World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 136 268 254 169 160 1028 101304
Psychology 139 117 101 72 61 797 104613
Neuroscience 139 199 179 130 114 814 105303

Deanna M. Barch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deanna M. Barch between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deanna M. Barch published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 26 papers a year. Output peaked at 105 publications in 2021. 105 of the 937 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 105. Peak 105 publications in 2021. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 75 publications 2021: 105 publications 2022: 81 publications 2023: 73 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 54 publications
1990 2025

937 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deanna M. Barch: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 3
1995 7
1996 6
1997 9
1998 9
1999 8
2000 3
2001 13
2002 4
2003 16
2004 10
2005 17
2006 9
2007 12
2008 25
2009 16
2010 19
2011 25
2012 31
2013 39
2014 24
2015 22
2016 52
2017 31
2018 41
2019 46
2020 75
2021 105
2022 81
2023 73
2024 51
2025 54
Total 937
Download as CSV

Deanna M. Barch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna M. Barch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 705+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 797 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100 797
Download as CSV

Deanna M. Barch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna M. Barch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8 139
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Deanna M. Barch is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting disciplines within medicine, psychology, and neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and clinical psychology.

The main fields of study covered in their work include Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these broad areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Their research topics reflect this multidisciplinary approach and include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Barch has published regularly in well-known scientific journals and venues. Key frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Their recent publications highlight a range of topics at the intersection of brain science and mental health:

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals, 2022, Nature
  • Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, 2023, JAMA
  • A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex, 2023, Nature
  • The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Associations Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Childhood Outcomes, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry

In terms of collaboration, Barch has frequently co-authored with several researchers including Joan L. Luby, Cynthia Rogers, Scott L. Rauch, Arielle Baskin-Sommers, and Raquel E. Gur. These collaborations reflect sustained partnerships contributing to significant publication outputs across mental health and neuroscience fields.

Best Publications

  • Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

    Matthew M. Botvinick;Todd S. Braver;Deanna M. Barch;Cameron S. Carter

  • The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An Overview

    David C. Van Essen;Stephen M. Smith;M Deanna;Timothy Edward John Behrens

  • Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance

    Cameron S. Carter;Cameron S. Carter;Todd S. Braver;Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;M Deanna;Matthew M. Botvinick;Matthew M. Botvinick

  • The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective

    D. C. Van Essen;Kamil Ugurbil;Edward J Auerbach

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

    Unknown

  • Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Binyam Nardos;Alexander L. Cohen;Damien A. Fair

  • The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

    B.J. Casey;B.J. Casey;Tariq Cannonier;May I. Conley;May I. Conley;Alexandra O. Cohen

  • Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior

    M Deanna;Gregory C. Burgess;Michael P. Harms;Steven E. Petersen

  • The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Joseph L. Price;Melissa M. Rundle

  • Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;M Deanna;James M. Gold;Terry E. Goldberg

  • The maturing architecture of the brain's default network.

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church

  • Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Julie M. Donnelly;John M. Ollinger

  • Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration

    Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict: Effects of Frequency, Inhibition and Errors

    Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;Jeremy R. Gray;David L. Molfese

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI

    S.M. Smith;D. Vidaurre;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;M.F. Glasser

  • Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5

    Rajiv Tandon;Wolfgang Gaebel;M Deanna;Juan Bustillo

  • The Effects of Poverty on Childhood Brain Development: The Mediating Effect of Caregiving and Stressful Life Events

    Joan Luby;Andy Belden;Kelly Botteron;Natasha Marrus

  • A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation

    Todd S Braver;Deanna M

  • Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms.

    M Deanna;Alan Ceaser

  • PRIORITY COMMUNICATION Increased Amygdala Response to Masked Emotional Faces in Depressed Subjects Resolves with Antidepressant Treatment: An fMRI Study

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Julie M. Donnelly;John M. Ollinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan L. Luby
Joan L. Luby Washington University in St. Louis
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
John G. Csernansky
John G. Csernansky Northwestern University
Michael P. Harms
Michael P. Harms Washington University in St. Louis
Todd S. Braver
Todd S. Braver Washington University in St. Louis
James M. Gold
James M. Gold University of Maryland, Baltimore
Steven M. Silverstein
Steven M. Silverstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Angus W. MacDonald
Angus W. MacDonald University of Minnesota
Diana J. Whalen
Diana J. Whalen Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees can open up many flexible career pathways. As the need for skilled mental health professionals grows, many universities across the USA offer reputable and affordable online programs. Choosing the right online degree is crucial—considering both the value of the program and how it matches your career goals.

Prospective students should research programs that deliver both quality education and affordability. For example, the best value counseling degrees in Texas and most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Wisconsin offer insights into top regional options. If you’re looking for graduate-level studies, you might consider the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida or explore the best value counseling master's degrees in the South for more options.

These programs can lead to careers in counseling, social work, school psychology, and mental health services, many of which are in high demand. By choosing high-value degrees, students position themselves for successful and rewarding careers in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Deanna M. Barch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles