World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nathan C. Hall

Nathan C. Hall

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4563 4223 304 283 156 12157

Nathan C. Hall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathan C. Hall between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathan C. Hall published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 4 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathan C. Hall: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 5
2005 4
2006 14
2007 7
2008 5
2009 3
2010 9
2011 2
2012 7
2013 9
2014 7
2015 10
2016 7
2017 12
2018 10
2019 16
2020 6
2021 12
2022 9
2023 6
2024 3
2025 1
Total 165
Download as CSV

Nathan C. Hall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan C. Hall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nathan C. Hall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan C. Hall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nathan C. Hall is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research spans several interconnected disciplines, including clinical psychology, social psychology, general health professions, education, and sociology and political science.

The primary topics of Nathan C. Hall's work include:

  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Among recent papers contributed by or related to the academic circles of Nathan C. Hall are:

  • Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results from the CALGB 50303 Clinical Trial, 2020, Blood
  • PhD Imposter Syndrome: Exploring Antecedents, Consequences, and Implications for Doctoral Well-Being, 2020, International journal of doctoral studies
  • Exploring relations between teacher emotions, coping strategies, and intentions to quit: A longitudinal analysis, 2021, Journal of School Psychology
  • Coping profiles among teachers: Implications for emotions, job satisfaction, burnout, and quitting intentions, 2021, Contemporary Educational Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Nathan C. Hall include:

  • Hui Wang
  • Michael V. Knopp
  • Chiung-Fang Chang
  • Lawrence H. Schwartz
  • Anna Sverdlik

Their work is often published in journals and venues such as:

  • Social Sciences
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Innovative Higher Education
  • Motivation and Emotion

Best Publications

  • Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions

    Hui Wang;Nathan C. Hall;Sonia Rahimi

  • Academic emotions from a social‐cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction

    Thomas Goetz;Reinhard Pekrun;Nathan Hall;Ludwig Haag

  • The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being

    Anna Sverdlik;Nathan C. Hall;Lynn McAlpine;Kyle Hubbard

  • Between- and within-domain relations of students' academic emotions.

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Reinhard Pekrun;Nathan C. Hall

  • Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation

    Reinhard Pekrun;Nathan C. Hall;Thomas Goetz;Raymond P. Perry

  • Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Nathan C. Hall;Reinhard Pekrun

  • Do Girls Really Experience More Anxiety in Mathematics

    Thomas Goetz;Madeleine Bieg;Oliver Lüdtke;Reinhard Pekrun

  • Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Nathan C. Hall;Ulrike E. Nett

  • Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective

    Ulrike E. Nett;Thomas Goetz;Nathan C. Hall

  • Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects

    Thomas Goetz;Hanna Cronjaeger;Anne C. Frenzel;Oliver Lüdtke

  • The Domain Specificity of Academic Emotional Experiences

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Reinhard Pekrun;Nathan C. Hall

  • Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis

    Thomas Goetz;Anne C. Frenzel;Heidrun Stoeger;Nathan C. Hall

  • Optimism and Attributional Retraining: Longitudinal Effects on Academic Achievement, Test Anxiety, and Voluntary Course Withdrawal in College Students1

    Joelle C. Ruthig;Raymond P. Perry;Nathan C. Hall;Steven Hladkyj

  • Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout

    Zaynab Sabagh;Nathan C. Hall;Alenoush Saroyan

  • Students' emotions during homework: Structures, self-concept antecedents, and achievement outcomes

    Thomas Goetz;Ulrike E. Nett;Sarah E. Martiny;Nathan C. Hall

  • Antecedents and Consequences of Teachers’ Emotional Labor: a Systematic Review and Meta-analytic Investigation

    Hui Wang;Nathan C. Hall;Jamie L. Taxer

  • Primary and secondary control in academic development : Gender-specific implications for stress and health in college students

    Nathan C. Hall;Judith G. Chipperfield;Raymond P. Perry;Joelle C. Ruthig

  • Perceived control and emotions: interactive effects on performance in achievement settings

    Joelle C. Ruthig;Raymond P. Perry;Steven Hladkyj;Nathan C. Hall

  • Exploring Student Persistence in STEM Programs: A Motivational Model

    Rebecca A. Simon;Mark W. Aulls;Helena Dedic;Kyle Hubbard

  • A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students

    Thomas Goetz;Nathan C. Hall;Anne C. Frenzel;Reinhard Pekrun

  • The role of attributional retraining and elaborative learning in college students' academic development.

    Nathan C Hall;Steven Hladkyj;Raymond P Perry;Joelle C Ruthig

  • Perceived (Academic) Control and Scholastic Attainment in Higher Education

    Raymond P. Perry;Nathan C. Hall;Joelle C. Ruthig

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Goetz
Thomas Goetz University of Vienna
Reinhard Pekrun
Reinhard Pekrun Australian Catholic University
Anne C. Frenzel
Anne C. Frenzel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Raymond P. Perry
Raymond P. Perry University of Manitoba
Robert H. Stupnisky
Robert H. Stupnisky University of North Dakota
Judith G. Chipperfield
Judith G. Chipperfield University of Manitoba
Oliver Lüdtke
Oliver Lüdtke Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Susanne P. Lajoie
Susanne P. Lajoie McGill University
Franzis Preckel
Franzis Preckel University of Trier
Ralf Schwarzer
Ralf Schwarzer Freie Universität Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of professional paths, including counseling, social work, and mental health services. Online Psychology programs in the USA offer both flexibility and accessibility, making them an excellent choice for busy adults or those seeking to jumpstart their careers.

Many students are now looking for the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Washington due to the state's focused pathways and accelerated study options. Similarly, those interested in providing mental health support in other regions may consider West Virginia accelerated counseling programs, which are designed for faster completion while meeting state requirements.

For prospective counselors in the Midwest, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Wisconsin features streamlined courses and internship opportunities tailored to state licensure standards. Wyoming accelerated counseling programs are also gaining popularity, offering targeted coursework that prepares graduates for certification and employment in a variety of clinical settings.

Taking advantage of these accelerated education options can significantly reduce the time required to start a counseling career. With a range of online programs and clear state-by-state pathways, students can achieve their goals efficiently and enter the workforce ready to make a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan C. Hall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles