World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
23724
World Ranking
2134
National Ranking
1245

Jacqui Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqui Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 224 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jacqui Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqui Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Jacqui Smith is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States, where their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology. Their work spans several subfields including health, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, demography, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and gerontology research
  • Psychological well-being and life satisfaction
  • Retirement, disability, and employment
  • Intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Health, environment, cognitive aging

Jacqui Smith has published extensively, with a frequent presence in the journal "Innovation in Aging" where they have 33 publications. Other common venues include "The Journals of Gerontology Series B" with 4 papers, "Psychology and Aging" with 3 papers, and "Deep Blue (University of Michigan)" with 2 papers.

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire 2006 - 2022, 2023, Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
  • Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples, 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • Changes in optimism and pessimism in response to life events: Evidence from three large panel studies, 2020, Journal of Research in Personality
  • Associations Between Satisfaction With Aging and Health and Well-being Outcomes Among Older US Adults, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Multigenerational Households During Childhood and Trajectories of Cognitive Functioning Among U.S. Older Adults, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

The scholar has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Marina Larkina
  • Richard Gonzalez
  • Amanda Sonnega
  • Shannon T. Mejía
  • Denis Gerstorf

Jacqui Smith has received recognition as a Member of Academia Europaea since 2003, which highlights a sustained level of academic involvement. Their publication record shows a clear concentration on aging research and associated social and psychological factors, indicating a multidisciplinary approach to understanding well-being and cognitive health in older populations.

Best Publications

  • Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits

    K. Anders Ericsson;Jacqui Smith

  • New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age.

    Paul B. Baltes;Jacqui Smith

  • Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis

    Paul B. Baltes;Jacqui Smith

  • Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study.

    Ute Kunzmann;Todd D. Little;Jacqui Smith

  • Handbook of theories of aging

    Vern L. Bengtson;Richard A. Jr. Settersten;Brian K. Kennedy;Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Die Berliner Altersstudie

    Ulman Lindenberger;Jacqui Smith;Karl Ulrich Mayer;Paul B. Baltes

  • Testing-the-Limits and the Study of Adult Age Differences in Cognitive Plasticity of a Mnemonic Skill

    Reinhold Kliegl;Jacqui Smith;Paul B. Baltes

  • Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: An introduction.

    K. Anders Ericsson;Jacqui Smith

  • People nominated as wise: a comparative study of wisdom-related knowledge.

    Paul B. Baltes;Ursula M. Staudinger;Andreas Maercker;Jacqui Smith

  • Working memory plasticity in old age: Practice gain, transfer, and maintenance.

    Shu Chen Li;Florian Schmiedek;Oliver Huxhold;Christina Röcke

  • The Fascination of Wisdom: Its Nature, Ontogeny, and Function

    Paul B. Baltes;Jacqui Smith

  • Social Network Types Among Older Adults: A Multidimensional Approach

    Katherine L. Fiori;Jacqui Smith;Toni C. Antonucci

  • Self-Perceptions of Aging: Do Subjective Age and Satisfaction With Aging Change During Old Age?

    Anna Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn;Dana Kotter-Grühn;Jacqui Smith

  • Health and Well–Being in the Young Old and Oldest Old

    Jacqui Smith;Markus Borchelt;Heiner Maier;Daniela Jopp

  • Wisdom-related knowledge: Age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems.

    Jacqui Smith;Paul B. Baltes

  • Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: 16-year longitudinal results from the Berlin Aging Study.

    Dana Kotter-Grühn;Anna Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn;Denis Gerstorf;Jacqui Smith

  • Psychological Predictors of Mortality in Old Age

    Heiner Maier;Jacqui Smith

  • Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: do older adults fluctuate less than young adults?

    Christina Röcke;Shu Chen Li;Jacqui Smith

  • Wisdom and successful aging.

    Paul B. Baltes;Jacqui Smith;Ursula M. Staudinger

  • Resources and life-management strategies as determinants of successful aging: On the protective effect of selection, optimization, and compensation.

    Daniela Jopp;Jacqui Smith

  • New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the Fourth Age. Keynote lecture at the Valencia Forum, International Scientific Congress, Valencia, Spain

    Paul B. Baltes;Jacqui Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric S. Kim
Eric S. Kim University of British Columbia
Raymond Yung
Raymond Yung University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Toni C. Antonucci
Toni C. Antonucci University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Margret M. Baltes
Margret M. Baltes Freie Universität Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to diverse career pathways, including those in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students pursue online master's degrees or specialized certificates to prepare for licensure and meet state requirements.

One popular and rewarding career is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state—and even city—has unique educational and clinical experience requirements. For example, aspiring therapists can review San Jose mft education requirements and compare them with mft requirements in Santa Ana. Requirements may involve obtaining a relevant master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, and passing a licensing exam.

If you’re considering working outside California, it’s helpful to look at regional differences. For example, you can explore Scottsdale mft education requirements in Arizona or see how to become a marriage and family therapist in Seattle.

Choosing the right online program and understanding local requirements are important steps for a successful psychology career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Jacqui Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles