World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
102
Citations
47900
World Ranking
489
National Ranking
12

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
51137
World Ranking
7228
National Ranking
212

Michael Fenech publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fenech sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 328 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Michael Fenech D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fenech sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Michael Fenech is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research spans various domains within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine.

The main fields of study in their research include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields of their work cover:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Rheumatology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Hematology

Fenech's research focuses on key topics such as:

  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders

They have contributed to research published in the following venues:

  • Life
  • Annual Review of Nutrition

Two notable recent papers include:

  • "Evaluation of GammaH2AX in Buccal Cells as a Molecular Biomarker of DNA Damage in Alzheimer's Disease in the AIBL Study of Ageing" (2020), published in Life
  • "Multiomics: Functional Molecular Biomarkers of Micronutrients for Public Health Application" (2024), published in Annual Review of Nutrition

Fenech frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including:

  • Mohd Faizan Siddiqui
  • Maxime François
  • Stephanie R. Rainey-Smith
  • Ralph N. Martins
  • Colin L. Masters

Best Publications

  • The in vitro micronucleus technique.

    Michael Fenech

  • Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

    Michael Fenech;Alexander A. Morley

  • Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay

    Michael Fenech

  • HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures.

    Michael Fenech;W. P. Chang;M. Kirsch-Volders;N. Holland

  • Health benefits of herbs and spices: the past, the present, the future

    Linda C Tapsell;Ian Hemphill;Lynne Cobiac;Craig S Patch

  • Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells

    M. Fenech;M. Kirsch-Volders;A. T. Natarajan;J. Surralles

  • The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: A detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations

    Michael Fenech

  • An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans.

    Stefano Bonassi;Ariana Znaor;Marcello Ceppi;Cecilia Lando

  • Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron Review.

    Sean Lynch;Christine M Pfeiffer;Michael K Georgieff;Gary Brittenham

  • Low-grade inflammation, diet composition and health: current research evidence and its translation

    Anne-Marie Minihane;Sophie Vinoy;Wendy R. Russell;Athanasia Baka

  • The HUman MicroNucleus Project--An international collaborative study on the use of the micronucleus technique for measuring DNA damage in humans.

    Michael Fenech;Nina Holland;Wushou P Chang;Errol Zeiger

  • The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: The HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps

    Nina Holland;Claudia Bolognesi;Micheline Kirsch-Volders;Stefano Bonassi

  • Buccal micronucleus cytome assay

    Philip Thomas;Nina Holland;Claudia Bolognesi;Micheline Kirsch-Volders

  • Report from the in vitro micronucleus assay working group

    Micheline Kirsch-Volders;Toshio Sofuni;Marilyn Aardema;Silvio Albertini

  • Cytokinesis-block micronucleus method in human lymphocytes: effect of in vivo ageing and low dose X-irradiation.

    Michael Fenech;Alexander A. Morley

  • The role of folic acid and Vitamin B12 in genomic stability of human cells.

    Michael Fenech

  • Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a "cytome" assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death.

    Michael Fenech

  • HUman MicroNucleus Project: International database comparison for results with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes: I. Effect of laboratory protocol, scoring criteria, and host factors on the frequency of micronuclei

    Stefano Bonassi;Michael Fenech;Cecilia Lando;Yi‐ping Lin

  • Micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes and cancer risk: evidence from human studies

    Stefano Bonassi;Randa El-Zein;Claudia Bolognesi;Michael Fenech

  • A quantitative PCR method for measuring absolute telomere length

    Nathan J O'Callaghan;Michael Fenech

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Thomas
Philip J. Thomas The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Stefano Bonassi
Stefano Bonassi San Raffaele University of Rome
Micheline Kirsch-Volders
Micheline Kirsch-Volders Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Claudia Bolognesi
Claudia Bolognesi National Cancer Research Institute, UK
Errol Zeiger
Errol Zeiger National Institutes of Health
Peter M. Clifton
Peter M. Clifton University of South Australia
Lynnette R. Ferguson
Lynnette R. Ferguson University of Auckland
Manny Noakes
Manny Noakes Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Bruce K. Armstrong
Bruce K. Armstrong University of Sydney
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Molecular Biology can open many doors in both science and technology fields. However, related online programs offer additional options for those interested in blending biology expertise with other disciplines or switching career lanes.

For example, those inspired by communication sciences may be curious about the education required to be a speech pathologist. This path combines scientific knowledge with human-centered skills and often requires advanced graduate study.

If creativity and design interest you, the best 2 year graphic design degree online programs can help you launch a career in digital imaging or multimedia, both of which are in demand in today’s digital landscape.

For those passionate about technical problem-solving, consider earning a math degree online. Mathematics is the backbone of data science, genomics, and computational biology.

Alternatively, a degree in the design and building sector, such as an architecture degree online, can merge creativity with scientific principles.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you shape a specialized or interdisciplinary career pathway that aligns with your unique interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Fenech

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles