World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Günter Speit

Günter Speit

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
64
Citations
14411
World Ranking
1744
National Ranking
121

Günter Speit publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Speit sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 195 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Günter Speit D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Speit sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Günter Speit is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. Their academic profile does not currently include recent papers, co-authors, or a record of frequent publication venues. There is also no available data related to book publications or specific fields and subfields of study.

The absence of listed recent papers means there is no detailed information on specific research topics, publication years, or venues associated with their work. Similarly, no co-authors or collaboration networks are documented, which limits insight into professional partnerships.

Without data on main fields or subfields of study, as well as main research topics, it is not possible to specify the scientific focus areas that characterize Günter Speit's research activities. Additionally, there are no awards or honors recorded that could indicate recognition by the academic community.

The current information suggests a profile limited to the institutional affiliation at the University of Ulm, with no further publicly available bibliometric or research output details at this time.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay

    A. Hartmann;E. Agurell;C. Beevers;S. Brendler-Schwaab

  • Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

    Brian Burlinson;Raymond R. Tice;Günter Speit;Eva Agurell

  • The contribution of cytotoxicity to DNA-effects in the single cell gel test (comet assay)

    Andreas Hartmann;Günter Speit

  • Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo

    David Kirkland;Günter Speit

  • The Comet Assay(Single-Cell Gel Test), A Sensitive Genotoxicity Test for the Detection of DNA Damage and Repair

    Günter Speit;Andreas Hartmann

  • The in vivo comet assay: use and status in genotoxicity testing.

    Susanne Brendler-Schwaab;Andreas Hartmann;Stefan Pfuhler;Günter Speit

  • Detection of crosslinks with the comet assay in relationship to genotoxicity and cytotoxicity

    Oliver Merk;Günter Speit

  • Induced Micronucleus Frequencies in Peripheral Lymphocytes as a Screening Test for Carriers of a BRCA1 Mutation in Breast Cancer Families

    Andreas Rothfuss;Petra Schütz;Sylvia Bochum;Tanja Volm

  • The comet assay: a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage and repair.

    Günter Speit;Andreas Rothfuss

  • Significance of formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein crosslinks for mutagenesis.

    Oliver Merk;Günter Speit

  • The contribution of excision repair to the DNA effects seen in the alkaline single cell gel test (comet assay)

    Günter Speit;Andreas Hartmann

  • Sensitivity of the FPG protein towards alkylation damage in the comet assay.

    Günter Speit;Petra Schütz;Irina Bonzheim;Kristina Trenz

  • Comparative investigations of the genotoxic effects of metals in the single cell gel (SCG) assay and the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test

    Andreas Hartmann;Günter Speit

  • Antimutagenic effect of Agaricus blazei Murrill mushroom on the genotoxicity induced by cyclophosphamide.

    Roberta Denadai Delmanto;Patrı́cia Lepage Alves de Lima;Marina Mariko Sugui;Augusto Ferreira da Eira

  • Antimutagenic effects of the mushroom Agaricus blazei Murrill extracts on V79 cells

    Regina Carla Rodrigues Notoya Menoli;Mário Sérgio Mantovani;Lúcia Regina Ribeiro;Günter Speit

  • An alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay for environmental biomonitoring with native rodents

    Juliana da Silva;Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas;Jorge Reppold Marinho;Günter Speit

  • Genotoxic effects of chemicals in the single cell gel (SCG) test with human blood cells in relation to the induction of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE)

    Andreas Hartmann;Günter Speit

  • On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of bromodeoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes. II. Differences between the demonstration of sister chromatid differentiation and replication patterns.

    Günter Speit;Sabine Haupter

  • Investigations on the effect of cigarette smoking in the comet assay.

    Günter Speit;Thomas Witton-Davies;Worapa Heepchantree;Kristina Trenz

  • The comet assay: a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage.

    Günter Speit;Andreas Hartmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Walther Vogel
Walther Vogel University of Ulm
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo
David Kirkland
David Kirkland Covance (United States)
Csaba Szabó
Csaba Szabó University of Fribourg
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Alok Dhawan
Alok Dhawan Indian Institute of Toxicology Research
James M. Parry
James M. Parry Swansea University
Raymond R. Tice
Raymond R. Tice National Institutes of Health
Christian Kubisch
Christian Kubisch Universität Hamburg
George M. Martin
George M. Martin University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to diverse career and academic options. Many students interested in life sciences also consider fields such as psychology and counseling, which often overlap with biology through subjects like neurobiology, genetics, and behavioral health.

If you're drawn to the human mind and therapeutic practice, earning a master of mental health online can lead to impactful roles in clinical settings. For those interested in legal systems and criminal behavior, you might ask, what can I do with a masters in forensic psychology? This specialization connects molecular insights to forensic investigations.

Child development is another promising pathway. An online child psychology degree prepares graduates to support youth in educational, clinical, or research settings—often complementing work in developmental biology.

Affordability is key for many students. Numerous institutions now offer affordable masters in counseling programs, making advanced education in allied disciplines more accessible without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Speit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles