World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
11750
World Ranking
3709
National Ranking
1700

Emiliano Santarnecchi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiliano Santarnecchi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 261 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emiliano Santarnecchi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiliano Santarnecchi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emiliano Santarnecchi is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their scientific contributions include numerous studies in key topics such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies.

Emiliano Santarnecchi has published extensively in peer-reviewed journals. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Brain stimulation
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Scientific Reports

Some recent papers associated with their research are:

  • "Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Precuneus magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trial," 2022, Brain
  • "Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement," 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • "Individualized perturbation of the human connectome reveals reproducible biomarkers of network dynamics relevant to cognition," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study," 2021, Brain Stimulation

Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authorship with researchers including:

  • Símone Rossi
  • Álvaro Pascual-Leone
  • Sara M. Romanella
  • Giacomo Koch
  • Francesco Neri

Best Publications

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    Simone Rossi;Andrea Antal;Sven Bestmann;Marom Bikson

  • Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper

    Ethan R. Buch;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Andrea Antal;Jan Born

  • Frequency-Dependent Tuning of the Human Motor System Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials

    Matteo Feurra;Giovanni Bianco;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Massimiliano Del Testa

  • Precuneus magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trial

    Unknown

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement

    Unknown

  • Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials.

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Nicola Riccardo Polizzotto;Marco Godone;Fabio Giovannelli

  • Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials

    Clara Fonteneau;Marine Mondino;Martijn Arns;Chris Baeken

  • State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters.

    Matteo Feurra;Patrizio Pasqualetti;Giovanni Bianco;Emiliano Santarnecchi

  • Efficiency of weak brain connections support general cognitive functioning

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Giulia Galli;Nicola Riccardo Polizzotto;Alessandro Rossi

  • Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex.

    David B. Fischer;David B. Fischer;Peter J. Fried;Giulio Ruffini;Oscar Ripolles

  • Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Anna-Katharine Brem;Anna-Katharine Brem;Erica Levenbaum;Todd Thompson

  • Bilateral extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation improves endurance performance in healthy individuals.

    L. Angius;A.R. Mauger;J. Hopker;A. Pascual-Leone

  • Revolution of Alzheimer Precision Neurology. Passageway of Systems Biology and Neurophysiology

    Harald Hampel;Nicola Toschi;Nicola Toschi;Claudio Babiloni;Filippo Baldacci

  • Plasma amyloid β 40/42 ratio predicts cerebral amyloidosis in cognitively normal individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

    Andrea Vergallo;Andrea Vergallo;Lucile Mégret;Simone Lista;Simone Lista;Enrica Cavedo;Enrica Cavedo

  • Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: A computational study.

    Sumientra Rampersad;Biel Roig-Solvas;Mathew Yarossi;Praveen P. Kulkarni

  • Individual differences and specificity of prefrontal gamma frequency-tACS on fluid intelligence capabilities

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi;T. Muller;Simone Rossi;A. Sarkar

  • Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study.

    Alberto Benussi;Valentina Cantoni;Maria Sofia Cotelli;Maria Cotelli

  • Individualized perturbation of the human connectome reveals reproducible biomarkers of network dynamics relevant to cognition

    Recep A. Ozdemir;Ehsan Tadayon;Pierre Boucher;Davide Momi

  • Altered resting-state EEG source functional connectivity in schizophrenia:the effect of illness duration

    Giorgio Di Lorenzo;Andrea Daverio;Fabiola Ferrentino;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi

  • Choroid plexus volume is associated with levels of CSF proteins: relevance for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

    Ehsan Tadayon;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Daniel Press;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi

  • Interaction between Neuroanatomical and Psychological Changes after Mindfulness-Based Training

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Sicilia D’Arista;Eutizio Egiziano;Concetta Gardi

  • The smarter, the stronger: Intelligence level correlates with brain resilience to systematic insults

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Simone Rossi;Alessandro Rossi

  • Artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases: A review of available tools with a focus on machine learning techniques.

    Alexandra-Maria Tăuţan;Bogdan Ionescu;Emiliano Santarnecchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Simone Rossi
Simone Rossi University of Siena
Alessandro Rossi
Alessandro Rossi University of L'Aquila
Giulio Ruffini
Giulio Ruffini Light Prescriptions Innovators (Spain)
Mouhsin M. Shafi
Mouhsin M. Shafi Harvard Medical School
Michael D. Fox
Michael D. Fox Harvard University
Nicola Toschi
Nicola Toschi University of Rome Tor Vergata
Stéphane Lehéricy
Stéphane Lehéricy Sorbonne University
Andrea Fagiolini
Andrea Fagiolini University of Siena
Domenico Prattichizzo
Domenico Prattichizzo University of Siena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open a wide range of educational and career opportunities. For those eager to fast-track their studies, several accelerated bachelors degrees are available online. These programs can help you earn your qualification more quickly, allowing you to enter the workforce or pursue graduate study sooner.

If salary is an important factor in your decision, it's worth reviewing the high paying degrees and fun majors in college that pay well. Neuroscience often overlaps with lucrative careers in healthcare, technology, and research, making it a rewarding field both intellectually and financially.

Budget is another crucial consideration. Fortunately, there are many cheap online colleges that accept FAFSA, helping students minimize debt while accessing quality education. Researching these options can help you make informed decisions about your future in neuroscience and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Emiliano Santarnecchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles