World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6627 6169 317 312 167 9753

Frieder R. Lang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frieder R. Lang between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frieder R. Lang published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2016. 19 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2016. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1969 2025

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frieder R. Lang: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 6
1995 1
1996 6
1997 8
1998 13
1999 3
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 7
2004 3
2005 3
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 4
2010 2
2011 11
2012 12
2013 8
2014 6
2015 10
2016 14
2017 9
2018 14
2019 7
2020 6
2021 7
2022 10
2023 3
2024 11
2025 8
Total 244
Download as CSV

Frieder R. Lang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frieder R. Lang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 167
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frieder R. Lang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frieder R. Lang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frieder R. Lang is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on aging and gerontology research.

Their research interests span several subfields, including social psychology, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, and demography.

Key topics addressed in their work include:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Their frequent publication venues reflect this interdisciplinary approach, with multiple papers published in:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Psychology and Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • European Journal of Ageing
  • GeroPsych

Frequent collaborators include Yaeji Kim-Knauss, Fiona S. Rupprecht, Kristina Martin, Stefan T. Kamin, and Helene H. Fung, among others.

Selected recent papers representative of their research contributions are:

  • "Employee voice at work: the role of employees' gender, self-efficacy beliefs, and leadership" (2020) published in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • "COVID-19 and perceiving finitude: Associations with future time perspective, death anxiety, and ideal life expectancy." (2021) in Psychology and Aging
  • "Personal ideals of aging and longevity: The role of subjective discordances." (2020) in Psychology and Aging
  • "Participation in activities mediates the effect of Internet use on cognitive functioning in old age" (2020) in International Psychogeriatrics
  • "Late-Life Preparedness and Its Correlates: A Behavioral Perspective on Preparation" (2020) in The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Frieder R. Lang's scholarly output includes over 50 publications primarily situated within psychology, exploring diverse aspects related to aging, mental health, and social factors influencing well-being in later life stages.

Best Publications

  • Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships.

    Frieder R. Lang;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain.

    Frieder R. Lang;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing

    Frieder R. Lang;Dennis John;Oliver Lüdtke;Jürgen Schupp

  • Everyday functioning and successful aging: the impact of resources.

    Margret M. Baltes;Frieder R. Lang

  • Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen

    Frieder R. Lang;Oliver Lüdtke;Jens B. Asendorpf

  • “They” are old but “I” feel younger: Age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age.

    David Weiss;Frieder R. Lang

  • Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain.

    Unknown

  • Regulation of Social Relationships in Later Adulthood

    Frieder R. Lang

  • Age-Related Patterns in Social Networks among European Americans and African Americans: Implications for Socioemotional Selectivity across the Life Span

    Helene H. Fung;Laura L. Carstensen;Frieder R. Lang

  • Adapting to aging losses: do resources facilitate strategies of selection, compensation, and optimization in everyday functioning?

    Frieder R. Lang;Nina Rieckmann;Margret M. Baltes

  • Blood is thicker than water: kinship orientation across adulthood.

    Franz Josef Neyer;Frieder R. Lang

  • Perceived control over development and subjective well-being: differential benefits across adulthood.

    Frieder R. Lang;Jutta Heckhausen

  • How art changes your brain: differential effects of visual art production and cognitive art evaluation on functional brain connectivity.

    Anne Bolwerk;Jessica Mack-Andrick;Frieder R. Lang;Arnd Dörfler

  • The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self report : Technical report 1999

    Paul B. Baltes;Margret M. Baltes;Alexandra M. Freund;Frieder R. Lang

  • Perspectives on Socioemotional Selectivity in Late Life: How Personality and Social Context Do (and Do Not) Make a Difference

    Frieder R. Lang;Ursula M. Staudinger;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Endings and Continuity of Social Relationships: Maximizing Intrinsic Benefits within Personal Networks when Feeling Near to Death

    Frieder R. Lang

  • Everyday functioning and successful aging: The impact of resources.

    Unknown

  • Depression bei Hochbetagten Ergebnisse der Berliner Altersstudie

    Michael Linden;G. Kurtz;Margret M. Baltes;Bernhard Geiselmann

  • Soziale Beziehungen alter Menschen

    Michael Wagner;Yvonne Schütze;Frieder R. Lang

  • Perceived control over development and subjective well-being: Differential benefits across adulthood.

    Unknown

  • Forecasting life satisfaction across adulthood: Benefits of seeing a dark future?

    Frieder R. Lang;David Weiss;Denis Gerstorf;Gert G. Wagner

  • Future Time Perspective Scale

    Laura L. Carstensen;Frieder R. Lang

  • Growing Together: Personal Relationships across the Life Span

    Frieder R. Lang;Karen L. Fingerman

  • Social relationships in old age

    Michael Wagner;Yvonne Schütze;Frieder R. Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz J. Neyer
Franz J. Neyer Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Gert G. Wagner
Gert G. Wagner German Institute for Economic Research
Helene H. Fung
Helene H. Fung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Laura L. Carstensen
Laura L. Carstensen Stanford University
Margret M. Baltes
Margret M. Baltes Freie Universität Berlin
Cornelia Wrzus
Cornelia Wrzus Heidelberg University
Oliver Lüdtke
Oliver Lüdtke Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jürgen Schupp
Jürgen Schupp German Institute for Economic Research
Raymond P. Perry
Raymond P. Perry University of Manitoba

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in Psychology, exploring related online degrees and career pathways is essential. Completing a psychology program can open doors to several rewarding professions, such as counseling, therapy, or substance abuse counseling. However, each career path comes with its own education, licensure, and state-specific requirements.

For those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Washington DC, you’ll need to complete a graduate degree and required supervised clinical hours. Similarly, understanding licensed therapist requirements in Wichita is vital, as state licensing boards may have unique prerequisites.

Cities like Winston Salem have their own expectations—see Winston Salem licensed therapist education requirements for precise details. Those aspiring to make a difference by supporting individuals with substance use disorders can explore substance abuse counselor requirements in Albuquerque.

As demand for licensed professionals increases, earning your degree online offers flexibility while meeting state and certification standards. Research your state’s regulations early to chart a successful pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Frieder R. Lang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles