World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2832 2597 116 113 331 16167

Denis Gerstorf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Denis Gerstorf between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Denis Gerstorf published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 19.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2021. 66 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2021. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 35 publications
2004 2025

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Denis Gerstorf: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 7
2009 14
2010 7
2011 13
2012 5
2013 16
2014 20
2015 17
2016 21
2017 27
2018 35
2019 24
2020 35
2021 42
2022 33
2023 31
2024 31
2025 35
Total 425
Download as CSV

Denis Gerstorf publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis Gerstorf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 331 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 331
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Denis Gerstorf D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis Gerstorf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Denis Gerstorf is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a notable focus on subfields such as social psychology, health, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics of Gerstorf's work include health disparities and outcomes, aging and gerontology research, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, mental health research topics, psychological and temporal perspectives research, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, and personality traits and psychology.

Gerstorf has contributed extensively to scholarly literature, with frequent publications appearing in several journals. Notable venues for their work include Innovation in Aging, Psychology and Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Gerontology.

Among recent scholarly articles, some of the notable publications are:

  • Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges, 2020, American Psychologist
  • The development of loneliness through adolescence and young adulthood: Its nature, correlates, and midlife outcomes, 2020, Developmental Psychology
  • Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples, 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • Charting adult development through (historically changing) daily stress processes, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Health Behaviors? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis, 2020, Collabra Psychology

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as Christiane A. Hoppmann, Johanna Drewelies, Theresa Pauly, Ilja Demuth, and Nilàm Ram. These partnerships have resulted in dozens of joint publications, reflecting sustained research cooperation.

Best Publications

  • Regional Brain Changes in Aging Healthy Adults: General Trends, Individual Differences and Modifiers

    Naftali Raz;Ulman Lindenberger;Karen M. Rodrigue;Kristen M. Kennedy

  • Time-Structured and Net Intraindividual Variability: Tools for Examining the Development of Dynamic Characteristics and Processes

    Nilam Ram;Denis Gerstorf

  • Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: 16-year longitudinal results from the Berlin Aging Study.

    Dana Kotter-Grühn;Anna Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn;Denis Gerstorf;Jacqui Smith

  • Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life.

    Denis Gerstorf;Nilam Ram;Guy Mayraz;Mira Hidajat

  • Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges.

    Frank J. Infurna;Denis Gerstorf;Margie E. Lachman

  • Decline in Life Satisfaction in Old Age: Longitudinal Evidence for Links to Distance-to-Death

    Denis Gerstorf;Nilam Ram;Christina Röcke;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Life Satisfaction Shows Terminal Decline in Old Age: Longitudinal Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP).

    Denis Gerstorf;Nilam Ram;Ryne Estabrook;Jürgen Schupp;Jürgen Schupp

  • Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies

    Eileen Kranz Graham;Joshua P. Rutsohn;Nicholas A. Turiano;Rebecca Bendayan

  • Long-Term Antecedents and Outcomes of Perceived Control

    Frank J. Infurna;Denis Gerstorf;Nilam Ram;Jürgen Schupp

  • Cohort Differences in Cognitive Aging and Terminal Decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study

    Denis Gerstorf;Nilam Ram;Christiane Hoppmann;Sherry L. Willis

  • Ideographic filters for psychological constructs

    John R. Nesselroade;Denis Gerstorf;Sam A. Hardy;NIlam Ram

  • Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: Its nature and correlates.

    Tilmann von Soest;Maike Luhmann;Thomas Hansen;Denis Gerstorf

  • Spousal interrelations in old age--a mini-review.

    Christiane Hoppmann;Denis Gerstorf

  • Individual Characteristics and Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

    Nanna Notthoff;Peter Reisch;Denis Gerstorf

  • Personality trait development at the end of life: Antecedents and correlates of mean-level trajectories.

    Jenny Wagner;Nilam Ram;Jacqui Smith;Denis Gerstorf

  • Stability of Sex Differences in Cognition in Advanced Old Age: The Role of Education and Attrition

    Denis Gerstorf;Agneta Herlitz;Jacqui Smith

  • Forecasting life satisfaction across adulthood: Benefits of seeing a dark future?

    Frieder R. Lang;David Weiss;Denis Gerstorf;Gert G. Wagner

  • Well-being affects changes in perceptual speed in advanced old age: Longitudinal evidence for a dynamic link.

    Denis Gerstorf;Martin Lövdén;Christina Röcke;Christina Röcke;Jacqui Smith

  • Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples

    Eileen K. Graham;Sara J. Weston;Denis Gerstorf;Denis Gerstorf;Tomiko B. Yoneda

  • The nature and cross-domain correlates of subjective age in the oldest old: Evidence from the OCTO Study.

    Frank J. Infurna;Denis Gerstorf;Suzanne Robertson;Stig Berg

  • Antecedent–Consequent Relations of Perceived Control to Health and Social Support: Longitudinal Evidence for Between-Domain Associations Across Adulthood

    Denis Gerstorf;Christina Röcke;Margie E. Lachman

Frequent Co-Authors

Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Gert G. Wagner
Gert G. Wagner German Institute for Economic Research
Christiane A. Hoppmann
Christiane A. Hoppmann University of British Columbia
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Frank J. Infurna
Frank J. Infurna Arizona State University
Jürgen Schupp
Jürgen Schupp German Institute for Economic Research
Jacqui Smith
Jacqui Smith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary A. Luszcz
Mary A. Luszcz Flinders University
Jutta Heckhausen
Jutta Heckhausen University of California, Irvine
K. Warner Schaie
K. Warner Schaie University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online programs and career options, including counseling roles that require specific licensure. Many students consider becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), but licensure requirements vary significantly by state. For example, the lpc licensure requirements in Kansas focus on supervised experience, education credits, and passing a comprehensive exam.

If you are wondering how to get an lpc license in Kentucky, you'll find unique coursework prerequisites and application procedures. Similarly, the Louisiana lpc licensure requirements emphasize a blend of graduate-level coursework and clinical hours.

In Maine, the Maine licensed professional counselor requirements also highlight state-specific supervised practice and examination policies. When considering online psychology degrees, it is important to research the licensure rules of the state where you plan to practice. This can influence the curriculum you should choose and the clinical experiences you need to complete.

Best Scientists Citing Denis Gerstorf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles