World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 119 594 565 359 338 503 48333
Psychology 119 269 232 170 144 456 48170
Neuroscience 120 385 344 229 202 502 49060
Medicine 120 3780 3540 2075 1919 500 49065

Edith V. Sullivan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edith V. Sullivan between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edith V. Sullivan published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2010. 17 of the 526 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2010. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

526 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edith V. Sullivan: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 4
1990 2
1991 8
1992 4
1993 8
1994 9
1995 12
1996 15
1997 16
1998 17
1999 11
2000 19
2001 16
2002 18
2003 16
2004 14
2005 17
2006 14
2007 12
2008 9
2009 21
2010 27
2011 16
2012 15
2013 13
2014 17
2015 15
2016 16
2017 13
2018 11
2019 22
2020 22
2021 21
2022 15
2023 15
2024 13
2025 4
Total 526
Download as CSV

Edith V. Sullivan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith V. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 451–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 456 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27 456
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Edith V. Sullivan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith V. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22 119
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Edith V. Sullivan is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research spans a broad range of topics with a focus on functional brain connectivity, neuroimaging techniques, and substance exposure effects. The scientist's work is situated at the intersection of cognitive neuroscience and clinical applications, with significant output in advanced imaging methodologies and neurological disorder studies.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Key subfields encompass:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Neurology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Research interests focus on the following topics:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Sullivan has published several papers in notable venues. Recent publications include:

  • Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolution for Resting-State fMRI Analysis, 2020, Lecture notes in computer science
  • Quantifying Parkinson's disease motor severity under uncertainty using MDS-UPDRS videos, 2021, Medical Image Analysis
  • Emotional processes in binge drinking: A systematic review and perspective, 2021, Clinical Psychology Review
  • Vision-Based Estimation of MDS-UPDRS Gait Scores for Assessing Parkinson's Disease Motor Severity, 2020, Lecture notes in computer science
  • Association of Heavy Drinking With Deviant Fiber Tract Development in Frontal Brain Systems in Adolescents, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Adolf Pfefferbaum
  • Kilian M. Pohl
  • Natalie M. Zahr
  • Qingyu Zhao
  • Ehsan Adeli

The scientist's work appears regularly in publication venues such as:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Addiction Biology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Alcohol

Best Publications

  • A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Daniel H. Mathalon;Edith V. Sullivan;Jody M. Rawles

  • Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications

    Steven C. Cramer;Mriganka Sur;Bruce H. Dobkin;Charles J O'Brien

  • COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN EARLY, UNTREATED PARKINSON'S DISEASE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO MOTOR DISABILITY

    James A. Cooper;Harvey J. Sagar;Nigel Jordan;Norman S. Harvey

  • Age-related decline in brain white matter anisotropy measured with spatially corrected echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Maj Hedehus;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Diffusion tensor imaging and aging.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Brain Gray and White Matter Volume Loss Accelerates with Aging in Chronic Alcoholics: A Quantitative MRI Study

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Robert B. Zipursky;Robert B. Zipursky;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon

  • Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex

    N. Sobel;V. Prabhakaran;J. E. Desmond;G. H. Glover

  • Frontal Lobe Volume Loss Observed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Older Chronic Alcoholics

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Edith V. Sullivan;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Compromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Maj Hedehus;Michael Moseley;Alexander de Crespigny

  • MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

    Berkin Bilgic;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Torsten Rohlfing;Edith V. Sullivan

  • Neurocircuitry in alcoholism: a substrate of disruption and repair

    Edith V. Sullivan;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Widespread cerebral gray matter volume deficits in schizophrenia.

    Robert B. Zipursky;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Edith V. Sullivan;Edith V. Sullivan;Byron W. Brown

  • Pattern of Motor and Cognitive Deficits in Detoxified Alcoholic Men

    E. V. Sullivan;Margaret J. Rosenbloom;A. Pfefferbaum

  • Progressive Brain Volume Changes and the Clinical Course of Schizophrenia in Men: A Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Daniel H. Mathalon;Edith V. Sullivan;Kelvin O. Lim;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Longitudinal Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Volumes in Abstinent and Relapsed Alcoholics

    A. Pfefferbaum;E. V. Sullivan;E. V. Sullivan;D. H. Mathalon;P. K. Shear

  • The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure.

    Torsten Rohlfing;Natalie M. Zahr;Natalie M. Zahr;Edith V. Sullivan;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • A Controlled Study of Cortical Gray Matter and Ventricular Changes in Alcoholic Men Over a 5-Year Interval

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Margaret J. Rosenbloom;Daniel H. Mathalon

  • Equivalent disruption of regional white matter microstructure in ageing healthy men and women.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Elfar Adalsteinsson;Maj Hedehus;Catherine Ju

  • Frontal circuitry degradation marks healthy adult aging: Evidence from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Elfar Adalsteinsson;Edith V. Sullivan

  • Quantitative fiber tracking of lateral and interhemispheric white matter systems in normal aging: relations to timed performance.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Torsten Rohlfing;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Progressive Brain Volume Changes and the Clinical Course of Schizophrenia in Men

    Daniel H. Mathalon;Edith V. Sullivan;Kelvin O. Lim;Adolf Pfefferbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Kelvin O. Lim
Kelvin O. Lim University of Minnesota
Eva M. Müller-Oehring
Eva M. Müller-Oehring Stanford University
Daniel H. Mathalon
Daniel H. Mathalon University of California, San Francisco
Fiona C. Baker
Fiona C. Baker SRI International
Paula K. Shear
Paula K. Shear University of Cincinnati
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
John E. Desmond
John E. Desmond Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ehsan Adeli
Ehsan Adeli Stanford University
Duncan B. Clark
Duncan B. Clark University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can offer flexibility and affordability for students seeking advanced education without putting their careers on hold. Many U.S. states now offer diverse options for remote learning, allowing you to select the best program that meets your academic and financial needs.

Students in the western U.S. may want to explore affordable online psychology master's programs in California, which combine reputable faculty and lower tuition costs. Those located in the southeast can benefit from the most affordable online master's psychology degree programs in Florida, offering strong curriculum options at competitive prices.

If you plan to study in the northeast, review the cheapest online psychology master's programs in New York for access to robust educational resources and networking. Prospective students in the southern or central regions should consider the affordable online psychology master's programs in Texas, known for their value and accredited offerings.

With a psychology degree, numerous career pathways become available, from counseling to research or human resources. Choosing an affordable, accredited online program can maximize your investment and support your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Edith V. Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles