World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sean P. Dukelow

Sean P. Dukelow

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7683
World Ranking
7160
National Ranking
421

Sean P. Dukelow publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean P. Dukelow sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sean P. Dukelow D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean P. Dukelow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sean P. Dukelow is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on rehabilitation and neurology.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Rehabilitation
  • Epidemiology
  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Work by Sean P. Dukelow focuses mainly on topics such as:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

They have published research in leading venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
  • Neurology
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury, 2021, Nature
  • Higher Doses Improve Walking Recovery During Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation, 2020, Stroke
  • Bringing proportional recovery into proportion: Bayesian modelling of post-stroke motor impairment, 2020, Brain
  • Investigating the neuroanatomy underlying proprioception using a stroke model, 2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study, 2021, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephen H. Scott
  • Michael D. Hill
  • Adam Kirton
  • Chantel T. Debert
  • Mark Bayley

Best Publications

  • Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015

    Debbie Hebert;M Patrice Lindsay;M Patrice Lindsay;Amanda McIntyre;Adam Kirton

  • Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial

    Gustavo Saposnik;Gustavo Saposnik;Leonardo G Cohen;Muhammad Mamdani;Sepideth Pooyania

  • Quantitative Assessment of Limb Position Sense Following Stroke

    Sean P. Dukelow;Troy M. Herter;Kimberly D. Moore;Mary Jo Demers

  • Distinguishing Subregions of the Human MT+ Complex Using Visual Fields and Pursuit Eye Movements

    Sean P. Dukelow;Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Jody C. Culham;Albert V. van den Berg

  • Assessment of Upper-Limb Sensorimotor Function of Subacute Stroke Patients Using Visually Guided Reaching

    Angela M. Coderre;Amr Abou Zeid;Sean P. Dukelow;Melanie J. Demmer

  • Functional Electrical Stimulation and Spinal Cord Injury

    Chester H. Ho;Ronald J. Triolo;Anastasia L. Elias;Kevin L. Kilgore

  • Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy

    Stephen H. Scott;Sean P. Dukelow

  • The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke

    Sean P Dukelow;Troy M Herter;Troy M Herter;Troy M Herter;Stephen D Bagg;Stephen H Scott

  • Eye position signal modulates a human parietal pointing region during memory-guided movements.

    Joseph F. X. DeSouza;Sean P. Dukelow;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon

  • Robotic Identification of Kinesthetic Deficits After Stroke

    Jennifer A. Semrau;Troy M. Herter;Stephen H. Scott;Sean P. Dukelow

  • Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury

    Jordan W. Squair;Matthieu Gautier;Lois Mahe;Jan Elaine Soriano

  • Recovery of fMRI Activation in Motion Area MT Following Storage of the Motion Aftereffect

    Jody C. Culham;Sean P. Dukelow;Tutis Vilis;Frank A. Hassard

  • Visual motion and the human brain: what has neuroimaging told us?

    Jody Culham;Sheng He;Sean Dukelow;Frans A.J Verstraten

  • A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke

    Kathrin Tyryshkin;Angela M Coderre;Janice I Glasgow;Troy M Herter

  • Examining Differences in Patterns of Sensory and Motor Recovery After Stroke With Robotics

    Jennifer A. Semrau;Troy M. Herter;Stephen H. Scott;Sean P. Dukelow

  • Systematic changes in position sense accompany normal aging across adulthood

    Troy M Herter;Stephen H Scott;Sean P Dukelow

  • A Novel Robotic Task for Assessing Impairments in Bimanual Coordination Post-Stroke

    Catherine R Lowrey;Carl Pt Jackson;Stephen D Bagg;Sean P Dukelow

  • Higher Doses Improve Walking Recovery During Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation

    Tara D. Klassen;Sean P. Dukelow;Mark T. Bayley;Oscar Benavente

  • Taking Proportional Out of Stroke Recovery.

    Rachel L. Hawe;Stephen H. Scott;Sean P. Dukelow

  • Robotic assessment of sensorimotor deficits after traumatic brain injury.

    Chantel T. Debert;Troy M. Herter;Stephen H. Scott;Sean Dukelow

  • The mechanisms and evidence of efficacy of electrical stimulation for healing of pressure ulcer: a systematic review.

    Lisa Kawasaki;Vivian K. Mushahwar;Chester Ho;Sean P. Dukelow

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Scott
Stephen Scott Queen's University
Adam Kirton
Adam Kirton University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Tutis Vilis
Tutis Vilis University of Western Ontario
Janice J. Eng
Janice J. Eng University of British Columbia
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Catherine Lebel
Catherine Lebel University of Calgary
Vivian K. Mushahwar
Vivian K. Mushahwar University of Alberta
Jody C. Culham
Jody C. Culham University of Western Ontario
Brian L. Brooks
Brian L. Brooks Alberta Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career related to neuroscience can open the door to a range of professional opportunities. Many students explore online degree programs that complement or expand on their neuroscience background. For those interested in exploring human behavior and mental processes, checking out the cheapest online psychology degree options can be a cost-effective way to advance your education.

Another popular pathway is in social work. Flexible masters in social work online programs enable students to quickly gain the skills needed for social work roles, including clinical and community-based positions.

For those aspiring to become licensed therapists or psychologists, pursuing graduate education is essential. Fast-tracked options like the shortest online psyd programs and accredited lmft programs (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) can provide practical training and licensure preparation within a flexible online format.

Exploring these online degrees can help neuroscience graduates diversify their career options, meet licensure requirements, and tailor their expertise to the field that most matches their interests.

Best Scientists Citing Sean P. Dukelow

Trending Scientists