World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tilmann von Soest

Tilmann von Soest

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7578 7067 70 67 138 6912

Tilmann von Soest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tilmann von Soest between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tilmann von Soest published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 37 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 19 publications
2004 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tilmann von Soest: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 3
2011 6
2012 9
2013 5
2014 9
2015 6
2016 6
2017 8
2018 7
2019 10
2020 16
2021 10
2022 22
2023 28
2024 18
2025 19
Total 193
Download as CSV

Tilmann von Soest publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilmann von Soest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 138 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 138
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tilmann von Soest D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilmann von Soest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tilmann von Soest is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology and Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and General Health Professions.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Tilmann von Soest include:

  • The development of loneliness through adolescence and young adulthood: Its nature, correlates, and midlife outcomes (2020, Developmental Psychology)
  • Livstilfredshet blant ungdom før og under covid-19-pandemien (2020, Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening)

Tilmann von Soest has frequently collaborated with a range of co-authors such as:

  • Willy Pedersen
  • Lia Ferschmann
  • Christian K. Tamnes
  • Laura Cortés-García
  • Rubén Rodríguez-Cano

Their work has been published multiple times in notable venues, including:

  • Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

Tilmann von Soest's research addresses various aspects of adolescent psychological and emotional development, mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and wider psychosocial well-being. Their interdisciplinary approach bridges clinical and social psychology with developmental contexts.

Best Publications

  • Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study

    Kristin Gustavson;Tilmann von Soest;Tilmann von Soest;Evalill Karevold;Espen Røysamb;Espen Røysamb

  • The impact of subjective birth experiences on post-traumatic stress symptoms: a longitudinal study

    Susan Garthus-Niegel;Susan Garthus-Niegel;Tilmann von Soest;Margarete E. Vollrath;Margarete E. Vollrath;Malin Eberhard-Gran;Malin Eberhard-Gran

  • The Development of Global and Domain-Specific Self-Esteem From Age 13 to 31

    Tilmann von Soest;Lars Wichstrøm;Ingela Lundin Kvalem

  • Psychosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery.

    Tilmann von Soest;Ingela L Kvalem;Knut Chr Skolleborg;Helge E Roald

  • A Validation Study of the Resilience Scale for Adolescents (READ)

    Tilmann von Soest;Svein Mossige;Kari Stefansen;Odin Hjemdal

  • Symptoms of Internet Gaming Disorder in Youth: Predictors and Comorbidity

    Lars Wichstrøm;Frode Stenseng;Jay Belsky;Tilmann von Soest

  • Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: Its nature and correlates.

    Tilmann von Soest;Maike Luhmann;Thomas Hansen;Denis Gerstorf

  • The Role of Labor Pain and Overall Birth Experience in the Development of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

    Susan Garthus-Niegel;Cecilie Knoph;Tilmann von Soest;Christopher S. Nielsen

  • Smoking, nicotine dependence and mental health among young adults: a 13‐year population‐based longitudinal study

    Willy Pedersen;Tilmann von Soest

  • Mediation Analysis in a Latent Growth Curve Modeling Framework

    Tilmann von Soest;Knut A. Hagtvet

  • Secular trends in depressive symptoms among Norwegian adolescents from 1992 to 2010

    Tilmann von Soest;Tilmann von Soest;Lars Wichstrøm

  • The Impact of Postpartum Posttraumatic Stress and Depression Symptoms on Couples’ Relationship Satisfaction: A Population-Based Prospective Study

    Susan Garthus-Niegel;Antje Horsch;Eric Handtke;Tilmann von Soest

  • The influence of women’s preferences and actual mode of delivery on post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth: a population-based, longitudinal study

    Susan Garthus-Niegel;Susan Garthus-Niegel;Susan Garthus-Niegel;Tilmann von Soest;Tilmann von Soest;Cecilie Knoph;Tone Breines Simonsen

  • Self-esteem across the second half of life: The role of socioeconomic status, physical health, social relationships, and personality factors.

    Tilmann von Soest;Jenny Wagner;Thomas Hansen;Denis Gerstorf

  • Psychosocial changes after cosmetic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

    Tilmann von Soest;Ingela L. Kvalem;Knut C. Skolleborg;Helge E. Roald

  • Reciprocal relations between body satisfaction and self-esteem: A large 13-year prospective study of adolescents.

    Lars Wichstrøm;Tilmann von Soest

  • Picky eating in preschool children: the predictive role of the child's temperament and mother's negative affectivity.

    Gertrud Sofie Hafstad;Dawit Shawel Abebe;Dawit Shawel Abebe;Leila Torgersen;Tilmann von Soest;Tilmann von Soest

  • The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire – a factor analytic study

    Susan Garthus-Niegel;Hege Therese Størksen;Leila Torgersen;Tilmann Von Soest

  • The interplay of personality and negative comments about appearance in predicting body image.

    Ingela Lundin Kvalem;Tilmann von Soest;Helge E. Roald;Knut Chr. Skolleborg

  • Predicting hazardous drinking in late adolescence/young adulthood from early and excessive adolescent drinking - a longitudinal cross-national study of Norwegian and Australian adolescents

    Frøydis Enstad;Tracy Evans-Whipp;Anne Kjeldsen;John W. Toumbourou

Frequent Co-Authors

Willy Pedersen
Willy Pedersen University of Oslo
Susan Garthus-Niegel
Susan Garthus-Niegel Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Lars Wichstrøm
Lars Wichstrøm Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Espen Røysamb
Espen Røysamb University of Oslo
Lars Smith
Lars Smith University of Oslo
Susan Ayers
Susan Ayers City, University of London
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Egil W. Martinsen
Egil W. Martinsen University of Oslo
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas Hansen
Thomas Hansen Copenhagen University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Understanding the educational pathways and certification requirements is essential for those interested in psychology careers. Many students choose online psychology degrees to gain flexibility while preparing for a variety of roles, such as mental health counseling. Each state and city has unique standards for licensure, supervision hours, and practical experience.

For example, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Spokane, you’ll need to fulfill Washington’s specific education and clinical experience requirements. Similarly, those interested in the field can review the St. Louis mental health counselor certification requirements to understand Missouri’s pathways to practice.

Prospective counselors aiming to practice in Florida should explore how to become a mental health counselor in St. Petersburg. Likewise, it’s important to research mental health counselor requirements in Stockton, California, if you plan to work in that state.

No matter your location, reviewing selected state or city-specific requirements helps you choose the right online degree and prepare effectively for licensure and a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tilmann von Soest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles