World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
4903
World Ranking
8181
National Ranking
2915

Brian E. Haggard publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian E. Haggard sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 193 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Brian E. Haggard D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian E. Haggard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian E. Haggard is affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science with a specialization in Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Oceanography, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The scientist's main topics of work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Water Quality and Pollution Assessment, Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, Water Quality and Resources Studies, and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies.

Brian E. Haggard has published in several venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education
  • Journal of the ASABE
  • Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems
  • Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
  • Scientific Reports

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Brian E. Haggard include:

  • "Global mapping of freshwater nutrient enrichment and periphyton growth potential," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms," 2021, Harmful Algae
  • "Sediment phosphorus release sustains nuisance periphyton growth when nitrogen is not limiting," 2020, Journal of Limnology
  • "A Review of Machine Learning Models for Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring in Freshwater Systems," 2023, Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems
  • "Chlorophyll and Phycocyanin Raw Fluorescence May Inform Recreational Lake Managers on Cyanobacterial HABs and Toxins: Lake Fayetteville Case Study," 2023, Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Collaborations feature several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Bradley J. Austin
  • J. Thad Scott
  • Erin M. Grantz
  • Nicole D. Wagner
  • Debabrata Sahoo

Best Publications

  • Phosphorus Mitigation to Control River Eutrophication: Murky Waters, Inconvenient Truths, and “Postnormal” Science

    Helen P. Jarvie;Andrew N. Sharpley;Paul J. A. Withers;J. Thad Scott

  • Development of a phosphorus index for pastures fertilized with poultry litter--factors affecting phosphorus runoff.

    Paul B. DeLaune;Philip A. Moore;Dennis K. Carman;Andrew N. Sharpley

  • Nutrient retention in a point-source-enriched stream

    Brian E. Haggard;Emily H. Stanley;Daniel E. Storm

  • Pharmaceuticals and other organic chemicals in selected north-central and northwestern Arkansas streams.

    Unknown

  • EFFECT OF A POINT SOURCE INPUT ON STREAM NUTRIENT RETENTION

    Brian E. Haggard;Daniel E. Storm;Emily H. Stanley

  • Within-River Phosphorus Retention: Accounting for a Missing Piece in the Watershed Phosphorus Puzzle

    Helen P. Jarvie;Andrew N. Sharpley;J. Thad Scott;Brian E. Haggard

  • Evaluation of the phosphorus source component in the phosphorus index for pastures.

    P. B. DeLaune;P. A. Moore;D. K. Carman;A. N. Sharpley

  • Dissolved phosphorus concentrations and sediment interactions in effluent-dominated Ozark streams

    S.A. Ekka;B.E. Haggard;M.D. Matlock;I. Chaubey

  • Sediment phosphorus dynamics for three tile fed drainage ditches in Northeast Indiana

    D.R. Smith;B.E. Haggard;E.A. Warnemuende;C. Huang

  • PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR DISCHARGE AND WATER QUALITY DATA COLLECTION ON SMALL WATERSHEDS

    R. D. Harmel;K. W. King;B. E. Haggard;D. G. Wren

  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations and Export from an Ozark Plateau Catchment in the United States

    B.E. Haggard;P.A. Moore;I. Chaubey;E.H. Stanley

  • Decreasing phosphorus runoff losses from land-applied poultry litter with dietary modifications and alum addition.

    Douglas R. Smith;P. A. Moore;D. M. Miles;B. E. Haggard

  • Managing natural processes in drainage ditches for nonpoint source phosphorus control

    Andrew N. Sharpley;Tore Krogstad;Peter J A Kleinman;Brian Haggard

  • Water Quality Impacts of Converting to a Poultry Litter Fertilization Strategy

    R. D. Harmel;H. A. Torbert;B. E. Haggard;R. Haney

  • Reducing Phosphorus Runoff from Swine Manure with Dietary Phytase and Aluminum Chloride

    D. R. Smith;P. A. Moore;C. V. Maxwell;B. E. Haggard

  • A review of stream nutrient criteria development in the United States.

    M. A. Evans-White;B. E. Haggard;J. T. Scott

  • Variations in stream water and sediment phosphorus among select Ozark catchments.

    Brian E. Haggard;Douglas R. Smith;Kristofor R. Brye

  • Stoichiometric imbalance in rates of nitrogen and phosphorus retention, storage, and recycling can perpetuate nitrogen deficiency in highly‐productive reservoirs

    Erin M. Grantz;Brian E. Haggard;J. Thad Scott

  • SEDIMENT-PHOSPHORUS RELATIONSHIPS IN THREE NORTHCENTRAL OKLAHOMA STREAMS

    B. E. Haggard;E. H. Stanley;R. Hyler

  • Antibiotic fate and transport in three effluent-dominated Ozark streams

    Leslie B. Massey;Brian E. Haggard;Joel M. Galloway;Keith A. Loftin

  • Phosphorus flux from bottom sediments in Lake Eucha, Oklahoma.

    B. E. Haggard;P. A. Moore;P. B. DeLaune

  • Global mapping of freshwater nutrient enrichment and periphyton growth potential

    Richard McDowell;A. Noble;P. Pletnyakov;B. E. Haggard

Frequent Co-Authors

Indrajeet Chaubey
Indrajeet Chaubey University of Connecticut
Andrew N. Sharpley
Andrew N. Sharpley University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Kristofor R. Brye
Kristofor R. Brye University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Tommy C. Daniel
Tommy C. Daniel University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Douglas R. Smith
Douglas R. Smith Agricultural Research Service
Philip A. Moore
Philip A. Moore Agricultural Research Service
Gurpal S. Toor
Gurpal S. Toor University of Maryland, College Park
Garey A. Fox
Garey A. Fox North Carolina State University
Helen P. Jarvie
Helen P. Jarvie University of Waterloo
Emily H. Stanley
Emily H. Stanley University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students seek the easiest degree to get as a starting point, balancing their passion with manageable coursework. This often leads to quicker entry into environmental roles or further specialization.

Online programs such as the online geology degree offer targeted knowledge of the earth’s processes, vital for careers in natural resource management or environmental consulting. Geology degrees complement Environmental Sciences by providing geological context to environmental challenges.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly in demand. Programs recognized as the best GIS graduate programs provide technical expertise in mapping and spatial analysis, crucial for environmental planning, conservation, and resource management.

For professionals aiming to influence environmental policy or public administration, pursuing the best online MPA programs equips students with leadership and management skills necessary for impactful careers in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Brian E. Haggard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles