World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10399 9733 594 579 141 6855

Ian M. Shochet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian M. Shochet between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian M. Shochet published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2010. 7 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2010. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1983 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian M. Shochet: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 6
2000 1
2001 4
2002 3
2003 1
2004 6
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 2
2009 5
2010 12
2011 6
2012 7
2013 8
2014 9
2015 6
2016 6
2017 3
2018 3
2019 3
2020 7
2021 8
2022 7
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 151
Download as CSV

Ian M. Shochet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Shochet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian M. Shochet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Shochet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian M. Shochet is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, with a significant emphasis on clinical psychology. They have contributed extensively to the understanding of child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, resilience and mental health, and issues related to suicide and self-harm.

The main fields of study for Shochet include:

  • Psychology

Within this broad discipline, their subfields of study are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Key topics frequently addressed in their work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Shochet's recent papers illustrate the thematic range and depth of their research. These include:

  • "General Belonging is a Key Predictor of Adolescent Depressive Symptoms and Partially Mediates School Belonging," 2020, published in School Mental Health
  • "A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research of the Experiences of Young People and their Caregivers Affected by Suicidality and Self-harm: Implications for Family-Based Treatment," 2021, published in Adolescent Research Review
  • "Emotion Regulation as a Risk Factor for Suicide Ideation among Adolescents and Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Belongingness," 2020, published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Validation of the coping self-efficacy scale: Vietnamese version for adolescents," 2022, published in BMC Psychology
  • "School-based, two-arm, parallel, controlled trial of a culturally adapted resilience intervention to improve adolescent mental health in Vietnam: study protocol," 2020, published in BMJ Open

Frequently published venues for Shochet include:

  • Tạp chí Y học Dự phòng
  • School Mental Health
  • BMC Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies

Their frequent co-authors in research collaborations are:

  • Astrid Wurfl
  • Jayne Orr
  • Ruby Stocker
  • Jane Fisher
  • Thach Tran

Best Publications

  • School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study

    Ian M. Shochet;Mark R. Dadds;David R. Ham;Roslyn Montague

  • Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors.

    Debra K Creedy;Ian M Shochet;Jan Horsfall

  • The efficacy of a universal school-based program to prevent adolescent depression

    Ian M. Shochet;Mark R. Dadds;Denise Holland;Kathy L. Whitefield

  • Universal online interventions might engage psychologically distressed university students who are unlikely to seek formal help

    Megan L. Ryan;Ian M. Shochet;Helen M. Stallman

  • Do autism spectrum disorders differ from each other and from non-spectrum disorders on emotion recognition tests

    Murray J. Dyck;Kara Ferguson;Ian M. Shochet

  • School-Based Programs for Increasing Connectedness and Reducing Risk Behavior: A Systematic Review

    Rebekah L. Chapman;Lisa Buckley;Mary Sheehan;Ian Shochet

  • Emotion recognition/understanding ability in hearing or vision-impaired children: do sounds, sights, or words make the difference?

    Murray J. Dyck;Charles Farrugia;Ian M. Shochet;Martez Holmes-Brown

  • Predicting post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress in firefighters

    Deanne Armstrong;Jane Shakespeare-Finch;Ian Shochet

  • Prevalence of mental health problems in Australian university health services

    Helen Margaret Stallman;Ian Shochet

  • Examination of the Latent Structure of the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale

    Sukkyung You;Kristin M. Ritchey;Michael J. Furlong;Ian Shochet

  • A prospective study investigating the impact of school belonging factors on negative affect in adolescents.

    Ian M. Shochet;Coral L. Smith;Michael J. Furlong;Ross Homel

  • The impact of parental attachment on adolescent perception of the school environment and school connectedness.

    Ian M. Shochet;Tanya Smyth;Ross Homel

  • The link between belongingness and depressive symptoms: An exploration in the workplace interpersonal context

    Wendell David Cockshaw;Ian Shochet

  • The impact of school connectedness on violent behavior, transport risk-taking behavior, and associated injuries in adolescence

    Rebekah L. Chapman;Lisa D. Buckley;Mary C. Sheehan;Ian M. Shochet

  • Being on PAR: Outcomes of a pilot trial to improve mental health and wellbeing in the workplace with the promoting adult resilience (PAR) program

    Prudence Millear;Poppy Liossis;Ian M Shochet;Herbert Biggs

  • The Impact of Mental Health Literacy on Help-Seeking Intentions: Results of a Pilot Study with First Year Psychology Students

    Coral L Smith;Ian M Shochet

  • How do school connectedness and attachment to parents interrelate in predicting adolescent depressive symptoms

    Ian M. Shochet;Ross Homel;Wendell D. Cockshaw;Danielle T. Montgomery

  • The Promoting Adult Resilience (PAR) Program: The Effectiveness of the Second, Shorter Pilot of a Workplace Prevention Program

    Poppy L Liossis;Ian M Shochet;Prudence M Millear;Herbert Biggs

  • General Belongingness, Workplace Belongingness, and Depressive Symptoms

    Wendell David Cockshaw;Ian M. Shochet;Patricia L. Obst

  • Community psychology : panic or panacea

    M. Seedat;N Cloete;I.M. Shochet

  • The role of social skills and school connectedness in preadolescent depressive symptoms.

    Anthony G Ross;Ian M Shochet;Rachael Bellair

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Shakespeare-Finch
Jane Shakespeare-Finch Queensland University of Technology
Mark R. Dadds
Mark R. Dadds University of Sydney
Ross Homel
Ross Homel Griffith University
Michael J. Furlong
Michael J. Furlong University of California, Santa Barbara
Ross McD. Young
Ross McD. Young University of the Sunshine Coast
Leanne Hides
Leanne Hides University of Queensland
Patricia L. Obst
Patricia L. Obst Queensland University of Technology
Paula Brough
Paula Brough Griffith University
Patrick C. L. Heaven
Patrick C. L. Heaven Australian Catholic University
Kim Foster
Kim Foster Australian Catholic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the growing demand for flexible education, online psychology degrees have become a popular option for students across the USA. These programs offer convenience, allowing learners to balance work, family, and study while advancing their careers. There’s a wide variety of online degrees available, from bachelor’s to doctorate programs, designed to fit different professional goals and schedules.

For those just starting their psychology journey, the easiest online psychology bachelor's in Houston provides a solid foundation and introduces core concepts in the field. At the graduate level, students can explore specialized paths such as clinical, counseling, or organizational psychology. If you’re considering a master’s degree, check out the easiest online master's in psychology degree programs in California or learn about the Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online for region-specific options.

Those aiming for advanced clinical or research positions might pursue the USA easiest psychology doctorate degree online. These flexible online pathways can lead to careers in mental health, education, business, and beyond. Each program varies in terms of prerequisites, specializations, and career outcomes, so it’s vital to research programs that align with your objectives.

Best Scientists Citing Ian M. Shochet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles