World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
João Paulo Teixeira

João Paulo Teixeira

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Portugal
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
79
Citations
20535
World Ranking
1023
National Ranking
6

João Paulo Teixeira publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Paulo Teixeira sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 465 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

João Paulo Teixeira D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where João Paulo Teixeira sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

João Paulo Teixeira is affiliated with the University of Porto in Portugal. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Medicine, with notable contributions in subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Materials Chemistry, Cancer Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pollution.

Their scientific work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Occupational Health and Performance
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Noise Effects and Management

João Paulo Teixeira has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results, 2020, Nature Protocols
  • Measuring DNA modifications with the comet assay: a compendium of protocols, 2023, Nature Protocols
  • Mortality risk attributable to wildfire-related PM2·5 pollution: a global time series study in 749 locations, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Short term associations of ambient nitrogen dioxide with daily total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality: multilocation analysis in 398 cities, 2021, BMJ
  • Association of inflammatory mediators with frailty status in older adults: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, GeroScience

Frequent co-authors in their scientific collaborations include Carla Costa, Solange Costa, Vanessa Valdiglesias, Blanca Laffón, and Joana Madureira.

The most frequent publication venues for João Paulo Teixeira are:

  • Toxicology Letters
  • Nanomaterials
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Research
  • Mutagenesis

In addition to journal publications, João Paulo Teixeira has contributed to the book titled Educação, Meio Ambiente e Saúde, to be published by Diálogo Comunicação e Marketing eBooks in 2025.

Best Publications

  • The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    S. Chatrchyan;G. Hmayakyan;V. Khachatryan;A. M. Sirunyan

  • Ambient Particulate Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in 652 Cities

    Cong Liu;Renjie Chen;Francesco Sera;Ana M. Vicedo-Cabrera

  • CMS physics technical design report, volume II: Physics performance

    G. L. Bayatian;S. Chatrchyan;G. Hmayakyan;A. M. Sirunyan

  • Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities

    A. AghaKouchak;A. Farahmand;F. S. Melton;J. Teixeira

  • Music and emotions in the brain: familiarity matters

    Carlos Silva Pereira;João Teixeira;Patrícia Figueiredo;João Xavier

  • A Combined Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux Approach for the Convective Boundary Layer

    A. Pier Siebesma;Pedro M. M. Soares;João Teixeira

  • Vocal Acoustic Analysis – Jitter, Shimmer and HNR Parameters☆

    João Paulo Teixeira;Carla Oliveira;Carla Lopes

  • Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite observations

    Jonathan H. Jiang;Hui Su;Chengxing Zhai;Vincent S. Perun

  • Nanomaterials Versus Ambient Ultrafine Particles: An Opportunity to Exchange Toxicology Knowledge

    Vicki Stone;Mark R Miller;Martin J D Clift;Alison Elder

  • The representation of soil moisture freezing and its impact on the stable boundary layer

    Pedro Viterbo;Anton Beljaars;Jean‐François Mahfouf;João Teixeira

  • Entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection: an overview

    Wim C. de Rooy;Peter Bechtold;Kristina Fröhlich;Cathy Hohenegger

  • Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High‐Resolution Simulations

    Tapio Schneider;Shiwei Lan;Andrew Stuart;João Teixeira

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results

    Peter Møller;Amaya Azqueta;Elisa Boutet-Robinet;Gudrun Koppen

  • Mortality risk attributable to wildfire-related PM2·5 pollution: a global time series study in 749 locations.

    Gongbo Chen;Yuming Guo;Xu Yue;Shilu Tong

  • CMS physics technical design report: Addendum on high density QCD with heavy ions

    D. d'Enterria;D. d'Enterria;M. Ballintijn;M. Bedjidian;D. Hofman

  • Climate goals and computing the future of clouds

    Tapio Schneider;João Teixeira;Christopher S. Bretherton;Florent Brient

  • A Planetary Boundary Layer Height Climatology Derived from ECMWF Reanalysis Data

    Axel von Engeln;João Teixeira

  • An eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parametrization for dry and shallow cumulus convection

    P. M. M. Soares;P. M. A. Miranda;A. P. Siebesma;J. Teixeira

  • Indoor air quality in schools and its relationship with children's respiratory symptoms

    Joana Madureira;Inês Paciência;João Rufo;Elisabete Ramos

  • CMS Physics : Technical Design Report Volume 1: Detector Performance and Software

    G L Bayatian;A Korablev;A Soha;O Sharif

  • Short term associations of ambient nitrogen dioxide with daily total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality: multilocation analysis in 398 cities

    Xia Meng;Cong Liu;Renjie Chen;Francesco Sera;Francesco Sera

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Bonassi
Stefano Bonassi San Raffaele University of Rome
Brian H. Kahn
Brian H. Kahn California Institute of Technology
Eric J. Fetzer
Eric J. Fetzer California Institute of Technology
Simone Morais
Simone Morais Polytechnic Institute of Porto
Tapio Schneider
Tapio Schneider California Institute of Technology
Cristina Delerue-Matos
Cristina Delerue-Matos Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto
Flemming R. Cassee
Flemming R. Cassee Utrecht University
Susana Garrido Azevedo
Susana Garrido Azevedo University of Coimbra
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education beyond a bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible options tailored to your career goals. Many professionals seek specialized programs like online ed d programs without dissertation to deepen their expertise while balancing work commitments. These programs provide an efficient pathway without the lengthy dissertation process.

Additionally, educators and administrators might find value in an eds to edd bridge program, which facilitates transitioning from a master's to a doctoral level, enhancing leadership skills in environmental education or policy.

For those inclined toward social work within environmental contexts, affordable options like dsw programs offer specialized training to address community and societal challenges linked to environmental issues.

Lastly, for students seeking a broad foundation or career flexibility, exploring a cheap online general studies degree can provide interdisciplinary knowledge applicable to various environmental careers without a significant financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing João Paulo Teixeira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles