World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8330 7781 385 378 146 5273

Ulrike Lueken publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrike Lueken between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrike Lueken published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2024. 46 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2024. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 23 publications
2006 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrike Lueken: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 0
2011 10
2012 9
2013 7
2014 17
2015 10
2016 10
2017 12
2018 5
2019 9
2020 14
2021 15
2022 14
2023 17
2024 23
2025 23
Total 207
Download as CSV

Ulrike Lueken publications per year - data summary

  • Ulrike Lueken, a Psychology scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, has 207 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2024 and 2025, with 23 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2006, with 2 publications.
  • 1 of the 20 years in the span carries no publications at all (2010).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.9 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 92 publications, 44% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 31 publications (4.4 per year); 2013-2019: 70 publications (10.0 per year); 2020-2025: 106 publications (17.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ulrike Lueken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Lueken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 146
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrike Lueken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Ulrike Lueken, a Psychology scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, records 146 publications - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ulrike Lueken, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Ulrike Lueken ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ulrike Lueken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Lueken sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Ulrike Lueken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Ulrike Lueken, a Psychology scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, records 40 D-Index - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ulrike Lueken, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Ulrike Lueken ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ulrike Lueken is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on both experimental and clinical psychology. They have contributed extensively to subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics of Ulrike Lueken's work include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additionally, they explore mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, functional brain connectivity studies, the impact of COVID-19 on mental health, digital mental health interventions, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Their publication record features frequent contributions to several notable venues, such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Depression and Anxiety
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Psychologische Rundschau
  • Neuroscience Applied

Recent scholarly articles by Ulrike Lueken include the following:

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Die COVID-19-Pandemie als Herausforderung für die psychische Gesundheit, 2020, Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
  • Personalization strategies in digital mental health interventions: a systematic review and conceptual framework for depressive symptoms, 2023, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Mega-analysis methods in ENIGMA: The experience of the generalized anxiety disorder working group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Change of Threat Expectancy as Mechanism of Exposure-Based Psychotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: Evidence From 8,484 Exposure Exercises of 605 Patients, 2022, Clinical Psychological Science

Ulrike Lueken has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Kevin Hilbert
  • Udo Dannlowski
  • Elisabeth J. Leehr
  • Katharina Domschke
  • Joscha Böhnlein

Best Publications

  • Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on neural correlates of fear conditioning in panic disorder.

    Tilo Kircher;Volker Arolt;Andreas Jansen;Martin Pyka

  • Avoidance, safety behavior, and reassurance seeking in generalized anxiety disorder.

    Katja Beesdo-Baum;Elsa Jenjahn;Michael Höfler;Ulrike Lueken

  • Neural structures, functioning and connectivity in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and interaction with neuroendocrine systems: a systematic review.

    Kevin Hilbert;Ulrike Lueken;Katja Beesdo-Baum

  • Predicting treatment response to cognitive behavioral therapy in panic disorder with agoraphobia by integrating local neural information.

    Tim Hahn;Tilo Kircher;Benjamin Straube;Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

  • Neural Substrates of Treatment Response to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia

    Ulrike Lueken;Benjamin Straube;Carsten Konrad;Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

  • Neurobiological markers predicting treatment response in anxiety disorders: A systematic review and implications for clinical application.

    Ulrike Lueken;Kathrin C. Zierhut;Tim Hahn;Benjamin Straube

  • The scanner as a stressor: evidence from subjective and neuroendocrine stress parameters in the time course of a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.

    Markus Muehlhan;Ulrike Lueken;Hans-Ulrich Wittchen;Clemens Kirschbaum

  • MAOA and mechanisms of panic disorder revisited: from bench to molecular psychotherapy

    Andreas Reif;Jan Richter;Benjamin Straube;Michael Höfler

  • Handedness, dichotic-listening ear advantage, and gender effects on planum temporale asymmetry—A volumetric investigation using structural magnetic resonance imaging

    Sarah Dos Santos Sequeira;Wolfgang Woerner;Christof Walter;Frank Kreuder

  • How specific is specific phobia? Different neural response patterns in two subtypes of specific phobia.

    Ulrike Lueken;Johann Daniel Kruschwitz;Markus Muehlhan;Jens Siegert

  • Personalization strategies in digital mental health interventions: a systematic review and conceptual framework for depressive symptoms

    Unknown

  • Hair cortisol concentrations and cortisol stress reactivity in generalized anxiety disorder, major depression and their comorbidity.

    Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen;Susann Wichmann;Tobias Stalder;Tobias Stalder;Kevin Hilbert

  • Die Apathy Evaluation Scale: Erste Ergebnisse zu den psychometrischen Eigenschaften einer deutschsprachigen Übersetzung der Skala.

    U. Lueken;U. Seidl;M. Schwarz;L. Völker

  • Development of a Short Version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale Specifically Adapted for Demented Nursing Home Residents

    Unknown

  • Die COVID-19-Pandemie als Herausforderung für die psychische Gesundheit

    Eva-Lotta Brakemeier;Eva-Lotta Brakemeier;Janine Wirkner;Christine Knaevelsrud;Susanne Wurm

  • Autobiographical memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease.

    Ulrich Seidl;Ulrike Lueken;Philipp A. Thomann;Josef Geider

  • Gray and white matter volume abnormalities in generalized anxiety disorder by categorical and dimensional characterization.

    Kevin Hilbert;Daniel S. Pine;Markus Muehlhan;Ulrike Lueken

  • Altered top-down and bottom-up processing of fear conditioning in panic disorder with agoraphobia.

    U. Lueken;B. Straube;I. Reinhardt;N. I. Maslowski

  • Separating generalized anxiety disorder from major depression using clinical, hormonal, and structural MRI data: A multimodal machine learning study.

    Kevin Hilbert;Ulrike Lueken;Markus Muehlhan;Katja Beesdo-Baum

  • Allelic variation in CRHR1 predisposes to panic disorder : evidence for biased fear processing

    Heike Weber;Heike Weber;Jan Richter;Benjamin Straube;Ulrike Lueken;Ulrike Lueken

  • Translational machine learning for psychiatric neuroimaging.

    Martin Walter;Sarah Alizadeh;Hamidreza Jamalabadi;Ulrike Lueken

Frequent Co-Authors

Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Andreas Ströhle
Andreas Ströhle Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benjamin Straube
Benjamin Straube Philipp University of Marburg
Bettina Pfleiderer
Bettina Pfleiderer University of Münster
Volker Arolt
Volker Arolt University of Münster
Alexander L. Gerlach
Alexander L. Gerlach University of Cologne
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Alfons O. Hamm
Alfons O. Hamm University of Greifswald
Jürgen Deckert
Jürgen Deckert University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of professional paths, including counseling and therapy roles. Many students pursue specialized tracks such as Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), which often require distinct education and licensing steps depending on location.

For example, Denver mft education requirements emphasize both accredited graduate programs and state-approved clinical experience. Similarly, understanding how to become an mft in Detroit includes knowledge about Michigan-specific licensure processes and post-graduate supervision.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, it’s important to research local pathways. Find out how to become a marriage and family therapist in Durham for North Carolina regulations, or learn how to become an mft in El Paso to meet Texas standards.

As online degrees become increasingly recognized, they offer flexible pathways for those looking to enter rewarding mental health careers nationwide. Always verify state-specific licensure steps and accredited programs before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Lueken

Trending Scientists