World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roger W. L. Godschalk

Roger W. L. Godschalk

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
9030
World Ranking
15230
National Ranking
369

Roger W. L. Godschalk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger W. L. Godschalk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 209 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Roger W. L. Godschalk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger W. L. Godschalk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger W. L. Godschalk is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. They have contributed extensively to subfields including Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work covers a wide array of topics, notably:

  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Roger W. L. Godschalk has published numerous papers in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Mutagenesis
  • Nature Protocols
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research

Some recent papers showcasing their research contributions are:

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results, 2020, Nature Protocols
  • Measuring DNA modifications with the comet assay: a compendium of protocols, 2023, Nature Protocols
  • The hCOMET project: International database comparison of results with the comet assay in human biomonitoring. Baseline frequency of DNA damage and effect of main confounders, 2021, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
  • DNA damage in circulating leukocytes measured with the comet assay may predict the risk of death, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • An optimized comet-based in vitro DNA repair assay to assess base and nucleotide excision repair activity, 2020, Nature Protocols

The scientist regularly collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Frederik-Jan van Schooten
  • Andrew Collins
  • Sabine A. S. Langie
  • Gunnar Brunborg
  • Amaya Azqueta

Best Publications

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results

    Peter Møller;Amaya Azqueta;Elisa Boutet-Robinet;Gudrun Koppen

  • Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, and global hypermethylation in mice exposed to particulate air pollution in an urban/industrial location

    Carole Yauk;Aris Polyzos;Andrea Rowan-Carroll;Christopher M. Somers

  • Genotoxic effects of neutrophils and hypochlorous acid.

    Nejla Güngör;Ad M. Knaapen;Ad M. Knaapen;Armelle Munnia;Marco Peluso

  • A profile of volatile organic compounds in breath discriminates COPD patients from controls.

    J.J.B.N. Van Berkel;J.W. Dallinga;G.M. Möller;R.W.L. Godschalk

  • Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as a diagnostic tool for asthma in children.

    J W Dallinga;C M H H T Robroeks;J J B N van Berkel;E J C Moonen

  • Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial.

    Lykke Forchhammer;Clara Johansson;Steffen Loft;Lennart Möller

  • Effects of plant sterol and stanol ester consumption on lipid metabolism, antioxidant status and markers of oxidative stress, endothelial function and low-grade inflammation in patients on current statin treatment

    A De Jong;J Plat;A Bast;R W L Godschalk

  • Development of accurate classification method based on the analysis of volatile organic compounds from human exhaled air.

    J.J.B.N. Van Berkel;J.W. Dallinga;G.M. Möller;R.W.L. Godschalk

  • A critical evaluation of DNA adducts as biological markers for human exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds.

    Roger W. L. Godschalk;Frederik-Jan Van Schooten;Helmut Bartsch

  • Adult-onset, short-term dietary restriction reduces cell senescence in mice

    Chunfang Wang;Mandy Maddick;Satomi Miwa;Diana Jurk

  • An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay

    Clara Johansson;Peter Møller;Lykke Forchhammer;Steffen Loft

  • You are what you eat, and so are your children: the impact of micronutrients on the epigenetic programming of offspring.

    Kimberly Vanhees;Indira G. C. Vonhögen;Frederik J. van Schooten;Roger W. L. Godschalk

  • Comparison of multiple DNA adduct types in tumor adjacent human lung tissue: effect of cigarette smoking

    R.W.L. Godschalk;J. Nair;F.J. van Schooten;A. Risch

  • In vitro and in vivo studies on oxygen free radical and DNA adduct formation in rat lung and liver during benzo[a]pyrene metabolism.

    Jacob J. Briedé;Roger W.L. Godschalk;Marijn T.G. Emans;Theo M.C.M. de Kok

  • Assessment and reduction of comet assay variation in relation to DNA damage: studies from the European Comet Assay Validation Group.

    Peter Møller;Lennart Möller;Roger W. L. Godschalk;George D. D. Jones

  • Dietary flavonoids induce MLL translocations in primary human CD34+ cells.

    Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani;Jannie Janssen;Lou M. Maas;Roger W.L. Godschalk

  • Differences in aromatic-DNA adduct levels between alveolar macrophages and subpopulations of white blood cells from smokers.

    R. W. L. Godschalk;L. M. Maas;N. Van Zandwijk;L. J. Van't Veer

  • An ECVAG inter-laboratory validation study of the comet assay: inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory variations of DNA strand breaks and FPG-sensitive sites in human mononuclear cells

    Clara Ersson;Peter Møller;Lykke Forchhammer;Steffen Loft

  • Cigarette smoke-induced transgenerational alterations in genome stability in cord blood of human F1 offspring

    Julian Laubenthal;Olga Zlobinskaya;Krzysztof Poterlowicz;Adolf Baumgartner

  • 32P-postlabelling of aromatic DNA adducts in white blood cells and alveolar macrophages of smokers: saturation at high exposures.

    F.J Van Schooten;R.W.L Godschalk;A Breedijk;L.M Maas

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederik J. van Schooten
Frederik J. van Schooten Maastricht University
Jos C. S. Kleinjans
Jos C. S. Kleinjans Maastricht University
Leo J. Schouten
Leo J. Schouten Maastricht University
Piet A. van den Brandt
Piet A. van den Brandt Maastricht University
David H. Phillips
David H. Phillips King's College London
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Maurice P. Zeegers
Maurice P. Zeegers Maastricht University
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo
Gunnar Brunborg
Gunnar Brunborg Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Carole L. Yauk
Carole L. Yauk University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often leads students to various health and science fields. With the growth of remote learning, there are now diverse online degrees to help launch or advance your career. For those interested in the intersection of science and health data, a him degree online teaches how to manage medical records and information systems, which are crucial in healthcare facilities.

Nutrition is another exciting path, especially for those passionate about health, food science, or wellness. Earning a masters in nutrition online provides a flexible route to gain expertise in dietetics, public health, or community nutrition.

If clinical roles appeal to you, consider technology-focused programs such as sonography programs online. These programs train students to use imaging technology vital in diagnostics and patient care. Similarly, working as a radiologic technologist is possible with affordable, accredited radiology tech online programs.

Each of these online pathways supports both new students and career changers, offering the flexibility to study from anywhere while gaining skills that are in high demand across the healthcare and science sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Roger W. L. Godschalk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles