World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Liisa Lähteenmäki

Liisa Lähteenmäki

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1447 1291 11 10 201 16346

Liisa Lähteenmäki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liisa Lähteenmäki between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liisa Lähteenmäki published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 12 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liisa Lähteenmäki: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 5
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 5
2001 9
2002 7
2003 11
2004 9
2005 5
2006 11
2007 11
2008 6
2009 10
2010 7
2011 7
2012 9
2013 4
2014 5
2015 14
2016 13
2017 6
2018 9
2019 8
2020 7
2021 8
2022 6
2023 6
2024 8
2025 4
Total 225
Download as CSV

Liisa Lähteenmäki publications per year - data summary

  • Liisa Lähteenmäki, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Aarhus University, has 225 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993 and 1997, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.6 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 32 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 52 publications (4.3 per year); 2004-2015: 98 publications (8.2 per year); 2016-2025: 75 publications (7.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Liisa Lähteenmäki publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liisa Lähteenmäki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 201 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 201
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Liisa Lähteenmäki publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Liisa Lähteenmäki, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Aarhus University, records 201 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Liisa Lähteenmäki, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Liisa Lähteenmäki ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Liisa Lähteenmäki D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liisa Lähteenmäki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Liisa Lähteenmäki D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Liisa Lähteenmäki, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Aarhus University, records 60 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Liisa Lähteenmäki, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Liisa Lähteenmäki ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Liisa Lähteenmäki is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and specializes in research bridging medicine, agricultural and biological sciences. Their work predominantly addresses public health, environmental and occupational health, food science, marketing, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their research focuses on multiple topics, including:

  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Recent publications by Liisa Lähteenmäki reflect a range of subjects concerning consumer behavior, food systems, and sustainability. Notable papers include:

  • "Issues surrounding consumer trust and acceptance of existing and emerging food processing technologies," 2020, published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
  • "Consumer-related antecedents of food provisioning behaviors that promote food waste," 2022, published in Food Policy
  • "Research and innovation as a catalyst for food system transformation," 2020, published in Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • "Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations," 2023, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "No lockdown in the kitchen: How the COVID-19 pandemic has affected food-related behaviours," 2021, published in Food Research International

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Klaus G. Grunert
  • Violeta Stancu
  • Gert W. Meijer
  • Lisa Stickel
  • Leonardo Casini

Lähteenmäki often publishes in journals such as:

  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • Food Research International
  • CrimRxiv

Best Publications

  • Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour

    Anne Arvola;M. Vassallo;M. Dean;Piritta Lampila

  • Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste.

    Violeta Stancu;Pernille Haugaard;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods.

    K Roininen;L Lähteenmäki;H Tuorila

  • Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines

    Violeta Stefan;Erica van Herpen;Ana Alina Tudoran;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods

    Hely Tuorila;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Leena Pohjalainen;Leila Lotti

  • Exploring consumers perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association

    Katariina Roininen;Anne Arvola;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods

    Nina Urala;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Consumers’ changing attitudes towards functional foods

    Nina Urala;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Gut bacteria and health foods--the European perspective.

    Maria Saarela;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Ross Crittenden;Seppo Salminen

  • Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices

    Nina Urala;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Claiming health in food products

    Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts

    Wim Verbeke;Joachim Scholderer;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification : results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries

    Klaus G Grunert;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Niels Asger Nielsen;Jacob B Poulsen

  • Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: the effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia.

    A. Arvola;L. Lähteenmäki;H. Tuorila

  • Viscosity of Oat Bran-Enriched Beverages Influences Gastrointestinal Hormonal Responses in Healthy Humans

    Kristiina R. Juvonen;Anna-Kaisa Purhonen;Marjatta Salmenkallio-Marttila;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Impact of health-related claims on the perception of other product attributes

    Liisa Lähteenmäki;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Piritta Lampila;Klaus Grunert;Yasemin Boztug

  • Willingness to use functional breads. Applying the Health Belief Model across four European countries

    Marco Vassallo;Anna Saba;Anne Arvola;Moira Dean

  • Reducing the sodium content in meat products: The effect of the formulation in low-sodium ground meat patties

    Marita Ruusunen;Jukka Vainionpää;Marika Lyly;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Socio-Demographic Predictors of Food Waste Behavior in Denmark and Spain

    Alessandra C. Grasso;Margreet R. Olthof;Anja J. Boevé;Corné van Dooren

  • Country-wise differences in perception of health-related messages in cereal-based food products

    A. Saba;M. Vassallo;R. Shepherd;P. Lampila

  • Consumer perceptions of healthy cereal products and production methods

    M. Dean;R. Shepherd;Anne Arvola;M. Vassallo

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus G. Grunert
Klaus G. Grunert Aarhus University
Moira Dean
Moira Dean Queen's University Belfast
Richard Shepherd
Richard Shepherd University of Surrey
Hely Tuorila
Hely Tuorila University of Helsinki
Kaisa Poutanen
Kaisa Poutanen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Monique Raats
Monique Raats University of Surrey
Marjaana Lindeman
Marjaana Lindeman University of Helsinki
Berit L. Heitmann
Berit L. Heitmann Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA, a range of flexible online degree options are available. These programs allow you to specialize in areas like psychology, counseling, and education, without the need to relocate or disrupt your schedule.

If your career ambitions include clinical practice or academic research in psychology, exploring online psyd programs is a strong starting point. Those aiming for a focused career in marriage and family counseling may consider online mft programs, which offer pathways to licensure and practical experience.

Budget-conscious students can take advantage of affordable online psychology masters to gain advanced knowledge without significant financial barriers. Alternatively, educators looking to move into leadership or policy-making roles might be interested in edd degrees that offer fast-track formats for working professionals.

Each of these online degree options provides prospective students with unique career pathways and the flexibility needed to balance education and life responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Liisa Lähteenmäki

Trending Scientists