World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 95 764 669 24 22 308 38191

Oliver Lüdtke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Lüdtke between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Lüdtke published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 17.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2025. 52 of the 440 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2025. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 31 publications
2001 2025

440 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Lüdtke: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 12
2005 9
2006 21
2007 24
2008 23
2009 27
2010 20
2011 12
2012 12
2013 17
2014 21
2015 14
2016 20
2017 26
2018 14
2019 17
2020 20
2021 24
2022 23
2023 21
2024 21
2025 31
Total 440
Download as CSV

Oliver Lüdtke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Lüdtke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 308
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Lüdtke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Lüdtke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78 95
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Oliver Lüdtke is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with significant contributions across related subfields including statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, education, management science and operations research, and applied psychology.

Their work engages with several main research topics, notably psychometric methodologies and testing, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, behavioral health and interventions, school choice and performance, education, achievement and giftedness, mental health research topics, and advanced causal inference techniques.

Oliver Lüdtke has published extensively in a number of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Psychological Methods

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Oliver Lüdtke include:

  • "A Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimating Cross-Lagged Effects from a Causal Inference Perspective," 2022, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • "A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions," 2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Why Full, Partial, or Approximate Measurement Invariance Are Not a Prerequisite for Meaningful and Valid Group Comparisons," 2023, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • "Does instructional quality mediate the link between teachers' emotional exhaustion and student outcomes? A large-scale study using teacher and student reports," 2021, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Is emotional exhaustion only the result of work experiences? A diary study on daily hassles and uplifts in different life domains," 2020, Anxiety Stress & Coping

Oliver Lüdtke has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Alexander Robitzsch
  • Esther Ulitzsch
  • Simon Grund
  • Reinhard Pekrun
  • Herbert W. Marsh

Best Publications

  • Academic Self‐Concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering

    Herbert W. Marsh;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Olaf Köller

  • Classical Latent Profile Analysis of Academic Self-Concept Dimensions: Synergy of Person- and Variable-Centered Approaches to Theoretical Models of Self-Concept

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Oliver Ludtke;Ulrich Trautwein;Alexandre Morin

  • Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students' Evaluations of University Teaching

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Bengt Muthen;Tihomir Asparouhov;Oliver Ludtke

  • Emotional transmission in the classroom : exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment

    Anne C. Frenzel;Thomas Goetz;Oliver Lüdtke;Reinhard Pekrun

  • A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Oliver Lüdtke;Bengt Muthén;Tihomir Asparouhov

  • The Multilevel Latent Covariate Model: A New, More Reliable Approach to Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.

    Oliver Ludtke;Herbert Warren Marsh;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Professional Development Across the Teaching Career: Teachers’ Uptake of Formal and Informal Learning Opportunities

    Dirk Richter;Mareike Kunter;Uta Klusmann;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Teachers' occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns

    Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Classroom climate and contextual effects : conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects

    Herbert W. Marsh;Oliver Lüdtke;Benjamin Nagengast;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Predicting Homework Effort: Support for a Domain-Specific, Multilevel Homework Model.

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Inge Schnyder;Alois Niggli

  • The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Marjorie Seaton;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Ludtke

  • A Random Walk Down University Avenue: Life Paths, Life Events, and Personality Trait Change at the Transition to University Life

    Oliver Lüdtke;Brent W. Roberts;Ulrich Trautwein;Gabriel Nagy

  • Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: a latent interaction modeling study

    Ulrich Trautwein;Herbert W Marsh;Benjamin Nagengast;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling

    Oliver Lüdtke;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein;Mareike Kunter

  • What makes lessons interesting?: The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects

    Yi-Miau Tsai;Mareike Kunter;Oliver Ludtke;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept.

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Olaf Köller;Jürgen Baumert

  • Tracking, grading, and student motivation : Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Herbert W. Marsh;Olaf Köller

  • Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing

    Frieder R. Lang;Dennis John;Oliver Lüdtke;Jürgen Schupp

  • Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Oliver Ludtke;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Between- and within-domain relations of students' academic emotions.

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Reinhard Pekrun;Nathan C. Hall

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Trautwein
Ulrich Trautwein University of Tübingen
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Mareike Kunter
Mareike Kunter Goethe University Frankfurt
Benjamin Nagengast
Benjamin Nagengast University of Tübingen
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dirk Richter
Dirk Richter University of Potsdam
Thomas Goetz
Thomas Goetz University of Vienna
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Anne C. Frenzel
Anne C. Frenzel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens many rewarding career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health services. One notable and growing field is substance abuse counseling. With the rising need for addiction support services across the U.S., professionals in this area are in high demand. Requirements and pathways can differ based on location and employer, but foundational steps usually include earning a relevant psychology degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and obtaining state-specific licensure.

For example, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh entails specific training and education, while Plano substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on Texas licensing and certifications. You can also look into how to become a substance abuse counselor in Port St. Lucie for insight into Florida's process, or learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Portland for the perspective from Oregon.

Whether you aim to support individuals through counseling, research, or social work, an online psychology degree provides flexibility and a solid foundation for these meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Lüdtke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles