World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 102 709 669 104 99 476 35714

David H. Phillips publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David H. Phillips between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David H. Phillips published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1998. 8 of the 551 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1998. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 17 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 22 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1976 2025

551 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David H. Phillips: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 8
1979 4
1980 2
1981 5
1982 3
1983 5
1984 5
1985 3
1986 5
1987 4
1988 13
1989 8
1990 16
1991 17
1992 16
1993 17
1994 16
1995 7
1996 14
1997 10
1998 22
1999 21
2000 19
2001 18
2002 15
2003 17
2004 16
2005 21
2006 17
2007 16
2008 15
2009 14
2010 15
2011 19
2012 21
2013 11
2014 9
2015 6
2016 15
2017 10
2018 14
2019 12
2020 7
2021 4
2022 2
2023 6
2024 5
2025 3
Total 551
Download as CSV

David H. Phillips publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 475–484 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 476 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21 476
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

David H. Phillips D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55 102
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

David H. Phillips is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on cancer research and toxicology.

Their work covers a range of topics including carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, pharmacogenetics and drug metabolism, cancer genomics and diagnostics, effects and risks of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, genetically modified organisms research, potato plant research, and plant pathogens and resistance.

Frequent publication venues for David H. Phillips include:

  • The Lancet Oncology
  • Mutagenesis
  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Archives of Toxicology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Common collaborators include:

  • Volker M. Arlt
  • Jill E. Kucab
  • Lisa Hölzl-Armstrong
  • Fatiha El Ghissassi
  • Mary K. Schubauer-Berigan

Recent papers authored or coauthored by David H. Phillips include:

  • "Carcinogenicity of acrolein, crotonaldehyde, and arecoline," 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • "Carcinogenicity of aspartame, methyleugenol, and isoeugenol," 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • "Organoids for toxicology and genetic toxicology: applications with drugs and prospects for environmental carcinogenesis," 2021, Mutagenesis
  • "Mutagenicity of acrylamide and glycidamide in human TP53 knock-in (Hupki) mouse embryo fibroblasts," 2020, Archives of Toxicology
  • "Enhanced DNA adduct formation by benzo[a]pyrene in human liver cells lacking cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase," 2020, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Best Publications

  • Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking

    Michael Alavanja;John A. Baron;Ross C. Brownson;Patricia A. Buffler

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the diet.

    David H Phillips

  • Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer

    Ludmil B Alexandrov;Ludmil B Alexandrov;Young Seok Ju;Kerstin Haase;Peter Van Loo;Peter Van Loo

  • Fifty years of benzo( a )pyrene

    David H. Phillips

  • Structure-Activity Studies of the Carcinogenicities in the Mouse and Rat of Some Naturally Occurring and Synthetic Alkenylbenzene Derivatives Related to Safrole and Estragole

    E C Miller;A B Swanson;D H Phillips;T L Fletcher

  • Genotypes of glutathione transferase M1 and P1 and their significance for lung DNA adduct levels and cancer risk.

    D Ryberg;V Skaug;A Hewer;D H Phillips

  • A Compendium of Mutational Signatures of Environmental Agents

    Jill E. Kucab;Xueqing Zou;Xueqing Zou;Sandro Morganella;Madeleine Joel

  • Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and risk of non-small cell lung cancer

    Shanbeh Zienolddiny;Daniele Campa;Helge Lind;David Ryberg

  • Oxidative DNA damage mediated by copper(II), iron(II) and nickel(II) Fenton reactions: evidence for site-specific mechanisms in the formation of double-strand breaks, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and putative intrastrand cross-links

    Daniel R Lloyd;David H Phillips

  • Correlation of DNA adduct levels in human lung with cigarette smoking

    David H. Phillips;Alan Hewer;Carl N. Martin;R. Colin Garner

  • DNA adducts from chemotherapeutic agents

    P D Lawley;David Phillips

  • Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues.

    David H. Phillips

  • Heterogeneous DNA damage and repair in the mammalian genome.

    Vilhelm A. Bohr;David H. Phillips;Philip C. Hanawalt

  • Genotoxic potential of tamoxifen and analogues in female Fischer F344/n rats, DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice and in human MCL-5 cells.

    I N White;F de Matteis;A Davies;L L Smith

  • Sex Differences in Lung CYP1A1 Expression and DNA Adduct Levels among Lung Cancer Patients

    Steen Mollerup;David Ryberg;Allan Hewer;David H. Phillips

  • STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology: Molecular Epidemiology STROBE-ME. An extension of the STROBE statement

    Valentina Gallo;Matthias Egger;Valerie McCormack;Peter B Farmer

  • Diversity of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in the human prostate.

    J. Clark;S. Merson;S. Jhavar;P. Flohr

  • The 32P-postlabeling assay for DNA adducts.

    David H Phillips;Volker M Arlt

  • 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice

    D H Phillips;M V Reddy;K Randerath

  • Different susceptibility to smoking-induced DNA damage among male and female lung cancer patients.

    David Ryberg;Alan Hewer;David H. Phillips;Aage Haugen

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker M. Arlt
Volker M. Arlt King's College London
Philip L. Grover
Philip L. Grover Institute of Cancer Research
Marie Stiborová
Marie Stiborová Charles University
Heinz H. Schmeiser
Heinz H. Schmeiser German Cancer Research Center
Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Giuseppe Matullo
Giuseppe Matullo University of Turin
Paolo Vineis
Paolo Vineis Imperial College London
Hansruedi Glatt
Hansruedi Glatt Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Peter B. Farmer
Peter B. Farmer University of Leicester
Eva Frei
Eva Frei Charles University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a broad range of online healthcare degrees and fast-track medical careers. Many students and professionals seek flexible options to build or advance careers without sacrificing current commitments.

Those interested in nursing can pursue rn to bsn no clinicals programs, which allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing online with limited or no in-person requirements. For those aiming higher, the shortest dnp program options provide accelerated paths to a Doctor of Nursing Practice with condensed coursework and flexible schedules.

Not everyone needs years of study—some healthcare roles offer rapid entry. Check out medical assistant programs accelerated for information about becoming a medical assistant in as little as six weeks. Alternatively, individuals looking for user-friendly advanced degrees should consider the easiest dnp program online to streamline their education.

With so many flexible online options, it’s easier than ever to find a degree or career pathway that aligns with your goals in the ever-evolving field of genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles