World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 110 393 345 249 215 490 50054

Keith H. Nuechterlein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith H. Nuechterlein between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith H. Nuechterlein published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2008. 12 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2008. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 7 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 19 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1977 2025

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith H. Nuechterlein: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 2
1983 3
1984 5
1985 1
1986 7
1987 2
1988 6
1989 19
1990 7
1991 14
1992 9
1993 13
1994 11
1995 10
1996 8
1997 12
1998 8
1999 12
2000 12
2001 7
2002 10
2003 16
2004 13
2005 16
2006 14
2007 6
2008 25
2009 21
2010 17
2011 19
2012 12
2013 6
2014 22
2015 23
2016 10
2017 20
2018 9
2019 13
2020 17
2021 11
2022 11
2023 6
2024 7
2025 5
Total 504
Download as CSV

Keith H. Nuechterlein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith H. Nuechterlein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–490 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 490 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28 490
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith H. Nuechterlein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith H. Nuechterlein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35 110
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Joseph Zubin Award, Society for Research in Psychopathology
  • 1995 - Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award

Overview

Keith H. Nuechterlein is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on understanding and treating schizophrenia through various cognitive and psychiatric approaches. The scientist has contributed significantly to studies exploring cognitive training, functional gains, and the clinical characterization of psychosis.

The scientist's work spans several fields of study, including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Within these broad fields, they specifically contribute to Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Philosophy.

Key research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Frequent collaborators in their research include Joseph Ventura, Kenneth L. Subotnik, Michael F. Green, David Braff, and William S. Stone, indicating a networked approach to psychiatric and cognitive research.

The primary venues where the scientist has published reflect their focus on psychiatric disorders and cognitive studies. These venues include:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Keith H. Nuechterlein represent core research areas:

  • "Aerobic exercise enhances cognitive training effects in first-episode schizophrenia: randomized clinical trial demonstrates cognitive and functional gains," 2022, Psychological Medicine
  • "A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and long-acting injectable risperidone after a first episode of schizophrenia: improving cognition and work/school functioning," 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • "Relationship of poor insight to neurocognition, social cognition, and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis," 2020, Schizophrenia Research
  • "The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management," 2021, World Psychiatry
  • "Anticholinergic Medication Burden-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia," 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry

The scientist has been recognized with awards including the Joseph Zubin Award from the Society for Research in Psychopathology in 2012 and the Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award in 1995. These honors reflect their contribution to psychopathology research.

Best Publications

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;M Deanna;James M. Gold;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Information Processing and Attentional Functioning in the Developmental Course of Schizophrenic Disorders

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson

  • A Heuristic Vulnerability/Stress Model of Schizophrenic Episodes

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography

    Richard J. Haier;Benjamin V. Siegel;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Erin Hazlett

  • Family factors and the course of bipolar affective disorder.

    David J. Miklowitz;Michael J. Goldstein;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Karen S. Snyder

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization.

    Robert S. Kern;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Lyle E. Baade

  • Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

    George Bartzokis;Mace Beckson;Po H. Lu;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Symptom Monitoring in the Rehabilitation of Schizophrenic Patients

    David Lukoff;Robert Paul Liberman;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    Joseph Ventura;Gerhard S. Hellemann;April D. Thames;Vanessa Koellner

  • Developmental Processes in Schizophrenic Disorders: Longitudinal Studies of Vulnerability and Stress

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson;Michael Gitlin;Joseph Ventura

  • Neuroleptic withdrawal in schizophrenic patients. A review of the literature.

    P L Gilbert;M J Harris;L A McAdams;D V Jeste

  • Signal detection in vigilance tasks and behavioral attributes among offspring of schizophrenic mothers and among hyperactive children.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Should Schizophrenia Be Treated as a Neurocognitive Disorder

    Michael Foster Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Raja Parasuraman;Qiyuan Jiang

  • White Matter Structural Integrity in Healthy Aging Adults and Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    George Bartzokis;Jeffrey L. Cummings;David Sultzer;Victor W. Henderson

  • A Summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS Workshop on Clinical Trial Design for Neurocognitive Drugs for Schizophrenia

    Robert W Buchanan;Miriam Davis;Donald Goff;Michael F Green

  • Aerobic Exercise Improves Cognitive Functioning in People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Joseph Firth;Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Simon Rosenbaum;Davy Vancampfort

  • Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical "disconnection" in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;David Sultzer;David Sultzer;Po H Lu;Po H Lu;Keith H Nuechterlein

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia, Part 1: Performance Across Phase of Illness

    Michael F. Green;Carrie E. Bearden;Tyrone D. Cannon;Alan P. Fiske

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Green
Michael F. Green University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth L. Subotnik
Kenneth L. Subotnik University of California, Los Angeles
Joseph Ventura
Joseph Ventura University of California, Los Angeles
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gregory A. Light
Gregory A. Light University of California, San Diego
Jeremy M. Silverman
Jeremy M. Silverman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ming T. Tsuang
Ming T. Tsuang University of California, San Diego
David L. Braff
David L. Braff University of California, San Diego
Robert F. Asarnow
Robert F. Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering advancing your education in psychology, there are a variety of online degree options to explore. One of the first questions many students have is how long does a psychology degree take? Degree timelines can range from a few years for a bachelor's to several more for graduate programs, depending on your academic and career goals.

For those interested in clinical practice, you might look into how to get a psyd in clinical psychology, which is a doctoral-level pathway focused on preparing graduates for work as licensed psychologists.

Psychology graduates also enjoy diverse job prospects. For example, you could pursue roles in business with jobs in industrial-organizational psychology, applying psychological principles to workplace challenges and human resource management.

Still wondering if this field is the right fit? Learn more about whether is studying psychology worth it based on career opportunities, salary expectations, and the personal meaning the degree can bring to your life.

Best Scientists Citing Keith H. Nuechterlein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles