What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Psychiatry
- Major depressive disorder
Psychiatry, Depression, Stroke, Internal medicine and Apathy are his primary areas of study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Alzheimer's disease, Dementia and Clinical psychology.
His Depression study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Lesion, Longitudinal study, Traumatic brain injury and Mood.
His Stroke research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Surgery and Pathology.
His study on Apathy is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Activities of daily living.
Sergio E. Starkstein studied Cognition and Parkinson's disease that intersect with Degenerative disease, RELIABILITY VALIDITY and Verbal memory.
His most cited work include:
- Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease. (782 citations)
- Depression Rating Scales in Parkinson’s Disease: Critique and Recommendations (487 citations)
- Depression in Parkinson's disease. (474 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Psychiatry, Depression, Dementia, Disease and Apathy.
His studies in Psychiatry integrate themes in fields like Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and Clinical psychology.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Clinical psychology, Rating scale are connected with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and other disciplines.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Lesion, Mood, Stroke, Internal medicine and Traumatic brain injury.
The various areas that he examines in his Disease study include Activities of daily living and Quality of life.
His Apathy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Psychosis, Irritability, Psychiatric assessment and Neuropsychiatry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Psychiatry (57.14%)
- Depression (45.64%)
- Dementia (26.48%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?
- Psychiatry (57.14%)
- Depression (45.64%)
- Anxiety (23.34%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Psychiatry, Depression, Anxiety, Clinical psychology and Type 2 diabetes.
Sergio E. Starkstein has researched Psychiatry in several fields, including Disease and Meaning.
His work carried out in the field of Depression brings together such families of science as Stroke, Physical therapy and Parkinson's disease.
His study in Anxiety is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Psychotherapist, Medicalization and Mood.
His Clinical psychology research focuses on Construct validity and how it connects with Rasch model.
His studies deal with areas such as Clinical Dementia Rating, Dementia and Internal medicine as well as Diabetes mellitus.
Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS): Development and validation of a new anxiety scale (90 citations)
- Anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease: Diagnosis, frequency, mechanism and clinical correlates (80 citations)
- High rates of parkinsonism in adults with autism. (41 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Psychiatry
- Major depressive disorder
Sergio E. Starkstein mainly focuses on Psychiatry, Diabetes mellitus, Depression, Type 2 diabetes and Anxiety.
His Psychiatry research incorporates elements of Internal medicine, Movement disorders and Parkinsonism.
His Diabetes mellitus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Clinical Dementia Rating, Dementia and Pediatrics.
Sergio E. Starkstein interconnects Cognition, Neuroimaging, Neuroscience and Clinical correlation in the investigation of issues within Dementia.
Depression is closely attributed to Randomized controlled trial in his study.
His Anxiety study incorporates themes from Psychotherapist, Quality of life, Disease and Clinical psychology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
