What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- DNA
His scientific interests lie mostly in Molecular biology, DNA damage, Cell culture, DNA and Biochemistry.
His work carried out in the field of Molecular biology brings together such families of science as Cell growth and RNA, Gene, Antiviral gene, Complementary DNA.
His studies in DNA damage integrate themes in fields like Sister chromatid exchange, Ethyl methanesulfonate, Lymphocyte, DNA repair and Gel electrophoresis.
His DNA repair research is multidisciplinary, relying on both DNA Repair Kinetics, Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase and Comet assay.
His Cell culture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cell, Immunology, Andrology, WI-38 and Fetus.
His Chromatin and Methylnitronitrosoguanidine study in the realm of Biochemistry connects with subjects such as Fowl and 4-Nitroquinoline 1-oxide.
His most cited work include:
- A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells (8671 citations)
- Handbook of the Biology of Aging (1231 citations)
- The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. (603 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Molecular biology, Cell culture, In vitro, Cell and Gerontology.
The concepts of his Molecular biology study are interwoven with issues in DNA, DNA damage, RNA, Sister chromatids and Cell cycle.
His DNA damage research includes elements of Sister chromatid exchange, Lymphocyte, Gel electrophoresis and DNA repair.
His work on Mycoplasma contamination as part of general Cell culture study is frequently linked to Cellular Aging, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His studies deal with areas such as Senescence, Cell division, Immunology and In vivo as well as In vitro.
His Cell research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Pathology, Leukodystrophy and Cell biology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Molecular biology (30.38%)
- Cell culture (19.62%)
- In vitro (16.46%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1987-2018)?
- Gerontology (13.92%)
- Molecular biology (30.38%)
- DNA damage (12.03%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Gerontology, Molecular biology, DNA damage, Gene and DNA.
His Gerontology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Developed country, Nursing homes, Health care and Psychosocial.
His Molecular biology study combines topics in areas such as Chromatin, Cell, Sperm and DNA repair.
His DNA damage study is associated with Biochemistry.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Mutagenesis and Pathology in addition to DNA.
The various areas that he examines in his Messenger RNA study include RNA, Andrology and Gene expression.
Between 1987 and 2018, his most popular works were:
- A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells (8671 citations)
- Handbook of the Biology of Aging (1231 citations)
- The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. (603 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- DNA
His primary areas of investigation include Molecular biology, DNA damage, Gel electrophoresis, DNA and DNA repair.
His work deals with themes such as Complementary DNA, Gene and Cell growth, which intersect with Molecular biology.
His DNA damage research is within the category of Biochemistry.
His work is connected to DNA Repair Kinetics, Radiation Induced DNA Damage, Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase and Comet assay, as a part of Biochemistry.
Edward L. Schneider has included themes like Mutagenesis and Nucleic acid in his DNA study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cell and In vitro.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
