World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
84
Citations
29310
World Ranking
870
National Ranking
459

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
29959
World Ranking
14502
National Ranking
7335

Eric J. Stanbridge publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric J. Stanbridge sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 307 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Eric J. Stanbridge D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric J. Stanbridge sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Eric J. Stanbridge is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research activities concentrate on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on molecular biology and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their recent published work predominantly explores mechanisms involved in cancer biology, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways and the processes underlying cancer metastasis. Advanced breast cancer therapies also feature prominently in their research topics.

Key topics of their research include:

  • PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Mechanisms of cancer metastasis
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Stanbridge has contributed to several publications in the venue UNC Libraries. Notable papers include:

  • Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase in the Aggressive Tumor Growth of HT1080 Human Fibrosarcoma Cells, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Loss of oncogenic ras expression does not correlate with loss of tumorigenicity in human cells., 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Dissection of Ras-Dependent Signaling Pathways Controlling Aggressive Tumor Growth of Human Fibrosarcoma Cells: Evidence for a Potential Novel Pathway, 2020, UNC Libraries

Their collaboration network includes the following frequent coauthors:

  • S. Gupta
  • R. Plattner
  • C. J. Der
  • S. Stuffrein
  • M. Tencati

Eric J. Stanbridge was recognized with the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1993.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of Cell Death Protease Caspase-9 by Phosphorylation

    Michael H. Cardone;Natalie Roy;Henning R. Stennicke;Guy S. Salvesen

  • Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Cell-Surface Transmembrane Carbonic Anhydrases in Human Cancer

    Sergey Ivanov;Shu-Yuan Liao;Alla Ivanova;Alla Danilkovitch-Miagkova

  • Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: Implications for prognosis and therapy

    Matthew H.T. Bui;David Seligson;Ken ryu Han;Allan J. Pantuck

  • Chromosomal translocation t(1;19) results in synthesis of a homeobox fusion mRNA that codes for a potential chimeric transcription factor

    Jamison Nourse;Julia D. Mellentin;Naomi Galili;Joyce Wilkinson

  • Carbonic Anhydrase IX Is an Independent Predictor of Survival in Advanced Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

    Matthew H. T. Bui;David Seligson;Ken-ryu Han;Allan J. Pantuck

  • Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression Predicts Outcome of Interleukin 2 Therapy for Renal Cancer

    Michael Atkins;Meredith Regan;David McDermott;James Mier

  • Introduction of a normal human chromosome 11 into a Wilms' tumor cell line controls its tumorigenic expression.

    Bernard E. Weissman;Paul J. Saxon;Steve R. Pasquale;Gary R. Jones

  • Incorporation of 3H-uridine and 3H-uracil into RNA: a simple technique for the detection of mycoplasma contamination of cultured cells.

    E.L. Schneider;E.L. Schneider;E.J. Stanbridge;E.J. Stanbridge;C.J. Epstein;C.J. Epstein

  • Human MN/CA9 gene, a novel member of the carbonic anhydrase family: Structure and exon to protein domain relationships

    René Opavský;Silvia Pastoreková;Vladimír Zelník;Adriana Gibadulinová

  • Down-regulation of transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in renal cell carcinoma cell lines by wild-type von Hippel-Lindau transgenes

    Sergey V. Ivanov;Igor Kuzmin;Ming Hui Wei;Svetlana Pack

  • Human cell hybrids: analysis of transformation and tumorigenicity

    Eric J. Stanbridge;Channing J Der;Claus Jens Doersen;Robyn Y. Nishimi

  • Suppression of malignancy in human cells.

    Eric J. Stanbridge

  • The candidate tumor suppressor gene, RASSF1A, from human chromosome 3p21.3 is involved in kidney tumorigenesis

    Koen Dreijerink;Eleonora Braga;Igor Kuzmin;Laura Geil

  • Tumorigenicity in human melanoma cell lines controlled by introduction of human chromosome 6.

    Jeffrey M. Trent;Eric J. Stanbridge;Heyoung L. McBride;Eckart U. Meese

  • Introduction of human chromosome 11 via microcell transfer controls tumorigenic expression of HeLa cells.

    P J Saxon;E S Srivatsan;E J Stanbridge

  • Human tumor suppressor genes

    Eric J. Stanbridge

  • Cancer Stem Cells Contribute to Cisplatin Resistance in Brca1/p53–Mediated Mouse Mammary Tumors

    Norazizah Shafee;Christopher R. Smith;Shuanzeng Wei;Yoon Kim

  • Identification of the MN/CA9 Protein as a Reliable Diagnostic Biomarker of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney

    S.-Y. Liao;O.N. Aurelio;K. Jan;J. Zavada

  • Progression of colorectal cancer is associated with multiple tumor suppressor gene defects but inhibition of tumorigenicity is accomplished by correction of any single defect via chromosome transfer.

    Michele C. Goyette;Kathleen Cho;Clare L. Fasching;Daniel B. Levy

  • Specific chromosome loss associated with the expression of tumorigenicity in human cell hybrids

    Eric J. Stanbridge;Robert R. Flandermeyer;David W. Daniels;Walter A. Nelson-Rees

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene R. Zabarovsky
Eugene R. Zabarovsky Karolinska Institute
Sai Wah Tsao
Sai Wah Tsao University of Hong Kong
Michael I. Lerman
Michael I. Lerman National Institutes of Health
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Edward L. Schneider
Edward L. Schneider University of Southern California
Channing J. Der
Channing J. Der University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Simon Law
Simon Law University of Hong Kong
Bernard E. Weissman
Bernard E. Weissman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven F. Dowdy
Steven F. Dowdy University of California, San Diego
Leonard Hayflick
Leonard Hayflick University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your options beyond Molecular Biology, there are several online pathways to consider. Many students choose programs from a non profit university for their strong academic standards and reputable degrees.

Those with military backgrounds can benefit from flexible options offered by military friendly online schools. These institutions understand the unique needs of veterans, active-duty service members, and their families.

Choosing a related field such as healthcare or mental health can open new career directions. For example, msw online programs prepare graduates for social work roles in various settings, while a masters in psychology online can accelerate your entry into psychology or counseling careers.

Exploring these online degree options lets you tailor your educational journey, align it with your interests, and widen your career prospects in science, health, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Eric J. Stanbridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles