World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
18923
World Ranking
2208
National Ranking
1049

Laura Marsh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Marsh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 212 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Laura Marsh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Marsh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura Marsh is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, producing 73 publications. Their work spans multiple subfields including Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research covers key topics such as COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, and Memory Processes and Influences.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Laura Marsh include:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Co-infections, secondary infections, and antimicrobial use in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave from the ISARIC WHO CCP-UK study: a multicentre, prospective cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Microbe
  • Inflammatory profiles across the spectrum of disease reveal a distinct role for GM-CSF in severe COVID-19, 2021, Science Immunology
  • Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with underlying respiratory conditions admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a national, multicentre prospective cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK, 2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter Openshaw
  • J. Kenneth Baillie
  • Malcolm G. Semple
  • Lance Turtle
  • Annemarie B Docherty

Laura Marsh has published repeatedly in well-known scientific venues with multiple contributions to Scientific Reports and UNC Libraries. Other frequent publication sites are The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, and the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • S-Nitrosylation of Parkin Regulates Ubiquitination and Compromises Parkin's Protective Function

    Kenny K. K. Chung;Bobby Thomas;Xiaojie Li;Olga Pletnikova

  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease

    Dag Aarsland;Laura Marsh;Anette Schrag

  • Diagnostic criteria for psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS, NIMH work group

    Bernard Ravina;Karen Marder;Hubert H. Fernandez;Joseph H. Friedman

  • Aggregation promoting C-terminal truncation of α-synuclein is a normal cellular process and is enhanced by the familial Parkinson's disease-linked mutations

    Wenxue Li;Neva West;Emanuela Colla;Olga Pletnikova

  • Treatment of early Parkinson's disease.

    Laura Marsh;Ted M Dawson

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a review.

    Joseph H. Friedman;Richard G. Brown;Cynthia Comella;Carol E. Garber

  • Anterior hippocampal volume deficits in nonamnesic, aging chronic alcoholics.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Laura Marsh;Laura Marsh;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Depression and Parkinson’s Disease: Current Knowledge

    Laura Marsh

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson disease

    I. H. Richard;M. P. McDermott;R. Kurlan;J. M. Lyness

  • Apathy and anhedonia rating scales in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations

    Albert F G Leentjens;Kathy Dujardin;Laura Marsh;Pablo Martinez-Martin

  • The impact of depressive symptoms in early Parkinson disease.

    B. Ravina;R. Camicioli;P. G. Como;L. Marsh

  • Age-related decline in MRI volumes of temporal lobe gray matter but not hippocampus

    Edith V. Sullivan;Laura Marsh;Laura Marsh;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Provisional diagnostic criteria for depression in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS/NIMH Work Group

    Laura Marsh;William M. McDonald;Jeffrey Cummings;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina

  • Fatigue Rating Scales Critique and Recommendations by the Movement Disorders Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson's Disease

    Joseph H. Friedman;Joseph H. Friedman;Guido Alves;Peter Hagell;Johan Marinus

  • Cognitive performance of GBA mutation carriers with early-onset PD The CORE-PD study

    R. N. Alcalay;E. Caccappolo;H. Mejia-Santana;M. X. Tang

  • Clinical features associated with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease

    Gregory Pontone;James R. Williams;Susan Spear Bassett;Laura Marsh

  • Randomized placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

    Iracema Leroi;Jason Brandt;Stephen G. Reich;Constantine G. Lyketsos

  • Volumetric MRI assessment of temporal lobe structures in schizophrenia.

    Robert B. Zipursky;Laura Marsh;Kelvin O. Lim;Stacie DeMent

  • Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson's disease: A validation study of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale

    Albert F.G. Leentjens;Kathy Dujardin;Laura Marsh;Irene H. Richard

  • Structural brain imaging in schizophrenia: a selective review

    Godfrey D Pearlson;Laura Marsh

  • A recommended scale for cognitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease

    Kelvin L. Chou;Melissa M. Amick;Jason Brandt;Richard Camicioli

  • Aβ deposition is associated with enhanced cortical α-synuclein lesions in Lewy body diseases

    Olga Pletnikova;Neva West;Michael K. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph H. Friedman
Joseph H. Friedman Brown University
Jimmy R. Williams
Jimmy R. Williams Biogen (United States)
Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Ruth Ottman
Ruth Ottman Columbia University
William K. Scott
William K. Scott University of Miami
Steven J. Frucht
Steven J. Frucht New York University
Susan B. Bressman
Susan B. Bressman Mount Sinai Beth Israel
Caroline M. Tanner
Caroline M. Tanner University of California, San Francisco
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Danna Jennings
Danna Jennings Denali Therapeutics (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, a range of related online degrees can broaden your career options and complement your academic journey. Many students consider pursuing a bachelors in psychology online as a foundation for understanding human behavior and cognition. This pathway provides essential knowledge beneficial for further studies in neuroscience or related health sciences.

For advanced study, an online masters in psychology can enhance your expertise, opening doors to research, clinical roles, and specialized counseling positions. Another popular choice for those with an interest in mental health and therapy is enrolling in online mft programs accredited to become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Social work is another field closely linked to neuroscience and psychology. If you’re looking to work in community support or mental health services, consider the masters in social work online programs for flexible and accessible learning. These programs equip graduates to support individuals and families through life’s challenges, often in clinical or healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Marsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles