World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
9703
World Ranking
5917
National Ranking
3212

Adam J. Woods publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam J. Woods sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adam J. Woods D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam J. Woods sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam J. Woods is affiliated with the University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and medicine, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and neurology. Their work addresses neural mechanisms and brain function through various advanced neuroimaging and neurostimulation techniques.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Subfields of research involve:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Key topics in their research portfolio encompass:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • GeroScience
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Adam J. Woods feature the following:

  • Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • The Role of Resting-State Network Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Aging, 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response, 2020, Brain Stimulation

Adam J. Woods has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ronald A. Cohen
  • Eric C. Porges
  • Alejandro Albizu
  • Andrew O'Shea
  • Gene E. Alexander

Best Publications

  • A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools

    A.J. Woods;A. Antal;M. Bikson;P.S. Boggio

  • Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

    Marom Bikson;Pnina Grossman;Chris Thomas;Adantchede Louis Zannou

  • Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults.

    Stephen D. Anton;Adam J. Woods;Tetsuo Ashizawa;Diana Barb

  • Cognitive Aging and the Hippocampus in Older Adults.

    Andrew O'Shea;Ronald A Cohen;Eric C Porges;Nicole R Nissim

  • Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: a computational modeling study

    Sudha Kilaru Kessler;Preet Minhas;Adam J. Woods;Alyssa Rosen

  • Frontal Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Concentrations Are Associated With Cognitive Performance in Older Adults

    Eric C. Porges;Adam J. Woods;Adam J. Woods;Richard A.E. Edden;Richard A.E. Edden;Nicolaas A.J. Puts;Nicolaas A.J. Puts

  • Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop

    Marom Bikson;Andre R. Brunoni;Leigh E. Charvet;Vincent P. Clark

  • The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments

    Adam J. Woods;John W. Philbeck;Jerome V. Danoff

  • Effects of 6-month at-home transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease.

    Jooyeon Jamie Im;Hyeonseok Jeong;Marom Bikson;Adam J. Woods

  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Nomenclature

    Marom Bikson;Zeinab Esmaeilpour;Devin Adair;Greg Kronberg

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: A computational modeling study

    Preet Minhas;Marom Bikson;Adam J. Woods;Alyssa R. Rosen

  • The effects of medication use in transcranial direct current stimulation: A brief review.

    Molly E. McLaren;Nicole R. Nissim;Adam J. Woods

  • Frontal Structural Neural Correlates of Working Memory Performance in Older Adults.

    Nicole R. Nissim;Andrew M. O’Shea;Vaughn Bryant;Eric C. Porges

  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Marom Bikson;Colleen A Hanlon;Adam J Woods;Bernadette T Gillick

  • Context modulates the contribution of time and space in causal inference.

    Adam J. Woods;Matthew Lehet;Anjan Chatterjee

  • Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

    Hyochol Ahn;Adam J. Woods;Mark E. Kunik;Abhishek Bhattacharjee

  • Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation using electrical stimulation of the scalp

    Mark S. Mennemeier;William J. Triggs;Kenneth C. Chelette;A.J. Woods

  • Current Heavy Alcohol Consumption is Associated with Greater Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.

    Adam J. Woods;Eric C. Porges;Vaughn E. Bryant;Talia Seider

  • The development of organized visual search

    Adam J. Woods;Tilbe Göksun;Anjan Chatterjee;Sarah Zelonis;Sarah Zelonis

  • Big GABA II: Water-referenced edited MR spectroscopy at 25 research sites

    Mark Mikkelsen;Mark Mikkelsen;Daniel L. Rimbault;Peter B. Barker;Peter B. Barker;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald A. Cohen
Ronald A. Cohen University of Florida
Marom Bikson
Marom Bikson City College of New York
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Gene E. Alexander
Gene E. Alexander University of Arizona
Michael Marsiske
Michael Marsiske University of Florida
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
Richard Anthony Edward Edden
Richard Anthony Edward Edden Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Nicolaas A.J. Puts
Nicolaas A.J. Puts King's College London
Michael A. Nitsche
Michael A. Nitsche TU Dortmund University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider counseling as a rewarding and influential career path. Online degrees in psychology and counseling are increasingly popular, giving students the flexibility to study while managing other responsibilities.

When choosing an online program, factors such as cost, value, program reputation, and graduate success rates are key considerations. For example, students searching for the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Utah will want to weigh both the program’s academic strength and its support for online learners. Affordability is equally important, which is highlighted by guides to the best value counseling degrees in Arizona and the most valuable counseling degrees in Colorado.

For students interested in high-value education in the southeast, the most valuable counseling degrees in Florida present a broad range of quality options. Graduates from these programs are equipped for diverse roles, such as mental health counselors, school counselors, or academic advisors, making online degrees a practical step toward a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Adam J. Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles