addressing environmental challenges. Online social sciences study pathways such as the best online bachelors in sociology programs provide a strong foundation in human behavior, community engagement, and policy impact relevant to environmental issues.

For those interested in teaching or advanced research without the extended commitment of a dissertation, exploring online Ed D programs without dissertation can be an efficient path to doctoral credentials that support environmental education and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Petra M. Visser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles