World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
8698
World Ranking
8449
National Ranking
4520

Janice M. Keenan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice M. Keenan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janice M. Keenan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice M. Keenan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janice M. Keenan is affiliated with the University of Denver in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as statistics and probability. Additional subfields of study include education, experimental and cognitive psychology, and literature and literary theory.

Their main research topics cover areas such as reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, writing and handwriting education, language, metaphor, and cognition, and discourse analysis in language studies.

The following are the recent papers authored or co-authored by Janice M. Keenan:

  • How Specific Are Learning Disabilities?, 2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • Revolutions in the emergence of discourse processes research, 2024, Discourse Processes

Frequent co-authors include Robin L. Peterson, Lauren M. McGrath, Erik G. Willcutt, Richard K. Olson, and Bruce F. Pennington.

The venues in which Keenan has most often published are the Journal of Learning Disabilities and Discourse Processes.

Best Publications

  • Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension.

    Janice M. Keenan;Rebecca S. Betjemann;Richard K. Olson

  • Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences

    Walter Kintsch;Janice Keenan

  • Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables

    W. Kintsch;E. Kozminsky;W.J. Streby;G. McKoon

  • The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory

    Janice M. Keenan;Susan D. Baillet;Polly Brown

  • Predicting Word Reading and Comprehension with Executive Function and Speed Measures Across Development: A Latent Variable Analysis

    Micaela E. Christopher;Akira Miyake;Janice M. Keenan;Bruce Pennington

  • Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming

    George R Potts;Janice M Keenan;Jonathan M Golding

  • Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation

    Janice M. Keenan;Brian MacWhinney;Deborah Mayhew

  • The Internal and External Validity of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and its Relation with DSM–IV ADHD

    Erik G. Willcutt;Nomita A Chhabildas;Mikaela Kinnear;John C. DeFries

  • How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text.

    Johanna K. Kaakinen;Jukka Hyönä;Janice M. Keenan

  • Imagery in the congenitally blind: How visual are visual images?

    Jerome Zimler;Janice M. Keenan

  • Perspective Effects on Online Text Processing

    Johanna K. Kaakinen;Jukka Hyönä;Janice M. Keenan

  • Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test Without Reading It: Why Comprehension Tests Should Not Include Passage-Independent Items

    Janice M. Keenan;Rebecca S. Betjemann

  • Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension

    Janice M. Keenan;Rebecca S. Betjemann;Sally J. Wadsworth;John C. DeFries

  • Reading comprehension in children with ADHD: cognitive underpinnings of the centrality deficit.

    Amanda C. Miller;Janice M. Keenan;Rebecca S. Betjemann;Erik G. Willcutt

  • Understanding the complex etiologies of developmental disorders: behavioral and molecular genetic approaches.

    Erik G. Willcutt;Bruce F. Pennington;Laramie Duncan;Shelley D. Smith

  • Which elaborative inferences are drawn during reading? A question of methodologies.

    Janice M. Keenan;George R. Potts;Jonathan M. Golding;Tracy M. Jennings

  • Test Differences in Diagnosing Reading Comprehension Deficits

    Janice M. Keenan;Chelsea E. Meenan

  • The self-reference effect with imagery encoding.

    Polly Brown;Janice M. Keenan;George R. Potts

  • Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders

    Asa Elwer;Janice M Keenan;Richard K Olson;Richard K Olson;Brian J Byrne;Brian J Byrne

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocabulary and Reading Development

    Richard K. Olson;Janice M. Keenan;Brian Byrne;Stefan Samuelsson

  • The role of arousal in memory for conversation.

    Brian MacWhinney;Janice M. Keenan;Peter Reinke

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard K. Olson
Richard K. Olson University of Colorado Boulder
Bruce F. Pennington
Bruce F. Pennington University of Denver
Erik G. Willcutt
Erik G. Willcutt University of Colorado Boulder
John C. DeFries
John C. DeFries University of Colorado Boulder
Sally J. Wadsworth
Sally J. Wadsworth University of Colorado Boulder
Brian Byrne
Brian Byrne University of New England
Stefan Samuelsson
Stefan Samuelsson Linköping University
Jukka Hyönä
Jukka Hyönä University of Turku
Jonathan M. Golding
Jonathan M. Golding University of Kentucky
Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, including counseling, marriage and family therapy, and clinical social work. If you're interested in online study, affordability is often a key concern. Luckily, many states offer accessible programs for aspiring professionals.

For example, if you are considering a move to Florida or plan to study remotely, you may want to explore the affordable counseling programs in Florida. Students based in Georgia or looking for budget-friendly options can check out the cheapest counseling programs in Georgia.

The Midwest also offers excellent opportunities. You can review the cheapest counseling degrees in Illinois and the cheapest counseling degrees in Indiana.

Choosing an online psychology or counseling degree can help you save on costs, gain flexibility, and quickly enter in-demand careers. Assessing affordable regional programs is the first step to a rewarding professional journey in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Janice M. Keenan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles