World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
136
Citations
101304
World Ranking
268
National Ranking
169

Psychology

D-Index
139
Citations
104613
World Ranking
117
National Ranking
72

Neuroscience

D-Index
139
Citations
105303
World Ranking
199
National Ranking
130

Deanna M. Barch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna M. Barch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 797 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Deanna M. Barch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna M. Barch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Deanna M. Barch is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting disciplines within medicine, psychology, and neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and clinical psychology.

The main fields of study covered in their work include Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these broad areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Their research topics reflect this multidisciplinary approach and include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Barch has published regularly in well-known scientific journals and venues. Key frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Their recent publications highlight a range of topics at the intersection of brain science and mental health:

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals, 2022, Nature
  • Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, 2023, JAMA
  • A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex, 2023, Nature
  • The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Associations Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Childhood Outcomes, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry

In terms of collaboration, Barch has frequently co-authored with several researchers including Joan L. Luby, Cynthia Rogers, Scott L. Rauch, Arielle Baskin-Sommers, and Raquel E. Gur. These collaborations reflect sustained partnerships contributing to significant publication outputs across mental health and neuroscience fields.

Best Publications

  • Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

    Matthew M. Botvinick;Todd S. Braver;Deanna M. Barch;Cameron S. Carter

  • The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An Overview

    David C. Van Essen;Stephen M. Smith;M Deanna;Timothy Edward John Behrens

  • Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance

    Cameron S. Carter;Cameron S. Carter;Todd S. Braver;Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;M Deanna;Matthew M. Botvinick;Matthew M. Botvinick

  • The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective

    D. C. Van Essen;Kamil Ugurbil;Edward J Auerbach

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

    Unknown

  • Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Binyam Nardos;Alexander L. Cohen;Damien A. Fair

  • The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

    B.J. Casey;B.J. Casey;Tariq Cannonier;May I. Conley;May I. Conley;Alexandra O. Cohen

  • Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior

    M Deanna;Gregory C. Burgess;Michael P. Harms;Steven E. Petersen

  • The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Joseph L. Price;Melissa M. Rundle

  • Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;M Deanna;James M. Gold;Terry E. Goldberg

  • The maturing architecture of the brain's default network.

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church

  • Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Julie M. Donnelly;John M. Ollinger

  • Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration

    Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict: Effects of Frequency, Inhibition and Errors

    Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;Jeremy R. Gray;David L. Molfese

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI

    S.M. Smith;D. Vidaurre;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;Christian Beckmann;M.F. Glasser

  • Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5

    Rajiv Tandon;Wolfgang Gaebel;M Deanna;Juan Bustillo

  • The Effects of Poverty on Childhood Brain Development: The Mediating Effect of Caregiving and Stressful Life Events

    Joan Luby;Andy Belden;Kelly Botteron;Natasha Marrus

  • A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation

    Todd S Braver;Deanna M

  • Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms.

    M Deanna;Alan Ceaser

  • PRIORITY COMMUNICATION Increased Amygdala Response to Masked Emotional Faces in Depressed Subjects Resolves with Antidepressant Treatment: An fMRI Study

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Julie M. Donnelly;John M. Ollinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan L. Luby
Joan L. Luby Washington University in St. Louis
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
John G. Csernansky
John G. Csernansky Northwestern University
Michael P. Harms
Michael P. Harms Washington University in St. Louis
Todd S. Braver
Todd S. Braver Washington University in St. Louis
James M. Gold
James M. Gold University of Maryland, Baltimore
Steven M. Silverstein
Steven M. Silverstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Angus W. MacDonald
Angus W. MacDonald University of Minnesota
Diana J. Whalen
Diana J. Whalen Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees can open up many flexible career pathways. As the need for skilled mental health professionals grows, many universities across the USA offer reputable and affordable online programs. Choosing the right online degree is crucial—considering both the value of the program and how it matches your career goals.

Prospective students should research programs that deliver both quality education and affordability. For example, the best value counseling degrees in Texas and most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Wisconsin offer insights into top regional options. If you’re looking for graduate-level studies, you might consider the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida or explore the best value counseling master's degrees in the South for more options.

These programs can lead to careers in counseling, social work, school psychology, and mental health services, many of which are in high demand. By choosing high-value degrees, students position themselves for successful and rewarding careers in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Deanna M. Barch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles