World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4673 4321 38 36 152 9105

Joachim Scholderer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joachim Scholderer between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joachim Scholderer published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 2 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 2 publications
1998 2026

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joachim Scholderer: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 9
2005 10
2006 8
2007 14
2008 16
2009 4
2010 6
2011 11
2012 11
2013 5
2014 2
2015 5
2016 5
2017 9
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 1
2022 7
2023 5
2024 4
2025 0
2026 2
Total 164
Download as CSV

Joachim Scholderer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Scholderer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 152 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 152
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Joachim Scholderer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Scholderer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Joachim Scholderer is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Life Sciences in Norway. Their research primarily falls within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant focus on Food Science. Subfields of study include Sociology and Political Science, Pollution, Strategy and Management, and Plant Science.

The main topics addressed in Scholderer's work cover Food Safety and Hygiene, Energy and Environment Impacts, Risk Perception and Management, Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability, Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems, Environmental Education and Sustainability, and Organic Food and Agriculture.

Scholderer's recent papers demonstrate a focus on diverse issues related to food safety, sustainability, and network effects in destination development:

  • Conflicting Issues of Sustainable Consumption and Food Safety: Risky Consumer Behaviors in Reducing Food Waste and Plastic Packaging (2022), published in Foods
  • Effects of network relations on destination development and business results (2021), published in Tourism Management
  • Situated Food Safety Risk and the Influence of Social Norms (2020), published in Risk Analysis
  • Realising the transition to bioenergy: Integrating entrepreneurial business models into the biogas socio-technical system in Uganda (2021), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • A trans disciplinary and multi actor approach to develop high impact food safety messages to consumers: Time for a revision of the WHO - Five keys to safer food? (2023), published in Trends in Food Science & Technology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gyula Kasza
  • Tekla Izsó
  • Solveig Langsrud
  • Nina Veflen Olsen
  • Eszter Csenki

Scholderer's publications often appear in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Foods

Best Publications

  • Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust

    Lynn J. Frewer;Joachim Scholderer;Lone Bredahl

  • Societal aspects of genetically modified foods.

    L.J. Frewer;J. Lassen;B. Kettlitz;J. Scholderer

  • Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information.

    Wim Verbeke;Lynn J. Frewer;Joachim Scholderer;Hubert F. De Brabander

  • Consumer acceptance of functional foods: issues for the future

    Lynn Frewer;Joachim Scholderer;Nigel Lambert

  • Closing the gap between values and behavior—a means–end theory of lifestyle

    Karen Brunsø;Joachim Scholderer;Klaus G. Grunert

  • Functional foods in Europe: consumer research, market experiences and regulatory aspects

    Tino Bech-Larsen;Joachim Scholderer

  • Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts

    Wim Verbeke;Joachim Scholderer;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • The Biotechnology Communication Paradox: Experimental Evidence and the Need for a New Strategy

    Joachim Scholderer;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption.

    Zuzanna Pieniak;Wim Verbeke;J Scholderer

  • Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe

    Joachim Scholderer;Karen Brunsø;Lone Bredahl;Klaus G. Grunert

  • Exploring the relationship between convenience and fish consumption: a cross-cultural study.

    Svein Ottar Olsen;Joachim Scholderer;Karen Brunsø;Wim Verbeke

  • Perceived barriers to consumption of fish among Norwegian women.

    Torbjørn Trondsen;Joachim Scholderer;Eiliv Lund;Anne E Eggen

  • Consumers, food and convenience: The long way from resource constraints to actual consumption patterns

    Joachim Scholderer;Klaus G. Grunert

  • European consumers’ use of and trust in information sources about fish

    Zuzanna Pieniak;Wim Verbeke;Joachim Scholderer;Karen Brunsø

  • Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production

    Klaus G. Grunert;Lone Bredahl;Joachim Scholderer

  • Testing relationships between values and food-related lifestyle: results from two European countries.

    Karen Brunsø;Joachim Scholderer;Klaus G. Grunert

  • Consumer perception of the quality of beef resulting from various fattening regimes

    Karen Brunsø;Lone Bredahl;Klaus G. Grunert;Joachim Scholderer

  • Impact of consumers' health beliefs, health involvement and risk perception on fish consumption: A study in five European countries

    Zuzanna Pieniak;Wim Verbeke;Joachim Scholderer;Karen Brunsø

  • Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector

    Klaus Grunert Grunert;Wim Verbeke;Jens O Kugler;Faiza Saeed

  • User-oriented innovation in the food sector: Relevant streams of research and an agenda for future work

    Klaus G. Grunert;Birger Boutrup Jensen;Anne-Mette Sonne;Karen Brunsø

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus G. Grunert
Klaus G. Grunert Aarhus University
Wim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke Ghent University
Svein Ottar Olsen
Svein Ottar Olsen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Lynn J. Frewer
Lynn J. Frewer Newcastle University
Liisa Lähteenmäki
Liisa Lähteenmäki Aarhus University
Arnout R. H. Fischer
Arnout R. H. Fischer Wageningen University & Research
Theo C.M. Brock
Theo C.M. Brock Wageningen University & Research
Colin D. Brown
Colin D. Brown University of York
Keith R. Solomon
Keith R. Solomon University of Guelph

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in social sciences or humanities, there are a wide array of online degrees and career routes to explore in the U.S. Accredited programs now make it possible to pursue advanced studies, like online msw programs, from anywhere, offering both flexibility and affordability. These programs can pave the way for fulfilling careers in counseling, policy, and public service.

For those with an interest in special education and applied behavior analysis, bcba masters programs online offer specialized training that prepares graduates for certification and high-demand roles. Alternatively, students aiming for a fast-track to social welfare careers can look at masters in social work online, which provides accelerated options for faster completion.

Psychology is another versatile field—an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online can lead to job opportunities in mental health, research, and human resources. Each pathway prepares graduates with vital skills and real-world experiences, supporting diverse and meaningful careers after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Scholderer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles