World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Schecklmann

Martin Schecklmann

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
12191
World Ranking
5057
National Ranking
426

Martin Schecklmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schecklmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 229 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin Schecklmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schecklmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Schecklmann is a researcher affiliated with the University of Regensburg in Germany. The work focuses on the field of neuroscience, with extensive contributions to several subfields including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, psychiatry and mental health, and anesthesiology and pain medicine.

Their research primarily revolves around topics such as transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, hearing and tinnitus genetics, vestibular and auditory disorders, hearing loss and rehabilitation, pain management and treatment, muscle activation and electromyography studies, as well as stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Frequent publication venues for Martin Schecklmann include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Progress in Brain Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Notable papers featuring Martin Schecklmann's contributions are:

  • "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Corrigendum to 'Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)' [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528]," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation reduces tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized clinical study," 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • "A direct comparison of neuronavigated and non-neuronavigated intermittent theta burst stimulation in the treatment of depression," 2021, Brain Stimulation
  • "The Effect of Environmental Stressors on Tinnitus: A Prospective Longitudinal Study on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Martin Schecklmann include:

  • Berthold Langguth
  • Stefan Schoisswohl
  • Tobias Hebel
  • Mohamed A. Abdelnaim
  • Winfried Schlee

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • Empathy in children with autism and conduct disorder: group‐specific profiles and developmental aspects

    Christina Schwenck;Julia Mergenthaler;Katharina Keller;Julie Zech

  • Simulation of near-infrared light absorption considering individual head and prefrontal cortex anatomy: implications for optical neuroimaging.

    Florian B. Haeussinger;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel;Tim Hahn;Tim Hahn;Martin Schecklmann

  • Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)

    Dirk De Ridder;Winfried Schlee;Sven Vanneste;Alain Londero

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a long-term reliable tool for measuring brain activity during verbal fluency.

    Martin Schecklmann;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Michael M. Plichta;Andreas J. Fallgatter

  • Phenotypic characteristics of hyperacusis in tinnitus

    Martin Schecklmann;Michael Landgrebe;Berthold Langguth

  • Neural correlates of tinnitus duration and Distress: A positron emission tomography study

    Martin Schecklmann;Michael Landgrebe;Timm B. Poeppl;Peter Kreuzer

  • Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: retrospective assessment of cardiac safety in a pilot study.

    Peter Michael Kreuzer;Michael Landgrebe;Oliver Husser;Markus Resch

  • Relationship between Audiometric Slope and Tinnitus Pitch in Tinnitus Patients: Insights into the Mechanisms of Tinnitus Generation

    Martin Schecklmann;Veronika Vielsmeier;Thomas Steffens;Michael Landgrebe

  • Treatment of chronic tinnitus with repeated sessions of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: outcomes from an open-label pilot study

    Elmar Frank;Martin Schecklmann;Michael Landgrebe;Julia Burger

  • Insights from the third international conference on hyperacusis: causes, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment

    Hashir Aazh;Marlies Knipper;Ali A. Danesh;Andrea E. Cavanna

  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528].

    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H Benninger

  • Tinnitus assessment by means of standardized self-report questionnaires: psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and their short versions in an international and multi-lingual sample.

    Florian Zeman;Michael Koller;Martin Schecklmann;Berthold Langguth

  • Insomnia in patients with chronic tinnitus: Cognitive and emotional distress as moderator variables.

    Tatjana Crönlein;Berthold Langguth;Maximilian Pregler;Peter M. Kreuzer

  • Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus: An Open Pilot Study

    Peter M. Kreuzer;Michael Landgrebe;Markus Resch;Oliver Husser

  • Efficacy of different protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: Pooled analysis of two randomized controlled studies.

    B Langguth;M Landgrebe;E Frank;M Schecklmann

  • Auditory cortex is implicated in tinnitus distress: a voxel-based morphometry study

    Martin Schecklmann;Astrid Lehner;Timm B Poeppl;Peter M Kreuzer

  • Diminished prefrontal oxygenation with normal and above-average verbal fluency performance in adult ADHD.

    Martin Schecklmann;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Michael M. Plichta;Jasmin Romanos

  • The Relevance of the High Frequency Audiometry in Tinnitus Patients with Normal Hearing in Conventional Pure-Tone Audiometry

    Veronika Vielsmeier;Astrid Lehner;Jürgen Strutz;Thomas Steffens

  • Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Probe State- and Trait-Like Conditions in Chronic Tinnitus: A Proof-of-Principle Study

    Martin Schecklmann;Anette Giani;Sara Tupak;Berthold Langguth

Frequent Co-Authors

Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Winfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee University of Regensburg
Ann-Christine Ehlis
Ann-Christine Ehlis University of Tübingen
Michael M. Plichta
Michael M. Plichta Goethe University Frankfurt
Marcel Romanos
Marcel Romanos University of Würzburg
Thomas Dresler
Thomas Dresler University of Tübingen
Mark W. Greenlee
Mark W. Greenlee University of Regensburg
Paul Pauli
Paul Pauli University of Würzburg
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin Schecklmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles