World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
10367
World Ranking
9098
National Ranking
3835

Michael T. Alkire publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Alkire sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael T. Alkire D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Alkire sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael T. Alkire is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience, with contributions to related subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics such as Neural dynamics and brain function, Sleep and Wakefulness Research, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Anesthesia and Sedative Agents, Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

Michael T. Alkire has published multiple papers in notable scientific journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • Foundations of Human Consciousness: Imaging the Twilight Zone (2020), published in the Journal of Neuroscience
  • Decreased Thalamic Activity Is a Correlate for Disconnectedness during Anesthesia with Propofol, Dexmedetomidine and Sevoflurane But Not S-Ketamine (2023), published in the Journal of Neuroscience
  • Thalamic activity is a neural correlate of connected consciousness (2023), published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael T. Alkire include:

  • A Scheinin
  • Oskari Kantonen
  • Jaakko Långsjö
  • Roosa Kallionpää
  • Kaike K. Kaisti

The scientist's work has appeared in several recurrent publication venues, notably:

  • Journal of Neuroscience (2 publications)
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • Consciousness and Anesthesia

    Michael T. Alkire;Anthony G. Hudetz;Giulio Tononi

  • Amygdala activity at encoding correlated with long-term, free recall of emotional information.

    Larry Cahill;Richard J. Haier;James Fallon;Michael T. Alkire

  • Structural brain variation and general intelligence.

    Richard J. Haier;Rex E. Jung;Ronald A. Yeo;Kevin Head

  • Epinephrine enhancement of human memory consolidation: interaction with arousal at encoding

    Larry Cahill;Michael T. Alkire

  • Sex-related difference in amygdala activity during emotionally influenced memory storage.

    Larry Cahill;Richard J. Haier;T. Nathan S. White;James Fallon

  • The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters

    Richard J. Haier;Rex E. Jung;Ronald A. Yeo;Kevin Head

  • Toward a unified theory of narcosis: brain imaging evidence for a thalamocortical switch as the neurophysiologic basis of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

    M.T. Alkire;R.J. Haier;J.H. Fallon

  • Cerebral metabolism during propofol anesthesia in humans studied with positron emission tomography

    Michael T. Alkire;Richard J. Haier;Steven J. Barker;Nitin K. Shah

  • General anesthesia and the neural correlates of consciousness.

    Michael T Alkire;Jason Miller

  • Thalamic Microinjection of Nicotine Reverses Sevoflurane-induced Loss of Righting Reflex in the Rat

    Michael T. Alkire;Jayme R. McReynolds;Emily L. Hahn;Akash N. Trivedi

  • Positron Emission Tomography Study of Regional Cerebral Metabolism in Humans during Isoflurane Anesthesia

    Michael T. Alkire;Richard J. Haier;Nitin K. Shah;Cynthia T. Anderson

  • Functional Brain Imaging during Anesthesia in Humans Effects of Halothane on Global and Regional Cerebral Glucose Metabolism

    Michael T. Alkire;Chris J. D. Pomfrett;Richard J. Haier;Marc V. Gianzero

  • Returning from Oblivion: Imaging the Neural Core of Consciousness

    Jaakko W. Långsjö;Michael T. Alkire;Kimmo Kaskinoro;Hiroki Hayama

  • Impaired thalamocortical connectivity in humans during general-anesthetic-induced unconsciousness

    Nathan S White;Michael T Alkire

  • Quantitative EEG Correlations with Brain Glucose Metabolic Rate during Anesthesia in Volunteers

    Michael T. Alkire

  • Individual differences in general intelligence correlate with brain function during nonreasoning tasks

    Richard J Haier;Nathan S White;Michael T Alkire

  • A voxel-based morphometric study of nondemented adults with Down Syndrome.

    Nathan S White;Michael T Alkire;Richard J Haier

  • Evolution of consciousness: Phylogeny, ontogeny, and emergence from general anesthesia

    George A. Mashour;Michael T. Alkire

  • Hippocampal, but not amygdala, activity at encoding correlates with long-term, free recall of nonemotional information

    Michael T. Alkire;Richard J. Haier;James H. Fallon;Larry Cahill

  • Thalamic microinfusion of antibody to a voltage-gated potassium channel restores consciousness during anesthesia.

    Michael T. Alkire;Christopher D. Asher;Amanda M. Franciscus;Emily L. Hahn

  • Cerebral Metabolism During Pr??pofol Anesthesia in Humans Studied with Positron Emission Tomography

    Michael T. Alkire;Richard J. Haier;Steven I. Barker;Nitin K Shah

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Haier
Richard J. Haier University of California, Irvine
Larry Cahill
Larry Cahill University of California, Irvine
James H. Fallon
James H. Fallon University of California, Irvine
Harry Scheinin
Harry Scheinin Turku University Hospital
Antti Revonsuo
Antti Revonsuo University of Turku
Ronald A. Yeo
Ronald A. Yeo University of New Mexico
George A. Mashour
George A. Mashour University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anthony G. Hudetz
Anthony G. Hudetz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rex E. Jung
Rex E. Jung University of New Mexico
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, several related online degrees and career pathways can expand your professional opportunities. For those aiming to work in clinical or counseling settings, online psyd programs offer flexible paths to advanced psychology practice without needing to relocate.

Students seeking a quicker route to careers in therapy may consider accelerated mft programs that provide intensive, streamlined training. These programs are ideal for those eager to work as marriage and family therapists or similar counseling roles.

For undergraduates, exploring accelerated bachelors degrees can save time and allow you to enter the workforce or graduate study more quickly. Many institutions now offer online options in biological sciences, psychology, and related majors.

Finally, if earning potential is a major concern, it may help to research the most valuable degree in the world to see which majors provide the best return on investment. This can guide your choices as you build a career in neuroscience or other scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Alkire

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles