World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
132
Citations
69815
World Ranking
264
National Ranking
18

Ulf Ziemann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Ziemann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 690 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulf Ziemann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Ziemann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulf Ziemann is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans a considerable number of publications, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and neurology, along with epidemiology and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research primarily covers topics such as:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Ziemann has published frequently in several scientific journals, with high numbers in these venues:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Brain stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Neurological Research and Practice

Significant recent papers include:

  • "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" (2020, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • "Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines" (2020, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • "Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper" (2022, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • "Safety and efficacy of zilucoplan in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study" (2023, The Lancet Neurology)
  • "Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement" (2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ziemann include:

  • Christoph Zrenner
  • Paolo Belardinelli
  • Annerose Mengel
  • Sven Poli
  • Pedro Caldana Gordon

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application: An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee

    P.M. Rossini;D. Burke;R. Chen;L.G. Cohen

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Nathalie André-Obadia;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee

    S. Groppa;A. Oliviero;A. Eisen;A. Quartarone

  • Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

    U. Ziemann;S. Lönnecker;B. J. Steinhoff;W. Paulus

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    Simone Rossi;Andrea Antal;Sven Bestmann;Marom Bikson

  • Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex.

    U Ziemann;J C Rothwell;M C Ridding

  • Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines

    A. Antal;Ivan Alekseichuk;M. Bikson;J. Brockmöller

  • Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex

    Wolf Muellbacher;Ulf Ziemann;Ulf Ziemann;Joerg Wissel;Nguyet Dang

  • Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation

    Giovanni Di Pino;Giovanni Pellegrino;Giovanni Assenza;Fioravante Capone

  • Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects.

    M. C. Ridding;U. Ziemann

  • The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man

    Ulf Ziemann;Silke Lönnecker;Bernhard J. Steinhoff;Walter Paulus

  • Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients

    Sven Jarius;Klemens Ruprecht;Brigitte Wildemann;Tania Kuempfel

  • TMS and drugs

    Ulf Ziemann

  • The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

    Robert Chen;Didier Cros;Antonio Curra;Vincenzo Di Lazzaro

  • Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex.

    Ulf Ziemann;Tihomir V. Iliać;Christian Pauli;Frank Meintzschel

  • Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols

    Ulf Ziemann;Walter Paulus;Michael A. Nitsche;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • TMS and drugs revisited 2014

    Ulf Ziemann;Janine Reis;Peter Schwenkreis;Mario Rosanova

  • Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

    Tihomir V. Ilić;Frank Meintzschel;Ulrich Cleff;Diane Ruge

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Belardinelli
Paolo Belardinelli University of Trento
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen
Leonardo G. Cohen
Leonardo G. Cohen National Institutes of Health
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Robert Chen
Robert Chen University Health Network
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health
Hayrettin Tumani
Hayrettin Tumani University of Ulm
John C. Rothwell
John C. Rothwell University College London
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up many avenues for students interested in Neuroscience. Today, there are a growing number of online psych d programs for those looking to enter clinical psychology and related fields, which often overlap with neuropsychological studies and patient care.

Accelerated options can help you fast-track your education. For example, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs offer a quicker route into therapy careers that require an understanding of both psychology and neuroscience principles. Additionally, there are numerous accelerated programs online in a variety of health and science disciplines, allowing students to earn a degree more quickly and begin their career sooner.

Choosing the right bachelor's degree can have a significant impact on your future earning potential. It’s important to consider what bachelors degree should i get if you want to combine your interest in Neuroscience with strong job prospects and salary outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf Ziemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles