World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
110
Citations
50054
World Ranking
393
National Ranking
249

Keith H. Nuechterlein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith H. Nuechterlein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 490 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Keith H. Nuechterlein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith H. Nuechterlein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Joseph Zubin Award, Society for Research in Psychopathology
  • 1995 - Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award

Overview

Keith H. Nuechterlein is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on understanding and treating schizophrenia through various cognitive and psychiatric approaches. The scientist has contributed significantly to studies exploring cognitive training, functional gains, and the clinical characterization of psychosis.

The scientist's work spans several fields of study, including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Within these broad fields, they specifically contribute to Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Philosophy.

Key research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Frequent collaborators in their research include Joseph Ventura, Kenneth L. Subotnik, Michael F. Green, David Braff, and William S. Stone, indicating a networked approach to psychiatric and cognitive research.

The primary venues where the scientist has published reflect their focus on psychiatric disorders and cognitive studies. These venues include:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Keith H. Nuechterlein represent core research areas:

  • "Aerobic exercise enhances cognitive training effects in first-episode schizophrenia: randomized clinical trial demonstrates cognitive and functional gains," 2022, Psychological Medicine
  • "A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and long-acting injectable risperidone after a first episode of schizophrenia: improving cognition and work/school functioning," 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • "Relationship of poor insight to neurocognition, social cognition, and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis," 2020, Schizophrenia Research
  • "The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management," 2021, World Psychiatry
  • "Anticholinergic Medication Burden-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia," 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry

The scientist has been recognized with awards including the Joseph Zubin Award from the Society for Research in Psychopathology in 2012 and the Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award in 1995. These honors reflect their contribution to psychopathology research.

Best Publications

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;M Deanna;James M. Gold;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Information Processing and Attentional Functioning in the Developmental Course of Schizophrenic Disorders

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson

  • A Heuristic Vulnerability/Stress Model of Schizophrenic Episodes

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography

    Richard J. Haier;Benjamin V. Siegel;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Erin Hazlett

  • Family factors and the course of bipolar affective disorder.

    David J. Miklowitz;Michael J. Goldstein;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Karen S. Snyder

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization.

    Robert S. Kern;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Lyle E. Baade

  • Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

    George Bartzokis;Mace Beckson;Po H. Lu;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Symptom Monitoring in the Rehabilitation of Schizophrenic Patients

    David Lukoff;Robert Paul Liberman;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    Joseph Ventura;Gerhard S. Hellemann;April D. Thames;Vanessa Koellner

  • Developmental Processes in Schizophrenic Disorders: Longitudinal Studies of Vulnerability and Stress

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael E. Dawson;Michael Gitlin;Joseph Ventura

  • Neuroleptic withdrawal in schizophrenic patients. A review of the literature.

    P L Gilbert;M J Harris;L A McAdams;D V Jeste

  • Signal detection in vigilance tasks and behavioral attributes among offspring of schizophrenic mothers and among hyperactive children.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Should Schizophrenia Be Treated as a Neurocognitive Disorder

    Michael Foster Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Raja Parasuraman;Qiyuan Jiang

  • White Matter Structural Integrity in Healthy Aging Adults and Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    George Bartzokis;Jeffrey L. Cummings;David Sultzer;Victor W. Henderson

  • A Summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS Workshop on Clinical Trial Design for Neurocognitive Drugs for Schizophrenia

    Robert W Buchanan;Miriam Davis;Donald Goff;Michael F Green

  • Aerobic Exercise Improves Cognitive Functioning in People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Joseph Firth;Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Simon Rosenbaum;Davy Vancampfort

  • Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical "disconnection" in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;David Sultzer;David Sultzer;Po H Lu;Po H Lu;Keith H Nuechterlein

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia, Part 1: Performance Across Phase of Illness

    Michael F. Green;Carrie E. Bearden;Tyrone D. Cannon;Alan P. Fiske

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Green
Michael F. Green University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth L. Subotnik
Kenneth L. Subotnik University of California, Los Angeles
Joseph Ventura
Joseph Ventura University of California, Los Angeles
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gregory A. Light
Gregory A. Light University of California, San Diego
Jeremy M. Silverman
Jeremy M. Silverman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ming T. Tsuang
Ming T. Tsuang University of California, San Diego
David L. Braff
David L. Braff University of California, San Diego
Robert F. Asarnow
Robert F. Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering advancing your education in psychology, there are a variety of online degree options to explore. One of the first questions many students have is how long does a psychology degree take? Degree timelines can range from a few years for a bachelor's to several more for graduate programs, depending on your academic and career goals.

For those interested in clinical practice, you might look into how to get a psyd in clinical psychology, which is a doctoral-level pathway focused on preparing graduates for work as licensed psychologists.

Psychology graduates also enjoy diverse job prospects. For example, you could pursue roles in business with jobs in industrial-organizational psychology, applying psychological principles to workplace challenges and human resource management.

Still wondering if this field is the right fit? Learn more about whether is studying psychology worth it based on career opportunities, salary expectations, and the personal meaning the degree can bring to your life.

Best Scientists Citing Keith H. Nuechterlein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles