World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15079 14194 7612 7046 450 26259

Gary M. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary M. Williams between 1966 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary M. Williams published across 61 years, from 1966 to 2026, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1996. 7 of the 487 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1996. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 18 publications 1981: 21 publications 1982: 15 publications 1983: 22 publications 1984: 23 publications 1985: 16 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 26 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 2 publications
1966 2026

487 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary M. Williams: publications per year, 1966 to 2026
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 2
1972 3
1973 4
1974 3
1975 2
1976 5
1977 7
1978 9
1979 9
1980 18
1981 21
1982 15
1983 22
1984 23
1985 16
1986 10
1987 15
1988 13
1989 7
1990 10
1991 5
1992 9
1993 12
1994 10
1995 8
1996 26
1997 11
1998 21
1999 9
2000 14
2001 11
2002 9
2003 3
2004 7
2005 8
2006 8
2007 10
2008 10
2009 6
2010 5
2011 4
2012 2
2013 5
2014 6
2015 3
2016 11
2017 5
2018 6
2019 5
2020 2
2021 2
2022 5
2023 3
2024 4
2025 5
2026 2
Total 487
Download as CSV

Gary M. Williams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 450
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary M. Williams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For experimental and theoretical demonstrations of the role of quantized vorticity in superfluid phase transitions in two and three dimensions

Overview

Gary M. Williams is affiliated with New York Medical College in the United States and has made contributions across multiple disciplines within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, agricultural and biological sciences, and environmental science. Their published research spans a strong focus on carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, along with topics related to pesticide exposure, endocrine disrupting chemicals, and genomics.

The scientist's work frequently appears in journals such as Food and Chemical Toxicology, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Mutagenesis, Foods, and Land. Notable recent publications include:

  • The BlueScreen HC assay to predict the genotoxic potential of fragrance materials, 2022, Mutagenesis
  • Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk, 2022, Foods
  • Re-Imagining Wild Rivers in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2022, Land
  • A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxic potential of 4-methylimidazole as a possible mode of action for the formation of lung tumors in exposed mice, 2020, Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Acrylonitrile induction of rodent neoplasia: Potential mechanism of action and relevance to humans, 2022, Toxicology Research and Application

The primary fields of study for Williams cover biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology with 19 publications, followed by agricultural and biological sciences with 9, and environmental science with 8. Subfields include cancer research, plant science, health toxicology and mutagenesis, molecular biology, and small animals.

Key research topics embedded in Williams's work are:

  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research

Frequent collaborators in Williams's research include Tetyana Kobets, Yax Thakkar, Benjamin Smith, A.M. Api, and Jian-Dong Duan. The collaboration with Tetyana Kobets is notably extensive, reflecting a shared focus in related toxicological and carcinogenic risk studies.

Williams received recognition as a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2003 for contributions toward understanding quantized vorticity in superfluid phase transitions, indicative of a broader scientific engagement beyond their primary biological and toxicological research interests.

Best Publications

  • Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of the Herbicide Roundup and Its Active Ingredient, Glyphosate, for Humans

    Gary M. Williams;Robert Kroes;Ian C. Munro

  • A critical review of the data related to the safety of quercetin and lack of evidence of in vivo toxicity, including lack of genotoxic/carcinogenic properties.

    M. Harwood;B. Danielewska-Nikiel;J.F. Borzelleca;G.W. Flamm

  • Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework

    Edward J. Calabrese;Kenneth A. Bachmann;A. John Bailer;P. Michael Bolger

  • Detection of chemical carcinogens by unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat liver primary cell cultures.

    Gary M. Williams

  • N-nitrosodiethylamine mechanistic data and risk assessment: bioactivation, DNA-adduct formation, mutagenicity, and tumor initiation.

    Lynne Verna;John Whysner;Gary M. Williams

  • Safety assessment of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene as antioxidant food additives.

    G.M Williams;M.J Iatropoulos;J Whysner

  • Aspartame: A Safety Evaluation Based on Current Use Levels, Regulations, and Toxicological and Epidemiological Studies

    B. A. Magnuson;G. A. Burdock;J. Doull;R. M. Kroes

  • A Cancer Risk Assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: Application of the New U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Guidelines

    John Doull;Russell Cattley;Cliff Elcombe;Brian G. Lake

  • Major Difference in the Hepatocarcinogenicity and DNA Adduct Forming Ability between Toremifene and Tamoxifen in Female Crl:CD(BR) Rats

    Gordon C. Hard;Michael J. Iatropoulos;Kevin Jordan;Leila Radi

  • Rat hepatocyte primary cell cultures. III. Improved dissociation and attachment techniques and the enhancement of survival by culture medium.

    Gary M. Williams;Edilberto Bermudez;Dominick Scaramuzzino

  • The pathogenesis of rat liver cancer caused by chemical carcinogens.

    Gary M. Williams

  • Carcinogen Testing: Current Problems and New Approaches

    John H. Weisburger;Gary M. Williams

  • Conditions affecting primary cell cultures of functional adult rat hepatocytes. II. Dexamethasone enhanced longevity and maintenance of morphology.

    Brian A. Laishes;Gary M. Williams

  • Reliability of the hepatocyte primary culture/DNA repair test in testing of coded carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

    G.M. Williams;G.M. Williams;M.F. Laspia;V.C. Dunkel

  • Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic

    Diane Benford;P. Michael Bolger;Philip Carthew;Myriam Coulet

  • Phenobarbital mechanistic data and risk assessment: enzyme induction, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion.

    John Whysner;Peter M. Ross;Gary M. Williams

  • Isolation and long-term cell culture of epithelial-like cells from rat liver.

    G.M. Williams;Elizabeth K. Weisburger;J.H. Weisburger

  • Carcinogen-induced DNA repair in primary rat liver cell cultures; a possible screen for chemical carcinogens.

    Gary M. Williams

  • CONDITIONS AFFECTING PRIMARY CELL CULTURES OF FUNCTIONAL ADULT RAT HEPATOCYTES. 1. THE EFFECT OF INSULIN

    Brian A. Laishes;Gary M. Williams

  • Alteration of Liver Cell Function and Proliferation: Differentiation Between Adaptation and Toxicity

    Gary M. Williams;Michael J. Iatropoulos

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Weisburger
John H. Weisburger Dana Corporation
Hideki Mori
Hideki Mori Gifu University
Takuji Tanaka
Takuji Tanaka Gifu University
David Kirkland
David Kirkland Covance (United States)
James A. Swenberg
James A. Swenberg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz New York Medical College
Frank Traganos
Frank Traganos New York Medical College
Daniel A. Casciano
Daniel A. Casciano University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Stefan Karlsson
Stefan Karlsson Lund University
Stephen S. Hecht
Stephen S. Hecht University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a future in medicine or healthcare, there are several online degrees and career pathways to consider. For those passionate about preventative medicine and healthy living, online degrees in nutrition offer flexible learning and open doors to careers in wellness, research, and health education.

Interested in healthcare administration? The best mha programs online provide a pathway to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and health systems. These programs are designed for busy professionals seeking to advance their careers without putting their lives on hold.

For nurses aiming to boost their credentials, the rn to bsn without clinicals option allows registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing entirely online, streamlining the process for working adults.

Those seeking the highest level of nursing practice can consider the shortest dnp program online, which enables RNs and advanced practice nurses to complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice efficiently.

Exploring these online pathways can help you map out the next steps in your healthcare career, all while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Gary M. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles