World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
14330
World Ranking
3664
National Ranking
207

Adam Kirton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Kirton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 409 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam Kirton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Kirton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Kirton is a researcher affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their work primarily focuses on fields related to Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions to subfields such as Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Epidemiology.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Adam Kirton has published in several frequent venues, notably:

  • Neurology
  • Stroke
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Kirton include:

  • Perinatal stroke: mapping and modulating developmental plasticity, 2021, Nature Reviews Neurology
  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Brain stimulation
  • Population Based Birth Prevalence of Disease-Specific Perinatal Stroke, 2020, PEDIATRICS
  • Spectrum of cerebral arteriopathies in children with arterial ischemic stroke, 2020, Neurology
  • Bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area in children with Tourette syndrome, 2021, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Their frequent collaborators include Helen L. Carlson, Ephrem Zewdie, Maryam Oskoui, John Andersen, and Mary Dunbar, who have contributed alongside Kirton in various research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

    Marom Bikson;Pnina Grossman;Chris Thomas;Adantchede Louis Zannou

  • Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015

    Debbie Hebert;M Patrice Lindsay;M Patrice Lindsay;Amanda McIntyre;Adam Kirton

  • Epidemiology and Outcomes of Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Children: The Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Registry.

    Gabrielle A. deVeber;Adam Kirton;Frances A. Booth;Jerome Y. Yager

  • Symptomatic Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke: The International Pediatric Stroke Study

    Adam Kirton;Jennifer Armstrong-Wells;Taeun Chang;Gabrielle Deveber

  • Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial

    Adam Kirton;Robert Chen;Sharon Friefeld;Carolyn Gunraj

  • Presumed perinatal ischemic stroke: vascular classification predicts outcomes.

    Adam Kirton;Gabrielle DeVeber;Ann‐Marie Pontigon;Daune Macgregor

  • Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke Study

    Michael J. Rivkin;Gabrielle deVeber;Rebecca N. Ichord;Adam Kirton

  • Quantified Corticospinal Tract Diffusion Restriction Predicts Neonatal Stroke Outcome

    Adam Kirton;Manohar Shroff;Tharshini Visvanathan;Gabrielle deVeber

  • Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (PedNIHSS) in a Multicenter Study

    Rebecca N. Ichord;Rachel Bastian;Lisa Abraham;Rand Askalan

  • Towards a Consensus-Based Classification of Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke

    Timothy J. Bernard;Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson;Warren Lo;Mark T. MacKay

  • Use of alteplase in childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: a multicentre, observational, cohort study.

    Catherine Amlie-Lefond;Gabrielle deVeber;Anthony K. Chan;Susan Benedict

  • Perinatal stroke: mechanisms, management, and outcomes of early cerebrovascular brain injury.

    Mary Dunbar;Adam Kirton

  • Arteriopathy diagnosis in childhood arterial ischemic stroke: results of the vascular effects of infection in pediatric stroke study.

    Max Wintermark;Nancy K. Hills;Gabrielle A. deVeber;A. James Barkovich

  • Acute Corticospinal Tract Wallerian Degeneration Is Associated With Stroke Outcome

    Giselle DeVetten;Shelagh B. Coutts;Michael D. Hill;Mayank Goyal

  • Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Associated With Neonatal Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

    Lauran Cole;Deborah Dewey;Nicole Letourneau;Bonnie J. Kaplan

  • Advances in Perinatal Ischemic Stroke

    Adam Kirton;Gabrielle deVeber

  • Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke Practice Guidelines, Update 2015:

    Gail A. Eskes;Krista L. Lanctôt;Krista L. Lanctôt;Nathan Herrmann;Nathan Herrmann;Patrice Lindsay;Patrice Lindsay

  • Clinical and imaging characteristics of arteriopathy subtypes in children with arterial ischemic stroke: Results of the vips study

    M. Wintermark;N.K. Hills;G.A. DeVeber;A.J. Barkovich

  • Brain stimulation and constraint for perinatal stroke hemiparesis: The PLASTIC CHAMPS Trial.

    Adam Kirton;John Andersen;Mia Herrero;Alberto Nettel-Aguirre

  • Emergence of the Primary Pediatric Stroke Center Impact of the Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke Trial

    Timothy J. Bernard;Michael J. Rivkin;Kelley Scholz;Gabrielle De Veber

  • NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION IN CHILDREN: APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

    Thilinie Rajapakse;Adam Kirton

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabrielle deVeber
Gabrielle deVeber University of Toronto
Sean P. Dukelow
Sean P. Dukelow University of Calgary
Brian L. Brooks
Brian L. Brooks Alberta Children's Hospital
Michael Shevell
Michael Shevell McGill University
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Anthony K.C. Chan
Anthony K.C. Chan McMaster University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University
Paul E. Croarkin
Paul E. Croarkin Mayo Clinic
Mitchell S.V. Elkind
Mitchell S.V. Elkind Columbia University
Robert Chen
Robert Chen University Health Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in neuroscience opens doors to various career pathways, both in research and applied sciences. For prospective students seeking value, it’s worth exploring interesting majors that pay well—these often include specialized STEM fields like neuroscience, biotechnology, and data analysis.

Flexible learning options are now available for students balancing work, family, or other commitments. A wide range of online school that accepts fafsa programs can make education more affordable and accessible, letting you earn your degree entirely online while potentially qualifying for federal aid.

If you’re looking to enhance your qualifications or switch fields, you might consider adding online certifications to your resume. These can offer focused skills in neuroscience-adjacent areas like clinical research or data analytics and often lead to well-paying roles.

Not sure which program fits you best? Compare online degree programs to find one that matches your interests, scheduling needs, and career goals. Whether aiming for research or industry, plenty of flexible pathways can help you succeed in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Kirton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles