World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
9084
World Ranking
17639
National Ranking
7238

David Kirkland publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Kirkland sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 136 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David Kirkland D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Kirkland sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Kirkland is affiliated with Covance in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research primarily focuses on carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, covering a range of related topics including animal testing and alternatives, molecular biology techniques and applications, pesticide exposure and toxicity, genetically modified organisms research, nanoparticles synthesis and applications, as well as the effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

The scientist has published significant work in well-known venues. The most frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Motivation and Emotion

Notable recent papers by David Kirkland include:

  • Use of in vitro 3D tissue models in genotoxicity testing: Strategic fit, validation status and way forward. Report of the working group from the 7th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), 2020, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • A weight of evidence review of the genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO2), 2022, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database, 2020, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine based on existing and new data, with relevance to safety of lidocaine exposure, 2020, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Interlaboratory validation of the ToxTracker assay: An in vitro reporter assay for mechanistic genotoxicity assessment, 2024, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Kirkland include:

  • Stefan Pfuhler
  • Jan van Benthem
  • Raffaella Corvi
  • Andreas Zeller
  • Carol Beevers

Their research spans several subfields of study such as cancer research, molecular biology, plant science, small animals, and materials chemistry. The work predominantly addresses the mechanisms and safety evaluations within genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, reflecting a broad and interdisciplinary approach to biochemical and genetic toxicology.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity

    David Kirkland;Marilyn Aardema;Leigh Henderson;Lutz Müller

  • How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.

    David Kirkland;Stefan Pfuhler;David Tweats;Marilyn Aardema

  • Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo

    David Kirkland;Günter Speit

  • A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.

    David Kirkland;Lesley Reeve;David Gatehouse;Philippe Vanparys

  • Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type.

    Paul Fowler;Katie Smith;Jamie Young;Laura Jeffrey

  • Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop.

    David Kirkland;Peter Kasper;Lutz Müller;Raffaella Corvi

  • Clastogenicity, photo-clastogenicity or pseudo-photo-clastogenicity: Genotoxic effects of zinc oxide in the dark, in pre-irradiated or simultaneously irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells.

    Eric K. Dufour;Tirukalikundram Kumaravel;Gerhard J. Nohynek;David Kirkland

  • Report from working group on in vitro tests for chromosomal aberrations.

    Sheila M. Galloway;Marilyn J. Aardema;Motoi Ishidate;James L. Ivett

  • Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.

    David Kirkland;Peter Kasper;Hans Jörg Martus;Lutz Müller

  • Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.

    David Kirkland;Marilyn Aardema;Lutz Müller;Hayashi Makoto

  • Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results: the importance of thresholds.

    David J Kirkland;Lutz Müller

  • Assessment of the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks of p-nitrophenol when it is present as an impurity in a drug product

    G. Eichenbaum;M. Johnson;D. Kirkland;P. O’Neill

  • Review of genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and glyphosate-based formulations

    Larry D. Kier;David J. Kirkland

  • Comparison of different methods for an accurate assessment of cytotoxicity in the in vitro micronucleus test: I. Theoretical aspects

    E. Lorge;M. Hayashi;S. Albertini;D. Kirkland

  • Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing

    V. Thybaud;M. Aardema;J. Clements;K. Dearfield

  • An assessment of the genotoxicity and human health risk of topical use of kojic acid [5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-4H-pyran-4-one]

    Gerhard J. Nohynek;David Kirkland;Daniel Marzin;Herve Toutain

  • In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results

    D. J. Kirkland;M. Aardema;N. Banduhn;P. Carmichael

  • A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment

    Gary M. Williams;Marilyn Aardema;John Acquavella;Sir Colin Berry

  • Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.

    D.J. Kirkland;L. Henderson;D. Marzin;L. Müller

  • Reduction of misleading (“false”) positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. II. Importance of accurate toxicity measurement

    Paul Fowler;Paul Fowler;Robert Smith;Katie Smith;Jamie Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Marilyn J. Aardema
Marilyn J. Aardema Procter & Gamble (United States)
James T. MacGregor
James T. MacGregor United States Food and Drug Administration
Gary M. Williams
Gary M. Williams New York Medical College
Stephen D. Dertinger
Stephen D. Dertinger University of Rochester
Günter Speit
Günter Speit University of Ulm
Errol Zeiger
Errol Zeiger National Institutes of Health
Toshio Sofuni
Toshio Sofuni National Institutes of Health
Makoto Hayashi
Makoto Hayashi makoto international consulting
James M. Parry
James M. Parry Swansea University
Alan R. Boobis
Alan R. Boobis Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David Kirkland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles