World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4580 4240 2544 2302 133 11626

Laurie E. Cutting publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laurie E. Cutting between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laurie E. Cutting published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2025. 24 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2025. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications
1997 2025

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laurie E. Cutting: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 6
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 8
2010 8
2011 1
2012 5
2013 8
2014 6
2015 3
2016 5
2017 6
2018 10
2019 14
2020 12
2021 10
2022 12
2023 10
2024 9
2025 15
Total 176
Download as CSV

Laurie E. Cutting publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Laurie E. Cutting D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Laurie E. Cutting is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology, with significant contributions in related subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, and Education.

The scientist's work focuses on multiple research topics, including:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Laurie E. Cutting has published research in prominent venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Mind Brain and Education
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Imaging Neuroscience
  • Cerebral Cortex

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Laurie E. Cutting are:

  • The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4, 2020, Learning and Individual Differences
  • Pandora: 4-D White Matter Bundle Population-Based Atlases Derived from Diffusion MRI Fiber Tractography, 2020, Neuroinformatics
  • Relations among Executive Function, Decoding, and Reading Comprehension: An Investigation of Sex Differences, 2020, Discourse Processes
  • Left posterior prefrontal regions support domain-general executive processes needed for both reading and math, 2020, Journal of Neuropsychology
  • Examination of common and unique brain regions for atypical reading and math: a meta-analysis, 2023, Cerebral Cortex

Laurie E. Cutting has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Bennett A. Landman
  • Kurt G. Schilling
  • Laura A. Barquero
  • Tin Q. Nguyen
  • François Rheault

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Reading Comprehension: Relative Contributions of Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, and Other Cognitive Skills Can Depend on How Comprehension Is Measured.

    Laurie E. Cutting;Hollis S. Scarborough

  • The Contribution of Executive Skills to Reading Comprehension

    Heather Whitney Sesma;E. Mark Mahone;Terry Levine;Sarah H. Eason

  • Executive Dysfunction Among Children With Reading Comprehension Deficits

    Gianna Locascio;E. Mark Mahone;Sarah H. Eason;Laurie E. Cutting

  • Validity of the behavior rating inventory of executive function in children with ADHD and/or Tourette syndrome

    E. Mark Mahone;Paul T. Cirino;Paul T. Cirino;Laurie E. Cutting;Laurie E. Cutting;Paula M. Cerrone;Paula M. Cerrone

  • Subtle executive impairment in children with autism and children with ADHD

    M. C. Goldberg;M. C. Goldberg;S. H. Mostofsky;S. H. Mostofsky;L. E. Cutting;L. E. Cutting;E. M. Mahone;E. M. Mahone

  • Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance

    Laurie E. Cutting;April Materek;Carolyn A. S. Cole;Carolyn A. S. Cole;Terry M. Levine

  • History and significance of rapid automatized naming

    Martha Bridge Denckla;Laurie E. Cutting

  • Reader-Text Interactions: How Differential Text and Question Types Influence Cognitive Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension.

    Sarah H. Eason;Lindsay F. Goldberg;Katherine M. Young;Megan C. Geist

  • 3D whole brain segmentation using spatially localized atlas network tiles

    Yuankai Huo;Zhoubing Xu;Yunxi Xiong;Katherine Aboud

  • Sex differences in cerebral laterality of language and visuospatial processing.

    A.M. Clements;S.L. Rimrodt;S.L. Rimrodt;J.R. Abel;J.G. Blankner

  • Effects of IQ on executive function measures in children with ADHD.

    E. Mark Mahone;Kathleen M. Hagelthorn;Kathleen M. Hagelthorn;Laurie E. Cutting;Laurie E. Cutting;Linda J. Schuerholz;Linda J. Schuerholz

  • Detection of synchronous brain activity in white matter tracts at rest and under functional loading.

    Zhaohua Ding;Yali Huang;Stephen K. Bailey;Yurui Gao

  • Learning Disabilities in English Language Learners: Identifying the Issues.

    Peggy McCardle;Joan Mele-McCarthy;Laurie Cutting;Kathleen Leos

  • White matter microstructural differences linked to left perisylvian language network in children with dyslexia

    Sheryl L. Rimrodt;Daniel J. Peterson;Martha B. Denckla;Martha B. Denckla;Walter E. Kaufmann

  • Construct validity of parent ratings of inhibitory control.

    L. Elizabeth Bodnar;M. Cristine Prahme;Laurie E. Cutting;Martha B. Denckla

  • Oculomotor abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A preliminary study

    Stewart H. Mostofsky;A. G. Lasker;L. E. Cutting;M. B. Denckla

  • Cognitive Profile of Neurofibromatosis Type 1

    Terry M. Levine;April Materek;Jessica Abel;Madeline O’Donnell

  • The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model

    Laurie E. Cutting;Martha Bridge Denckla

  • Effects of Gender and Age on Motor Exam in Typically Developing Children

    Jennifer C. Gidley Larson;Stewart H. Mostofsky;Melissa C. Goldberg;Laurie E. Cutting;Laurie E. Cutting

  • Neuroimaging of Reading Intervention: A Systematic Review and Activation Likelihood Estimate Meta-Analysis

    Laura A. Barquero;Nicole Davis;Laurie E. Cutting

  • Executive function in fluency and recall measures among children with Tourette syndrome or ADHD.

    E. Mark Mahone;Christine W. Koth;Laurie Cutting;Harvey S. Singer

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha B. Denckla
Martha B. Denckla Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Bennett A. Landman
Bennett A. Landman Vanderbilt University
E. Mark Mahone
E. Mark Mahone Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Susan M. Resnick
Susan M. Resnick National Institutes of Health
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Stewart H. Mostofsky
Stewart H. Mostofsky Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
James J. Pekar
James J. Pekar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Yuankai Huo
Yuankai Huo Vanderbilt University
Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of career pathways. Many students choose to become licensed therapists, counselors, or pursue roles in research, healthcare, and education. With the increased availability of online psychology degrees, learners can access flexible, accredited programs designed for working adults or those balancing other commitments.

If your goal is to become a therapist, it's important to understand the state-by-state differences in licensure requirements in the USA. Educational benchmarks, clinical experience, and licensing exams can vary. For example, learn more about Fremont licensed therapist education requirements, or find out how to become a licensed therapist in Fresno. Likewise, you can review the Garland licensed therapist requirements and the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Gilbert.

Whether you are interested in clinical practice, research, or supporting mental health in communities, understanding these pathways and requirements will help you make an informed decision on your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Laurie E. Cutting

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles