World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carole L. Yauk

Carole L. Yauk

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
12346
World Ranking
8863
National Ranking
307

Carole L. Yauk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carole L. Yauk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 254 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Carole L. Yauk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carole L. Yauk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carole L. Yauk is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research focuses primarily on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a substantial number of publications in related subfields such as molecular biology, cancer research, health toxicology and mutagenesis, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and computational theory and mathematics.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics within molecular biology and toxicology, including carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, molecular biology techniques and applications, DNA repair mechanisms, the effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, cancer genomics and diagnostics, computational drug discovery methods, and gene expression and cancer classification.

Recent publications by Carole L. Yauk include:

  • High-Throughput Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Primary Hepatocyte Spheroids Exposed to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances as a Platform for Relative Potency Characterization, 2021, Toxicological Sciences
  • Potency Ranking of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using High-Throughput Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Liver Spheroids, 2021, Toxicological Sciences
  • Progress towards an OECD reporting framework for transcriptomics and metabolomics in regulatory toxicology, 2021, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • A Transformative Vision for an Omics-Based Regulatory Chemical Testing Paradigm, 2022, Toxicological Sciences
  • R-ODAF: Omics data analysis framework for regulatory application, 2022, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

The researcher frequently collaborates with Andrew Williams, Matthew J. Meier, Francesco Marchetti, Vinita Chauhan, and Jesse J. Salk, reflecting a network of ongoing partnerships in their field.

Publication venues where Carole L. Yauk has contributed multiple articles include:

  • Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
  • Toxicological Sciences
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • Archives of Toxicology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, and global hypermethylation in mice exposed to particulate air pollution in an urban/industrial location

    Carole Yauk;Aris Polyzos;Andrea Rowan-Carroll;Christopher M. Somers

  • Comprehensive comparison of six microarray technologies

    Carole L. Yauk;M. Lynn Berndt;Andrew Williams;George R. Douglas

  • Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Progress in the Past Decade and Future Perspectives

    D. Krewski;M. E. Andersen;M. G. Tyshenko;K. Krishnan

  • Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework

    Russell S. Thomas;Martin A. Philbert;Scott S. Auerbach;Barbara A. Wetmore

  • Air pollution induces heritable DNA mutations.

    Christopher M. Somers;Carole L. Yauk;Paul A. White;Craig L. J. Parfett

  • Carbon black nanoparticle instillation induces sustained inflammation and genotoxicity in mouse lung and liver

    Julie A Bourdon;Anne T Saber;Nicklas R Jacobsen;Keld A Jensen

  • Pulmonary Response to Surface-Coated Nanotitanium Dioxide Particles Includes Induction of Acute Phase Response Genes, Inflammatory Cascades, and Changes in MicroRNAs: A Toxicogenomic Study

    Sabina Halappanavar;Petra Jackson;Andrew Williams;Keld A. Jensen

  • Recommended approaches in the application of toxicogenomics to derive points of departure for chemical risk assessment

    Reza Farmahin;Andrew Williams;Byron Kuo;Nikolai L. Chepelev

  • MWCNTs of different physicochemical properties cause similar inflammatory responses, but differences in transcriptional and histological markers of fibrosis in mouse lungs.

    Sarah S. Poulsen;Anne T. Saber;Andrew Williams;Ole Andersen

  • BMDExpress 2: enhanced transcriptomic dose-response analysis workflow.

    Jason R Phillips;Daniel L Svoboda;Arpit Tandon;Shyam Patel

  • Comparison of toxicogenomics and traditional approaches to inform mode of action and points of departure in human health risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene in drinking water

    Ivy Moffat;Nikolai L. Chepelev;Sarah Labib;Julie Bourdon-Lacombe

  • Nano-risk Science: application of toxicogenomics in an adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    Sarah Labib;Andrew Williams;Carole L. Yauk;Jake K. Nikota

  • Multilocus DNA fingerprinting reveals high rate of heritable genetic mutation in herring gulls nesting in an industrialized urban site

    Carole L. Yauk;James S. Quinn

  • Hepatic and Pulmonary Toxicogenomic Profiles in Mice Intratracheally Instilled With Carbon Black Nanoparticles Reveal Pulmonary Inflammation, Acute Phase Response, and Alterations in Lipid Homeostasis

    Julie A. Bourdon;Sabina Halappanavar;Anne T. Saber;Nicklas R. Jacobsen

  • Particle-induced pulmonary acute phase response may be the causal link between particle inhalation and cardiovascular disease.

    Anne T. Saber;Nicklas R. Jacobsen;Petra Jackson;Sarah Søs Poulsen

  • Mainstream tobacco smoke causes paternal germ-line DNA mutation.

    Carole L. Yauk;M. Lynn Berndt;Andrew Williams;Andrea Rowan-Carroll

  • Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment:: Report of an ECETOC workshop

    Roland Buesen;Brian N Chorley;Beatriz da Silva Lima;George P. Daston

  • The challenge of the application of 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Background and outlook.

    Ursula G. Sauer;Lize Deferme;Laura Gribaldo;Jörg Hackermüller

  • A novel single molecule analysis of spontaneous and radiation-induced mutation at a mouse tandem repeat locus

    Carole L. Yauk;Yuri E. Dubrova;Gemma R. Grant;Alec J. Jeffreys

  • Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Novel Mechanistic Insight into Murine Biological Responses to Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Lungs and Cultured Lung Epithelial Cells

    Sarah Søs Poulsen;Nicklas R. Jacobsen;Sarah Labib;Dongmei Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulla Vogel
Ulla Vogel Technical University of Denmark
Håkan Wallin
Håkan Wallin National Institute of Occupational Health
Albert J. Fornace
Albert J. Fornace Georgetown University
Roger W. L. Godschalk
Roger W. L. Godschalk Maastricht University
Martin R. Stämpfli
Martin R. Stämpfli McMaster University
David M. DeMarini
David M. DeMarini Environmental Protection Agency
Charles Wood
Charles Wood University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Volker M. Arlt
Volker M. Arlt King's College London
Frederik J. van Schooten
Frederik J. van Schooten Maastricht University
David H. Phillips
David H. Phillips King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your studies beyond Biology and Biochemistry? There are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways to consider in the healthcare sector. For those seeking fast entry into the medical imaging field, explore accelerated radiology tech programs online. These programs combine affordability and flexibility, helping students start a radiology career quickly.

If nutrition science excites you, look into dietitian masters programs. These advanced degrees can help you qualify for roles as a registered dietitian or nutrition specialist, areas that are seeing growing demand.

The allied health field also offers a range of opportunities. Online medical assisting school options allow you to enter patient care roles with flexible schedules and financial aid support. For those wanting a career boost, consider ma to lpn bridge programs online as a pathway for advancing from medical assisting to becoming a licensed practical nurse (LPN).

Online degrees can offer the convenience and specialization needed for a successful healthcare career in the USA, whether you choose clinical, lab-based, or nutrition-focused paths.

Best Scientists Citing Carole L. Yauk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles