World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Philip E. Pfeffer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip E. Pfeffer between 1970 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip E. Pfeffer published across 53 years, from 1970 to 2022, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1984. 1 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1984. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 5 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 8 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1970 2022

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip E. Pfeffer: publications per year, 1970 to 2022
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 1
1972 5
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 4
1978 3
1979 6
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 5
1984 8
1985 1
1986 8
1987 5
1988 4
1989 4
1990 1
1991 2
1992 5
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 7
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 3
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 110
Download as CSV

Philip E. Pfeffer publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Pfeffer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip E. Pfeffer D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Pfeffer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip E. Pfeffer is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, particularly within the subfield of plant science. The main topics explored in their work include mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, plant parasitism and resistance, and legume nitrogen-fixing symbiosis.

Their recent publication record includes a study titled "Physiological and transcriptomic response of Medicago truncatula to colonization by high- or low-benefit arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi", published in 2022 in the journal Mycorrhiza.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Philip E. Pfeffer encompass:

  • Kevin R. Cope
  • Arjun Kafle
  • Jaya K Yakha
  • Gary D. Strahan
  • Kevin Garcia

The publication venues in which they have frequently contributed include:

  • Mycorrhiza

Philip E. Pfeffer's research interests span diverse aspects of plant biology. The examination of the physiological and transcriptomic responses of leguminous plants when colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi demonstrates a focus on understanding the symbiotic relationships that promote plant growth and health. Their study explores variations in plant responses based on the benefit level of fungal colonizers, addressing important themes within plant-microbe interactions.

Topics of established focus in their publications include:

  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

This combination of subjects aligns with their broader area of expertise in agricultural and biological sciences, emphasizing plant science and symbiotic relationships that have potential applications in sustainable agriculture and plant health management.

Best Publications

  • Carbon Metabolism and Transport in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas

    Berta Bago;Philip E. Pfeffer;Yair Shachar-Hill

  • Carbon uptake and the metabolism and transport of lipids in an arbuscular mycorrhiza

    Philip E. Pfeffer;David D. Douds;Guillaume Bécard;Yair Shachar-Hill

  • Carbon availability triggers fungal nitrogen uptake and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    Carl R. Fellbaum;Emma W. Gachomo;Yugandhar Beesetty;Sulbha Choudhari

  • DEUTERIUM-INDUCED DIFFERENTIAL ISOTOPE SHIFT CARBON-13 NMR. 1. RESONANCE REASSIGNMENTS OF MONO- AND DISACCHARIDES

    Philip E. Pfeffer;Kathleen M. Valentine;Frederick W. Parrish

  • The uptake, metabolism, transport and transfer of nitrogen in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    H. Jin;H. Jin;P. E. Pfeffer;D. D. Douds;E. Piotrowski

  • Partitioning of intermediary carbon metabolism in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal leek

    Yair Shachar-Hill;P. E. Pfeffer;D. Douds;S. F. Osman

  • Carbon Export from Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Roots Involves the Translocation of Carbohydrate as well as Lipid

    Berta Bago;Philip E. Pfeffer;Jehad Abubaker;Jeongwon Jun

  • Fungal nutrient allocation in common mycorrhizal networks is regulated by the carbon source strength of individual host plants.

    Carl R. Fellbaum;Jerry A. Mensah;Adam J. Cloos;Gary E. Strahan

  • Translocation and Utilization of Fungal Storage Lipid in the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

    Berta Bago;Warren Zipfel;Rebecca M. Williams;Jeongwon Jun

  • Carbon metabolism in spores of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices as revealed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    Berta Bago;Philip E. Pfeffer;David D. Douds;Janine Brouillette

  • .alpha. Anions of carboxylic acids. II. Formation and alkylation of .alpha.-metalated aliphatic acids

    Philip E. Pfeffer;Leonard S. Silbert;John M. Chirinko

  • Carbon Partitioning, Cost, and Metabolism of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas

    David D. DoudsJr.;Philip E. Pfeffer;Yair Shachar-Hill

  • In Vivo31P NMR Studies of Corn Root Tissue and Its Uptake of Toxic Metals

    Philip E. Pfeffer;Shu-I Tu;Walter V. Gerasimowicz;James R. Cavanaugh

  • Studies of pectin solution properties by high-performance size exclusion chromatography

    Marshall L. Fishman;Philip E. Pfeffer;Robert A. Barford;Landis W. Doner

  • A phosphorus-31 solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance study of phosphate adsorption at the boehmite/aqueous solution interface

    William F. Bleam;Philip E. Pfeffer;Sabine Goldberg;Robert W. Taylor

  • Could the urea cycle be translocating nitrogen in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    Berta Bago;Philip Pfeffer;Yair Shachar‐Hill

  • The Glyoxylate Cycle in an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus. Carbon Flux and Gene Expression

    Peter J. Lammers;Jeongwon Jun;Jehad Abubaker;Raul Arreola

  • The fungus does not transfer carbon to or between roots in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

    Philip E. Pfeffer;David D. Douds;Heike Bücking;Daniel P. Schwartz

  • On-farm production of AM fungus inoculum in mixtures of compost and vermiculite.

    D.D. Douds;G. Nagahashi;P.E. Pfeffer;C. Reider

  • Structural studies of a phosphocholine substituted β-(1,3);(1,6) macrocyclic glucan from Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110

    Dominique B. Rolin;Philip E. Pfeffer;Stanley F. Osman;Benjamin S. Szwergold

Frequent Co-Authors

Yair Shachar-Hill
Yair Shachar-Hill Michigan State University
David D. Douds
David D. Douds Agricultural Research Service
Kevin B. Hicks
Kevin B. Hicks United States Department of Agriculture
Thomas A. Foglia
Thomas A. Foglia United States Department of Agriculture
Guillaume Bécard
Guillaume Bécard Paul Sabatier University
Stanley J. Opella
Stanley J. Opella University of California, San Diego
Harold M. Farrell
Harold M. Farrell United States Department of Agriculture
Stephen S. Hecht
Stephen S. Hecht University of Minnesota
R. G. Ratcliffe
R. G. Ratcliffe University of Oxford
Jürgen Ebel
Jürgen Ebel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to forensic science or criminal justice can open diverse career opportunities in the USA. For those interested in forensic applications of chemistry, exploring the best online colleges for forensic science provides an affordable path to gain specialized knowledge and skills. These programs often blend scientific principles with practical investigations essential for criminal justice careers.

Advancing education with an online forensic psychology masters is another option for those focusing on the psychological aspects of crime. This degree equips students with insights into criminal behavior, complementing the scientific analysis performed by forensic chemists.

Understanding salary expectations and job roles is crucial before committing to a career. The article on forensic career paths and salary offers valuable information about employment options and earnings, helping students make informed decisions about their future.

Cost is often a major factor when selecting a program. For students weighing financial considerations, reviewing data on criminal justice degree online cost helps assess tuition and fees, ensuring their investment aligns with career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip E. Pfeffer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles