World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
94
Citations
57085
World Ranking
1955
National Ranking
22

Ole Lund publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Lund sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 272 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ole Lund D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Lund sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ole Lund is affiliated with the Danish National Genome Center in Denmark and focuses research efforts in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant intersection in agricultural and biological sciences.

Their primary research interests span several subfields, including molecular biology, ecology, plant science, genetics, and clinical biochemistry. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding biological systems at both molecular and ecological levels.

Key topics covered in their work include genomics and phylogenetic studies, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, probiotics and fermented foods, microbial community ecology and physiology, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and genetic associations and epidemiology.

Ole Lund's publication record includes articles in various scientific venues. Frequent publication platforms include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with five papers, mSystems with three papers, Scientific Reports with three papers, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine with two papers, and the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. This distribution indicates engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed journals across microbiology and related disciplines.

The following are examples of recent publications:

  • "ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes," 2020, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • In Silico Genotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates for Extraintestinal Virulence Genes by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data, 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • "CCMetagen: comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data," 2020, Genome Biology
  • "Prediction of Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance for Multiple Bacterial Species Using Neural Networks," 2020, mSystems
  • "Diversity, plant growth-promoting traits, and biocontrol potential of fungal endophytes of Sorghum bicolor," 2020, Plant Pathology

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research activity, with frequent coauthors including Frank M. Aarestrup and Philip T. L. C. Clausen, each having coauthored 11 publications alongside Ole Lund. Other regular collaborators are Derya Aytan-Aktug and Judit Szarvas, each with six coauthored works, and Sébastien Matamoros with four joint papers.

Best Publications

  • Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes

    Ea Zankari;Henrik Hasman;Salvatore Cosentino;Martin Vestergaard

  • In Silico Detection and Typing of Plasmids using PlasmidFinder and Plasmid Multilocus Sequence Typing

    Alessandra Carattoli;Ea Zankari;Aurora García-Fernández;Mette Voldby Larsen

  • ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes.

    Valeria Bortolaia;Rolf S Kaas;Etienne Ruppe;Marilyn C Roberts

  • Multilocus Sequence Typing of Total-Genome-Sequenced Bacteria

    Mette V. Larsen;Salvatore Cosentino;Simon Rasmussen;Carsten Friis

  • Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes.

    Jens Erik Pontoppidan Larsen;Ole Lund;Morten Nielsen

  • Real-Time Whole-Genome Sequencing for Routine Typing, Surveillance, and Outbreak Detection of Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli

    Katrine Grimstrup Joensen;Flemming Scheutz;Ole Lund;Henrik Hasman

  • Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations

    Morten Nielsen;Claus Lundegaard;Peder Worning;Sanne Lise Lauemøller

  • Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes

    H Bjørn Nielsen;Mathieu Almeida;Agnieszka Sierakowska Juncker;Simon Rasmussen

  • Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage

    Rene S. Hendriksen;Patrick Munk;Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage;Bram van Bunnik

  • Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope prediction

    Mette V Larsen;Claus Lundegaard;Kasper Lamberth;Soren Buus

  • NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8–11

    Claus Lundegaard;Kasper Lamberth;Mikkel Harndahl;Søren Buus

  • Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms.

    Rolf Sommer Kaas;Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon;Frank Møller Aarestrup;Ole Lund

  • An Aboriginal Australian Genome Reveals Separate Human Dispersals into Asia

    Morten Rasmussen;Xiaosen Guo;Yong Wang;Kirk E. Lohmueller

  • NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans

    Ilka Hoof;Bjoern Peters;John Sidney;Lasse Eggers Pedersen

  • Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing

    Miriam L. Land;Loren Hauser;Se-Ran Jun;Intawat Nookaew

  • NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence.

    Morten A. Nielsen;Claus Lundegaard;Thomas H. Blicher;Kasper Lamberth

  • Prediction of residues in discontinuous B-cell epitopes using protein 3D structures

    Pernille Haste Andersen;Morten Nielsen;Ole Lund

  • Peptide binding predictions for HLA DR, DP and DQ molecules

    Peng Wang;John Sidney;Yohan Kim;Alessandro Sette

  • Computational Immunology Meets Bioinformatics: The Use of Prediction Tools for Molecular Binding in the Simulation of the Immune System

    Nicolas Rapin;Ole Lund;Massimo Bernaschi;Filippo Castiglione

  • Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking.

    Jens Vindahl Kringelum;Claus Lundegaard;Ole Lund;Morten Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten Nielsen
Morten Nielsen Technical University of Denmark
Frank Møller Aarestrup
Frank Møller Aarestrup Technical University of Denmark
Søren Brunak
Søren Brunak University of Copenhagen
Søren Buus
Søren Buus University of Copenhagen
Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén
Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén University of Copenhagen
Alessandro Sette
Alessandro Sette La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Henrik Hasman
Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut
Bjoern Peters
Bjoern Peters La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
David W. Ussery
David W. Ussery University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Simon Rasmussen
Simon Rasmussen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ole Lund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles