World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
28265
World Ranking
2700
National Ranking
65

Friedhelm C. Hummel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friedhelm C. Hummel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 278 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Friedhelm C. Hummel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friedhelm C. Hummel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Friedhelm C. Hummel is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, focusing primarily on neurological function and recovery mechanisms.

The main fields of study for this scientist include Neuroscience and Medicine. Within these, key subfields of work encompass Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

Their research topics cover a range of areas, notably:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Motor Control and Adaptation

Recent publications by Friedhelm C. Hummel include the following:

  • "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" (2020) published in Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528]" (2020) published in Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function" (2020) published in Neuron
  • "Noninvasive theta-burst stimulation of the human striatum enhances striatal activity and motor skill learning" (2023) published in Nature Neuroscience
  • "The structural connectome and motor recovery after stroke: predicting natural recovery" (2021) published in Brain

Friedhelm C. Hummel has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Maximilian J. Wessel
  • Takuya Morishita
  • Elena Beanato
  • Traian Popa
  • Estelle Raffin

Their publications have appeared in a variety of scientific venues, with a notable concentration in:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008

    Michael A. Nitsche;Leonardo G. Cohen;Eric M. Wassermann;Alberto Priori

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Nathalie André-Obadia;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation.

    Prateek C. Gandiga;Friedhelm C. Hummel;Leonardo G. Cohen

  • Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke

    Friedhelm Hummel;Pablo Celnik;Pascal Giraux;Agnes Floel

  • Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines

    A. Antal;Ivan Alekseichuk;M. Bikson;J. Brockmöller

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?

    Friedhelm C Hummel;Leonardo G Cohen

  • Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity.

    Paul Sauseng;Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Kirstin F. Heise;Walter R. Gruber

  • Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing.

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Markus Härle;Friedhelm Hummel

  • Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke

    Esteban A. Fridman;Takashi Hanakawa;Melissa Chung;Friedhelm Hummel

  • Dissociation of sustained attention from central executive functions: local activity and interregional connectivity in the theta range

    P. Sauseng;J. Hoppe;W. Klimesch;C. Gerloff

  • Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke

    Julie Duque;Friedhelm Hummel;Pablo Celnik;Nagako Murase;Nagako Murase

  • Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex.

    P. Sauseng;W. Klimesch;C. Gerloff;F.C. Hummel

  • Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper

    Ethan R. Buch;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Andrea Antal;Jan Born

  • Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke.

    Friedhelm Hummel;Leonardo G. Cohen

  • Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain

    Friedhelm C. Hummel;Frank Andres;Eckart Altenmüller;Johannes Dichgans

  • Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke

    Pablo Celnik;Friedhelm Hummel;Friedhelm Hummel;Michelle Harris-Love;Rebecca Wolk

  • Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke

    Friedhelm C Hummel;Friedhelm C Hummel;Bernhard Voller;Pablo Celnik;Agnes Floel

  • Intermanual Differences in Movement-related Interhemispheric Inhibition

    Julie Duque;Nagako Murase;Pablo Celnik;Friedhelm Hummel

  • Larger Interregional Synchrony is Associated with Greater Behavioral Success in a Complex Sensory Integration Task in Humans

    Friedhelm Hummel;Christian Gerloff

  • Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation?

    Janine Reis;Edwin M. Robertson;John W. Krakauer;John Rothwell

  • Report Brain Oscillatory Substrates of Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity

    Paul Sauseng;Wolfgang Klimesch;Kirstin F. Heise;Walter R. Gruber

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Gerloff
Christian Gerloff University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Leonardo G. Cohen
Leonardo G. Cohen National Institutes of Health
Götz Thomalla
Götz Thomalla Universität Hamburg
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Alexander Münchau
Alexander Münchau University of Lübeck
Agnes Flöel
Agnes Flöel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Paul Sauseng
Paul Sauseng Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl Hannover Medical School
Wolfgang Klimesch
Wolfgang Klimesch University of Salzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Friedhelm C. Hummel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles