World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
10762
World Ranking
4367
National Ranking
27

Nathan Weisz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Weisz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 222 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nathan Weisz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Weisz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan Weisz is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics including neural dynamics and brain function, hearing loss and rehabilitation, multisensory perception and integration, neuroscience and music perception, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Their publication record includes numerous papers in prominent venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Psychophysiology, eLife, NeuroImage, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). The highest number of publications appear in bioRxiv, followed by shorter runs in Psychophysiology and eLife.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Nathan Weisz include Gianpaolo Demarchi, Anne Hauswald, Fabian Schmidt, Thomas Hartmann, and Nina Suess, demonstrating consistent teamwork across multiple studies.

The list of recent papers includes:

  • Recommendations and publication guidelines for studies using frequency domain and time-frequency domain analyses of neural time series, 2022, Psychophysiology
  • Decoding across sensory modalities reveals common supramodal signatures of conscious perception, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently, 2020, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • An Introduction to the Objective Psychophysics Toolbox, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Ageing as risk factor for tinnitus and its complex interplay with hearing loss-evidence from online and NHANES data, 2023, BMC Medicine

Their expertise is reflected in the subfields of study they have contributed to, including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Neurology
  • Signal Processing

Main fields and topics of their work cover:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Best Publications

  • Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm.

    Nadia Müller;Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann;Isabel Lorenz

  • Tinnitus Perception and Distress Is Related to Abnormal Spontaneous Brain Activity as Measured by Magnetoencephalography

    Nathan Weisz;Stephan Moratti;Marcus Meinzer;Katalin Dohrmann

  • The Neural Code of Auditory Phantom Perception

    Nathan Weisz;Simona Müller;Winfried Schlee;Katalin Dohrmann

  • An integrative model of auditory phantom perception: tinnitus as a unified percept of interacting separable subnetworks.

    Dirk De Ridder;Sven Vanneste;Nathan Weisz;Alain Londero

  • High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation.

    Nathan Weisz;Thomas Hartmann;Katalin Dohrmann;Winfried Schlee

  • Alpha rhythms in audition : cognitive and clinical perspectives

    Nathan Weisz;Thomas Hartmann;Nadia Müller;Isabel Lorenz

  • Abnormal resting-state cortical coupling in chronic tinnitus

    Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann;Berthold Langguth;Nathan Weisz

  • Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)

    Dirk De Ridder;Winfried Schlee;Sven Vanneste;Alain Londero

  • Mapping cortical hubs in tinnitus

    Winfried Schlee;Nadia Mueller;Thomas Hartmann;Julian Keil

  • Suppressed Alpha Oscillations Predict Intelligibility of Speech and its Acoustic Details

    Jonas Obleser;Nathan Weisz

  • Prestimulus oscillatory power and connectivity patterns predispose conscious somatosensory perception

    Nathan Weisz;Anja Wühle;Gianpiero Monittola;Gianpaolo Demarchi;Gianpaolo Demarchi

  • The relevance of spontaneous activity for the coding of the tinnitus sensation.

    Nathan Weisz;Katalin Dohrmann;Thomas Elbert

  • Using Auditory Steady State Responses to Outline the Functional Connectivity in the Tinnitus Brain

    Winfried Schlee;Nathan Weisz;Nathan Weisz;Olivier Bertrand;Thomas Hartmann

  • Temporo-insular enhancement of EEG low and high frequencies in patients with chronic tinnitus. QEEG study of chronic tinnitus patients

    Morteza Moazami-Goudarzi;Morteza Moazami-Goudarzi;Lars Michels;Nathan Weisz;Daniel Jeanmonod

  • Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus.

    Christian Wienbruch;Isabella Paul;Nathan Weisz;Thomas Elbert

  • On the variability of the McGurk effect: audiovisual integration depends on prestimulus brain states.

    Julian Keil;Nadia Müller;Niklas Ihssen;Nathan Weisz

  • Neurofeedback for treating tinnitus.

    Katalin Dohrmann;Nathan Weisz;Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann

  • Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements

    Andreas Wutz;Andreas Wutz;Evelyn Muschter;Martijn G. van Koningsbruggen;Martijn G. van Koningsbruggen;Nathan Weisz;Nathan Weisz

  • Friends, not foes: Magnetoencephalography as a tool to uncover brain dynamics during transcranial alternating current stimulation

    Toralf Neuling;Philipp Ruhnau;Marco Fuscà;Gianpaolo Demarchi

  • Eyes wide shut: Transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner.

    Philipp Ruhnau;Toralf Neuling;Toralf Neuling;Marco Fuscá;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Neuromagnetic indicators of auditory cortical reorganization of tinnitus

    Nathan Weisz;Christian Wienbruch;Katalin Dohrmann;Thomas Elbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Winfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee University of Regensburg
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Gregory A. Miller
Gregory A. Miller University of California, Los Angeles
Christoph Braun
Christoph Braun University of Tübingen
Sven Vanneste
Sven Vanneste Trinity College Dublin
Christian Wienbruch
Christian Wienbruch University of Konstanz
Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and related career pathways. Many students interested in understanding the brain, behavior, and mental health also consider fields like psychology, social work, and therapy. For those looking for flexible and cost-effective options, there are several affordable online mft programs for marriage and family therapy, which prepare graduates for careers in counseling and family support.

If you are interested in a broader understanding of human behavior, you might want to explore a masters in psychology. Online programs in psychology are increasingly accessible and suitable for students seeking flexibility. Furthermore, students aiming to manage their expenses can find cheap psychology degree online options, making it easier to pursue higher education without a large financial burden.

For those considering a helping profession, there are also easiest social work programs to get into. These online social work degrees offer pathways to careers dedicated to community welfare and support. Whether you pursue neuroscience or a related field, these degree pathways present diverse opportunities to make a meaningful impact.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan Weisz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles