World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 73 2208 2017 1049 939 212 18923

Laura Marsh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura Marsh between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura Marsh published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 11 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura Marsh: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 5
1997 6
1998 2
1999 4
2000 12
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 4
2005 7
2006 7
2007 3
2008 6
2009 11
2010 12
2011 14
2012 16
2013 13
2014 10
2015 10
2016 10
2017 10
2018 5
2019 5
2020 11
2021 15
2022 7
2023 11
2024 8
2025 3
Total 250
Download as CSV

Laura Marsh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Marsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 212 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 212
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura Marsh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Marsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200 73
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura Marsh is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, producing 73 publications. Their work spans multiple subfields including Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research covers key topics such as COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, and Memory Processes and Influences.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Laura Marsh include:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Co-infections, secondary infections, and antimicrobial use in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave from the ISARIC WHO CCP-UK study: a multicentre, prospective cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Microbe
  • Inflammatory profiles across the spectrum of disease reveal a distinct role for GM-CSF in severe COVID-19, 2021, Science Immunology
  • Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with underlying respiratory conditions admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a national, multicentre prospective cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK, 2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter Openshaw
  • J. Kenneth Baillie
  • Malcolm G. Semple
  • Lance Turtle
  • Annemarie B Docherty

Laura Marsh has published repeatedly in well-known scientific venues with multiple contributions to Scientific Reports and UNC Libraries. Other frequent publication sites are The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, and the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • S-Nitrosylation of Parkin Regulates Ubiquitination and Compromises Parkin's Protective Function

    Kenny K. K. Chung;Bobby Thomas;Xiaojie Li;Olga Pletnikova

  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease

    Dag Aarsland;Laura Marsh;Anette Schrag

  • Diagnostic criteria for psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS, NIMH work group

    Bernard Ravina;Karen Marder;Hubert H. Fernandez;Joseph H. Friedman

  • Aggregation promoting C-terminal truncation of α-synuclein is a normal cellular process and is enhanced by the familial Parkinson's disease-linked mutations

    Wenxue Li;Neva West;Emanuela Colla;Olga Pletnikova

  • Treatment of early Parkinson's disease.

    Laura Marsh;Ted M Dawson

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a review.

    Joseph H. Friedman;Richard G. Brown;Cynthia Comella;Carol E. Garber

  • Anterior hippocampal volume deficits in nonamnesic, aging chronic alcoholics.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Laura Marsh;Laura Marsh;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Depression and Parkinson’s Disease: Current Knowledge

    Laura Marsh

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson disease

    I. H. Richard;M. P. McDermott;R. Kurlan;J. M. Lyness

  • Apathy and anhedonia rating scales in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations

    Albert F G Leentjens;Kathy Dujardin;Laura Marsh;Pablo Martinez-Martin

  • The impact of depressive symptoms in early Parkinson disease.

    B. Ravina;R. Camicioli;P. G. Como;L. Marsh

  • Age-related decline in MRI volumes of temporal lobe gray matter but not hippocampus

    Edith V. Sullivan;Laura Marsh;Laura Marsh;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Provisional diagnostic criteria for depression in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS/NIMH Work Group

    Laura Marsh;William M. McDonald;Jeffrey Cummings;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina

  • Fatigue Rating Scales Critique and Recommendations by the Movement Disorders Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson's Disease

    Joseph H. Friedman;Joseph H. Friedman;Guido Alves;Peter Hagell;Johan Marinus

  • Cognitive performance of GBA mutation carriers with early-onset PD The CORE-PD study

    R. N. Alcalay;E. Caccappolo;H. Mejia-Santana;M. X. Tang

  • Clinical features associated with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease

    Gregory Pontone;James R. Williams;Susan Spear Bassett;Laura Marsh

  • Randomized placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

    Iracema Leroi;Jason Brandt;Stephen G. Reich;Constantine G. Lyketsos

  • Volumetric MRI assessment of temporal lobe structures in schizophrenia.

    Robert B. Zipursky;Laura Marsh;Kelvin O. Lim;Stacie DeMent

  • Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson's disease: A validation study of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale

    Albert F.G. Leentjens;Kathy Dujardin;Laura Marsh;Irene H. Richard

  • Structural brain imaging in schizophrenia: a selective review

    Godfrey D Pearlson;Laura Marsh

  • A recommended scale for cognitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease

    Kelvin L. Chou;Melissa M. Amick;Jason Brandt;Richard Camicioli

  • Aβ deposition is associated with enhanced cortical α-synuclein lesions in Lewy body diseases

    Olga Pletnikova;Neva West;Michael K. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph H. Friedman
Joseph H. Friedman Brown University
Jimmy R. Williams
Jimmy R. Williams Biogen (United States)
Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Ruth Ottman
Ruth Ottman Columbia University
William K. Scott
William K. Scott University of Miami
Steven J. Frucht
Steven J. Frucht New York University
Susan B. Bressman
Susan B. Bressman Mount Sinai Beth Israel
Caroline M. Tanner
Caroline M. Tanner University of California, San Francisco
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Danna Jennings
Danna Jennings Denali Therapeutics (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, a range of related online degrees can broaden your career options and complement your academic journey. Many students consider pursuing a bachelors in psychology online as a foundation for understanding human behavior and cognition. This pathway provides essential knowledge beneficial for further studies in neuroscience or related health sciences.

For advanced study, an online masters in psychology can enhance your expertise, opening doors to research, clinical roles, and specialized counseling positions. Another popular choice for those with an interest in mental health and therapy is enrolling in online mft programs accredited to become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Social work is another field closely linked to neuroscience and psychology. If you’re looking to work in community support or mental health services, consider the masters in social work online programs for flexible and accessible learning. These programs equip graduates to support individuals and families through life’s challenges, often in clinical or healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Marsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles