World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2450 2240 1421 1271 167 21647

Richard J. Haier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard J. Haier between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard J. Haier published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2023. 1 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2023. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1977 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard J. Haier: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 3
1979 5
1980 5
1981 2
1982 4
1983 8
1984 7
1985 4
1986 2
1987 5
1988 4
1989 6
1990 5
1991 2
1992 4
1993 1
1994 5
1995 7
1996 9
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 6
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 5
2008 3
2009 8
2010 6
2011 3
2012 3
2013 4
2014 5
2015 0
2016 10
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 29
2024 0
2025 1
Total 205
Download as CSV

Richard J. Haier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Haier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 167
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard J. Haier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Haier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard J. Haier is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine, in the United States. Their research broadly spans several disciplines, with a primary focus on psychology and neuroscience, complemented by work in computer science.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science

Within these fields, Haier's subfields of specialization cover:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Genetics

Their research topics emphasize cognitive processes and brain function, including:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Haier has contributed articles to multiple publication venues, primarily:

  • Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • Intelligence

Recent papers include:

  • Academic freedom and social responsibility: Finding a balance, 2020, published in Intelligence
  • Are we thinking big enough about the road ahead? Overview of the special issue on the future of intelligence research, 2021, published in Intelligence
  • Index, 2021, published in Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • Index, 2023, published in Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • Index, 2023, published in Cambridge University Press eBooks

Haier has also authored books published by Cambridge University Press. Two noted titles from 2023 are:

  • The Science of Human Intelligence
  • The Neuroscience of Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in Haier's work include:

  • Roberto Colom
  • Earl Hunt
  • Aron K. Barbey
  • Sherif Karama

Best Publications

  • The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence.

    Rex E. Jung;Richard J. Haier

  • Schizophrenia: The epigenetic puzzle

    Richard J. Haier

  • Amygdala activity at encoding correlated with long-term, free recall of emotional information.

    Larry Cahill;Richard J. Haier;James Fallon;Michael T. Alkire

  • Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography

    Richard J. Haier;Benjamin V. Siegel;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Erin Hazlett

  • Structural brain variation and general intelligence.

    Richard J. Haier;Rex E. Jung;Ronald A. Yeo;Kevin Head

  • Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study.

    Richard J. Haier;Benjamin V. Siegel;Andrew MacLachlan;Eric Soderling

  • Sex-related difference in amygdala activity during emotionally influenced memory storage.

    Larry Cahill;Richard J. Haier;T. Nathan S. White;James Fallon

  • Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning

    Richard J. Haier;Benjamin V. Siegel;Chuck Tang;Lennart Abel

  • The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters

    Richard J. Haier;Rex E. Jung;Ronald A. Yeo;Kevin Head

  • Toward a unified theory of narcosis: brain imaging evidence for a thalamocortical switch as the neurophysiologic basis of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

    M.T. Alkire;R.J. Haier;J.H. Fallon

  • Neuroanatomy of creativity.

    Rex E. Jung;Rex E. Jung;Judith M. Segall;H. Jeremy Bockholt;Ranee A. Flores

  • Frontostriatal disorder of cerebral metabolism in never-medicated schizophrenics.

    M S Buchsbaum;R J Haier;S G Potkin;K Nuechterlein

  • Glucose metabolic rate in normals and schizophrenics during the Continuous Performance Test assessed by positron emission tomography.

    Monte S. Buchsbaum;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Richard J. Haier;Joseph Wu

  • Cerebral metabolism during propofol anesthesia in humans studied with positron emission tomography

    Michael T. Alkire;Richard J. Haier;Steven J. Barker;Nitin K. Shah

  • PET and MRI of the Thalamus in Never-Medicated Patients With Schizophrenia

    Monte S. Buchsbaum;Toshiyuki Someya;Chuck Ying Teng;Lennart Abel

  • Human intelligence and brain networks

    Roberto Colom;Sherif Karama;Rex E. Jung;Richard J. Haier

  • Distributed brain sites for the g-factor of intelligence.

    Roberto Colom;Rex E. Jung;Richard J. Haier

  • A controlled trial of desipramine in 18 men with posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Christopher Reist;Curtis D. Kauffmann;Richard J. Haier;Christopher Sangdahl

  • Intrinsic Enjoyment and Boredom Coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential and attention measures.

    Jean A. Hamilton;Jean A. Hamilton;Richard J. Haier;Monte S. Buchsbaum

  • Cortical-striatal-thalamic circuits and brain glucose metabolic activity in 70 unmedicated male schizophrenic patients.

    Benjamin V. Siegel;Monte S. Buchsbaum;William E. Bunney;Louis A. Gottschalk

  • MRI assessment of cortical thickness and functional activity changes in adolescent girls following three months of practice on a visual-spatial task

    Richard J Haier;Sherif Karama;Leonard Leyba;Rex E Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Monte S. Buchsbaum
Monte S. Buchsbaum University of California, San Diego
Michael T. Alkire
Michael T. Alkire University of California, Irvine
Rex E. Jung
Rex E. Jung University of New Mexico
Roberto Colom
Roberto Colom Autonomous University of Madrid
Sherif Karama
Sherif Karama McGill University
Joseph C. Wu
Joseph C. Wu Stanford University
Dennis L. Murphy
Dennis L. Murphy National Institutes of Health
James H. Fallon
James H. Fallon University of California, Irvine
Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Ronald A. Yeo
Ronald A. Yeo University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of related online degrees and career pathways, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. These fields are growing in demand, and many colleges now offer flexible online programs designed for working professionals and students seeking convenience without sacrificing quality.

When choosing a program, it is important to evaluate factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, and hands-on training opportunities. For those interested in specific regions, the best college counseling programs in Cleveland and the best college counseling programs in Georgia spotlight top-ranked schools with robust online and on-campus offerings.

Prospective students can also explore Iowa counseling degree programs or discover the best college counseling programs in Illinois to find a curriculum that aligns with their career goals. Graduates often pursue roles such as licensed counselors, school psychologists, or social workers, with additional pathways in research or higher education.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Haier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles