World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10897 10196 5699 5202 139 4507

Jonathan M. Golding publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan M. Golding between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan M. Golding published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2022. 15 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2022. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 48 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1984 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan M. Golding: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 0
1990 5
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 5
1995 4
1996 6
1997 4
1998 1
1999 5
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 9
2013 14
2014 3
2015 4
2016 3
2017 5
2018 4
2019 2
2020 7
2021 9
2022 48
2023 5
2024 6
2025 9
Total 195
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Golding publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Golding sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Golding D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Golding sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan M. Golding is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research spans social sciences and psychology, with a primary focus on topics including sexual assault and victimization studies, jury decision-making processes, deception detection and forensic psychology, criminal justice and corrections analysis, law in society and culture, crime patterns and interventions, and child abuse and trauma.

Golding has contributed to numerous publications, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches across sociology, law, gender studies, social psychology, and clinical psychology. The breadth of their work is reflected in the significant number of publications within these subfields.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Psychology students' motivation and learning in response to the shift to remote instruction during COVID-19, 2021, published in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
  • When Opportunity Knocks: College Students' Cheating Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2022, published in Teaching of Psychology
  • Perceptions of plea bargaining in cases of elder financial abuse, 2020, published in Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
  • Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions, 2024, published in Teaching of Psychology
  • The Perception of a Jailhouse Informant in a Sexual Assault Case, 2020, published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Frequent collaborators include Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Andrea M. Pals, Mary M. Levi, Alexis M. Le Grand, and Anne Lippert, indicating ongoing partnerships in producing research across multiple areas.

Golding's work appears regularly in specific publication venues:

  • Violence Against Women
  • Psychology Crime and Law
  • Teaching of Psychology
  • Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
  • New York University Press eBooks

They have also contributed to book publications, particularly under New York University Press eBooks and NYU Press eBooks, with titles such as Jailhouse Informants, published in 2022.

Their research contributions integrate key themes in forensic psychology and criminal justice, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement with social sciences and law. Topics like jury decision processes, victimization studies, and deception detection highlight their focus within social and clinical psychology while also exploring broad societal and cultural implications of law.

Best Publications

  • Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming

    George R Potts;Janice M Keenan;Jonathan M Golding

  • Intentional Forgetting : Interdisciplinary Approaches

    Jonathan M. Golding;Colin M. MacLeod

  • Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.

    Brian H. Bornstein;Jonathan M. Golding;Jeffrey Neuschatz;Christopher Kimbrough

  • When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.

    Gail S. Goodman;Jonathan M. Golding;Vicki S. Helgeson;Marshall M. Haith

  • Jurors' Reactions to Child Witnesses

    Gail S. Goodman;Jonathan M. Golding;Marshall M. Haith

  • Which elaborative inferences are drawn during reading? A question of methodologies.

    Janice M. Keenan;George R. Potts;Jonathan M. Golding;Tracy M. Jennings

  • Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial

    Jonathan M Golding;Heather M Fryman;Dorothy F Marsil;John A Yozwiak

  • Adaptive forgetting in animals

    Philipp J. Kraemer;Jonathan M. Golding

  • Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension?

    Debra L. Long;Jonathan M. Golding

  • A Review of Factors Affecting Jurors’ Decisions in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

    Bette L. Bottoms;Jonathan M. Golding;Maggie C. Stevenson;Tisha R. A. Wiley

  • A test of the on-line status of goal-related inferences

    Debra L Long;Jonathan M Golding;Arthur C Graesser

  • Methodological Issues In Evaluating The Occurrence of Inferences

    Janice M. Keenan;Jonathan M. Golding;George R. Potts;Tracy M. Jennings

  • Causal connectives increase inference generation

    Keith K. Millis;Jonathan M. Golding;Gregory Barker

  • The believability of repressed memories

    Jonathan M. Golding;Sandra A. Sego;Rebecca Polley Sanchez;Dawn Hasemann

  • Who Bought the Drinks? Juror Perceptions of Intoxication in a Rape Trial

    Kellie Rose Lynch;Nesa E. Wasarhaley;Jonathan M. Golding;Theresa Simcic

  • Directed Forgetting in Older Adults Using the Item and List Methods

    Sandra A. Sego;Jonathan M. Golding;Lawrence R. Gottlob

  • You Can′t Always Forget What You Want: Directed Forgetting of Related Words

    J.M. Golding;D.L. Long;C.M. Macleod

  • The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial.

    Jonathan M. Golding;Terri L. Stewart;John A. Yozwiak;Yas Djadali

  • The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.

    Jonathan M. Golding;Gregory S. Bradshaw;Emily E. Dunlap;Emily C. Hodell

  • Jurors' Perceptions of Children's Eyewitness Testimony*

    Gail S. Goodman;Jonathan M. Golding;Marshall M. Haith;Joseph Michelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin MacLeod
Colin MacLeod University of Western Australia
Janice M. Keenan
Janice M. Keenan University of Denver
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Brian H. Bornstein
Brian H. Bornstein Arizona State University
Marshall M. Haith
Marshall M. Haith University of Denver
Gail S. Goodman
Gail S. Goodman University of California, Davis
Bette L. Bottoms
Bette L. Bottoms University of Illinois at Chicago
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Christia Spears Brown
Christia Spears Brown University of Kentucky
Vicki S. Helgeson
Vicki S. Helgeson Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees can open doors to diverse career paths beyond traditional counseling roles. One in-demand option is substance abuse counseling, where professionals help individuals recover from addiction and improve their mental health.

Requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor vary widely based on location. For example, Omaha substance abuse counselor certification requirements may differ from substance abuse counselor requirements in Orlando. Local regulations often dictate the necessary education, certification, and supervised experience for entry into the field.

Aspiring counselors should research the criteria in their chosen city. Steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Philadelphia or meeting the Phoenix substance abuse counselor certification requirements may include earning a specialized degree, completing specific training hours, and passing state exams.

By choosing related online degree programs, students can position themselves for rewarding careers in mental health, substance abuse counseling, or other psychology-related fields—all while accommodating their own schedules and location needs.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Golding

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles